Non-isotope Based Imaging Modalities vs Technetium-99m Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography(99mTcSPECT) (MITNECB5)
2020년 2월 20일 업데이트: Montreal Heart Institute
Non-isotope Based Imaging Modalities vs 99mTcSPECT to Detect Myocardial Ischemia in Patients at High Risk for Ischemic Cardiovascular Events
SPECT is currently the dominant clinical test for diagnostic and prognostic purposes as well as therapeutic decision-making.
Given the shortage of nuclear reactor-produced Tc, advancing the use of non-isotope based imaging modalities has the potential to change the standard of care for patients with CAD as each one of these technics (CMR, CT, Stress echocardiography) has its own distinct potential advantages over SPECT.
연구 개요
상태
완전한
정황
상세 설명
Obtain a better understanding of the clinical utility of advanced non-isotope-based imaging modalities to detect relevant CAD as potential alternatives to SPECT.
Approximately 450 subjects will be enrolled in total.
Three groups of about 150 patients per group.
Each group will undergo imaging with 2 modalities; Group 1: 99mTcSPECT plus CMR, Group 2: 99mTcSPECT plus CT, Group 3:99mTcSPECT plus stress echocardiography.
All 450 patients will undergo standard invasive coronary angiography following completion of non-invasive imaging, except for patients in whom both nuclear and non-nuclear imaging modalities reveal a normal result confirming the absence of significant coronary artery disease (i.e invasive angiography would not be clinically indicated and FFR would be considered to be above 0.8).
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infraction (TIMI) flow will be measured in all patients undergoing angiography, and fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be measured in all patients except those with TIMI flow =0, 1 and 2. All imaging procedures must be completed within 6 weeks.
All patients will have a follow-up visit at 6 months after enrollment.
During the 6 month follow-up visit major adverse cardiovascular events will be collected and adjudicated by a clinical endpoint committee (CEC).
연구 유형
관찰
등록 (실제)
467
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, 캐나다
- Montreal Heart Institute
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
18년 (성인, 고령자)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
연구 대상 성별
모두
샘플링 방법
비확률 샘플
연구 인구
Approximately 450 patients across Canada.
Patients will be identified after a clinically indicated SPECT for evaluation of myocardial ischemia.The investigator will assign the patient in one of the three groups based on his medical assessment and availability of equipment at the centre.
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- clinically indicated request for SPECT
- ability to undergo at least one of three non-nuclear imaging tests; CMR, CT or Stress Echocardiography
- History of recent symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia
- High risk for ischemic cardiovascular events
Exclusion Criteria:
- severely reduced systolic function (LV ejection fraction less than 35%)
- Recent (less than 3 days) acute coronary syndrome including acute myocardial infarction
- contraindications to dipyridamole SPECT including : i)severe reactive airway disease; ii) less than 3 days post Myocardial Infarction - Acute Coronary Syndrome (MI-ACS); iii) high-grade Atrioventricular block (AV block); iv)allergy to dipyridamole or theophylline; v) caffeine within 12 hours; vi) theophylline use within 48 hours; vii) severe claustrophobia; or viii) women who may be pregnant
- kidney dysfunction (i.e estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 45)
- use of investigational drug or device within 30 days of screening visit
- Coronary Artery Bypass Graft(s) surgery (CABG)
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
코호트 및 개입
그룹/코호트 |
|---|
|
Diagnosis
Group 3: 99mTCSPECT plus stress echocardiography
|
|
group 1 : diagnosis
Group 1: 99mTcSPECT plus CMR
|
|
Group 2: diagnosis
Group 2: 99mTcSPECT plus CT
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall accuracy of "significant coronary artery disease (CAD)" according to non-invasive imaging modality
기간: baseline
|
The overall accuracy is calculated as the probability that a subject is correctly classified (presence of significant CAD or not) by non-invasive imaging modality.
The standard of truth is presence of significant CAD or not according to the invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR)
|
baseline
|
|
Sensitivity of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
기간: baseline
|
The sensitivity is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality
|
baseline
|
|
Specificity of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
기간: baseline
|
The specificity is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality
|
baseline
|
|
Positive predictive value of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
기간: baseline
|
The positive predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly have significant CAD according to FFR
|
baseline
|
|
Negative predictive value of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
기간: Baseline
|
The negative predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly does not have significant CAD according to FFR
|
Baseline
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
기간 |
|---|---|
|
Overall accuracy of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
기간: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
Sensitivity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
기간: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
기간 |
|---|---|
|
Specificity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
기간: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
Positive predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
기간: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
Negative predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
기간: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
Overall accuracy of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
기간: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
Sensitivity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
기간: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
Specificity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
기간: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
Positive predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
기간: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
Negative predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
기간: baseline
|
baseline
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Jean-Claude Tardif, M.D, Montreal Heart Institute
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
2012년 10월 1일
기본 완료 (실제)
2018년 5월 1일
연구 완료 (실제)
2019년 4월 18일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2013년 7월 18일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2013년 10월 24일
처음 게시됨 (추정)
2013년 10월 30일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2020년 2월 21일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2020년 2월 20일
마지막으로 확인됨
2020년 2월 1일
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .