Evaluating the validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Music therapy Sensory Instrument for Cognition, Consciousness and Awareness (MuSICCA): protocol of a validation study

Jonathan Wain Pool, Richard John Siegert, Steven Taylor, Carolyn Dunford, Wendy Magee, Jonathan Wain Pool, Richard John Siegert, Steven Taylor, Carolyn Dunford, Wendy Magee

Abstract

Introduction: A growing number of children and young people are surviving severe acquired brain injuries due to advances in healthcare. However, many fail to emerge from coma and continue to live with disorders of consciousness (DOC). Diagnostic, clinical and ethical challenges are prominent in this group. Misdiagnosis can have severe consequences for children and their families, including inadequate care, insufficient access to rehabilitation and stimulation, reduced accessibility to services and inappropriately limited opportunities for participation. The proposed project will develop and validate a diagnostic measure that supports detailed goal-planning-the Music therapy Sensory Instrument for Cognition, Consciousness and Awareness (MuSICCA).

Methods and analysis: Face validity will be assessed using a short questionnaire and the MuSICCA will be amended if face validity is insufficient. Once face validity is sufficient, 80 participants with suspected DOC will be recruited from multiple sites around the UK, USA and Ireland.Validity will be assessed using external reference standards (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, Coma Near-Coma Scale and Nociception Coma Scale). Intra-rater reliability will be established using repeated ratings of video recordings from the assessment sessions. Inter-rater reliability will be assessed through video ratings by a second blinded assessor. In addition to these analyses, the clinical utility of the MuSICCA will be evaluated using a questionnaire to be completed by clinicians and relatives of the participants following the completion of the MuSICCA assessment.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained for this study from the Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority of the National Health Service of the UK (ID: 167534). Results will be presented at national and international conferences, published in scientific journals and disseminated to participant representatives, clinicians, educators and care providers.

Trial registration details: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System on 7th August 2019 (ID: NCT04050995); Pre-results.

Keywords: developmental neurology & neurodisability; neurological injury; paediatric neurology; paediatric palliative care; rehabilitation medicine.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study design. A1L1 represents data from assessor A1 conducting the first live assessment; A1L2 represents data from assessor A1 conducting a further live assessment (randomly selected from sessions 2, 3 or 4); A1V represents assessor A1 conducting video analysis of his/her own session after 4 to 6 weeks; A2V represents assessor A2 conducting video analysis of a MuSICCA session that was conducted by assessor A1. CRS-R, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised; DOC, disorders of consciousness;MuSICCA, Music therapy Sensory Instrument for Cognition, Consciousnessand Awareness; NCS-R, Nociception Coma Scale-Revised.

References

    1. Royal College of Physicians Prolonged disorders of consciousness following sudden onset brain injury: national clinical guidelines. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2020.
    1. Seel RT, Sherer M, Whyte J, et al. . Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1795–813. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.218
    1. Hoyt CS. Visual function in the brain-damaged child. Eye 2003;17:369–84. 10.1038/sj.eye.6700364
    1. Huo R, Burden SK, Hoyt CS, et al. . Chronic cortical visual impairment in children: aetiology, prognosis, and associated neurological deficits. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:670–5. 10.1136/bjo.83.6.670
    1. Ashwal S. Disorders of consciousness. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013;55:5–6. 10.1111/dmcn.12031
    1. Magee WL, Ghetti CM, Moyer A. Feasibility of the music therapy assessment tool for awareness in disorders of consciousness (MATADOC) for use with pediatric populations. Front Psychol 2015;6:698. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00698
    1. Laureys S, Schiff ND. Coma and consciousness: paradigms (re)framed by neuroimaging. Neuroimage 2012;61:478–91. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.041
    1. Pool J, Magee WL. Music in the treatment of children and youth with disorders of consciousness: a review of the literature. Front Psychol 2016;7:202.
    1. O'Kelly J, James L, Palaniappan R, et al. . Neurophysiological and behavioral responses to music therapy in vegetative and minimally conscious states. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:884. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00884
    1. Castro M, Tillmann B, Luauté J, et al. . Boosting cognition with music in patients with disorders of consciousness. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015;29:734–42. 10.1177/1545968314565464
    1. Grimm T, Kreutz G. Music interventions in disorders of consciousness (DOC) - a systematic review. Brain Inj 2018;32:704–14. 10.1080/02699052.2018.1451657
    1. Magee WL, Siegert RJ, Daveson BA, et al. . Music therapy assessment tool for awareness in disorders of consciousness (MATADOC): standardisation of the principal subscale to assess awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2014;24:101–24. 10.1080/09602011.2013.844174
    1. Magee WL, Lenton-Smith G, Daveson B. Music therapy assessment for awareness in disorders of consciousness (MATADOC): assessment manual and Instructions for use. London: Royal Hospital For Neuro-Disability, 2012.
    1. Ashwal S, Cranford R. The minimally conscious state in children. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2002;9:19–34. 10.1053/spen.2002.30334
    1. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK coma recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:2020–9. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033
    1. Rappaport M, Dougherty AM, Kelting DL. Evaluation of coma and vegetative states. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:628–34.
    1. Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. . The nociception coma scale: a new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain 2010;148:215–9. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.09.028
    1. Brennan RL. Elements of generalizability theory. 2nd ed Iowa City: American College Testing, 1992.
    1. Burns KJ. Beyond classical reliability: using generalizability theory to assess dependability. Res Nurs Health 1998;21:83–90. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199802)21:1<83::AID-NUR9>;2-P
    1. Cronbach LJ, Rajaratnam N, Gleser GC. Theory of generalizability: a liberalization of reliability theory. Br J Stat Psychol 1963;16:137–63. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1963.tb00206.x
    1. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. . STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem 2015;61:1446–52. 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280

Source: PubMed

3
購読する