Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Non-isotope Based Imaging Modalities vs Technetium-99m Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography(99mTcSPECT) (MITNECB5)

20. februar 2020 opdateret af: Montreal Heart Institute

Non-isotope Based Imaging Modalities vs 99mTcSPECT to Detect Myocardial Ischemia in Patients at High Risk for Ischemic Cardiovascular Events

SPECT is currently the dominant clinical test for diagnostic and prognostic purposes as well as therapeutic decision-making. Given the shortage of nuclear reactor-produced Tc, advancing the use of non-isotope based imaging modalities has the potential to change the standard of care for patients with CAD as each one of these technics (CMR, CT, Stress echocardiography) has its own distinct potential advantages over SPECT.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Obtain a better understanding of the clinical utility of advanced non-isotope-based imaging modalities to detect relevant CAD as potential alternatives to SPECT. Approximately 450 subjects will be enrolled in total. Three groups of about 150 patients per group. Each group will undergo imaging with 2 modalities; Group 1: 99mTcSPECT plus CMR, Group 2: 99mTcSPECT plus CT, Group 3:99mTcSPECT plus stress echocardiography. All 450 patients will undergo standard invasive coronary angiography following completion of non-invasive imaging, except for patients in whom both nuclear and non-nuclear imaging modalities reveal a normal result confirming the absence of significant coronary artery disease (i.e invasive angiography would not be clinically indicated and FFR would be considered to be above 0.8). Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infraction (TIMI) flow will be measured in all patients undergoing angiography, and fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be measured in all patients except those with TIMI flow =0, 1 and 2. All imaging procedures must be completed within 6 weeks. All patients will have a follow-up visit at 6 months after enrollment. During the 6 month follow-up visit major adverse cardiovascular events will be collected and adjudicated by a clinical endpoint committee (CEC).

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

467

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Montreal Heart Institute

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 87 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Approximately 450 patients across Canada. Patients will be identified after a clinically indicated SPECT for evaluation of myocardial ischemia.The investigator will assign the patient in one of the three groups based on his medical assessment and availability of equipment at the centre.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinically indicated request for SPECT
  • ability to undergo at least one of three non-nuclear imaging tests; CMR, CT or Stress Echocardiography
  • History of recent symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia
  • High risk for ischemic cardiovascular events

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severely reduced systolic function (LV ejection fraction less than 35%)
  • Recent (less than 3 days) acute coronary syndrome including acute myocardial infarction
  • contraindications to dipyridamole SPECT including : i)severe reactive airway disease; ii) less than 3 days post Myocardial Infarction - Acute Coronary Syndrome (MI-ACS); iii) high-grade Atrioventricular block (AV block); iv)allergy to dipyridamole or theophylline; v) caffeine within 12 hours; vi) theophylline use within 48 hours; vii) severe claustrophobia; or viii) women who may be pregnant
  • kidney dysfunction (i.e estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 45)
  • use of investigational drug or device within 30 days of screening visit
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Graft(s) surgery (CABG)

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Diagnosis
Group 3: 99mTCSPECT plus stress echocardiography
group 1 : diagnosis
Group 1: 99mTcSPECT plus CMR
Group 2: diagnosis
Group 2: 99mTcSPECT plus CT

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Overall accuracy of "significant coronary artery disease (CAD)" according to non-invasive imaging modality
Tidsramme: baseline
The overall accuracy is calculated as the probability that a subject is correctly classified (presence of significant CAD or not) by non-invasive imaging modality. The standard of truth is presence of significant CAD or not according to the invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR)
baseline
Sensitivity of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
Tidsramme: baseline
The sensitivity is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality
baseline
Specificity of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
Tidsramme: baseline
The specificity is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to FFR is correctly identified as such by non-invasive imaging modality
baseline
Positive predictive value of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
Tidsramme: baseline
The positive predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with presence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly have significant CAD according to FFR
baseline
Negative predictive value of "significant CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality
Tidsramme: Baseline
The negative predictive value is calculated as the probability that a subject with absence of significant CAD according to non-invasive imaging modality truly does not have significant CAD according to FFR
Baseline

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Overall accuracy of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
Tidsramme: baseline
baseline
Sensitivity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
Tidsramme: Baseline
Baseline

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Specificity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
Tidsramme: baseline
baseline
Positive predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
Tidsramme: baseline
baseline
Negative predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality flow and FFR
Tidsramme: baseline
baseline
Overall accuracy of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Tidsramme: baseline
baseline
Sensitivity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Tidsramme: baseline
baseline
Specificity of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Tidsramme: baseline
baseline
Positive predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Tidsramme: baseline
baseline
Negative predictive value of "high-risk CAD" according to non-invasive imaging modality to predict occurrence of the composite clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Tidsramme: baseline
baseline

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Jean-Claude Tardif, M.D, Montreal Heart Institute

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. oktober 2012

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. maj 2018

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

18. april 2019

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

18. juli 2013

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

24. oktober 2013

Først opslået (Skøn)

30. oktober 2013

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

21. februar 2020

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

20. februar 2020

Sidst verificeret

1. februar 2020

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

UBESLUTET

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Myokardieiskæmi

Abonner