이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Coping With Adolescent Peer Victimization and Reducing Anxious/Depressed Symptoms

2015년 12월 16일 업데이트: Annette La Greca, PhD, University of Miami

Among adolescents, SAD and depression are prevalent, highly comorbid, and can be chronic and impairing. Interpersonal peer victimization (IPV) is a key stressor that contributes to both social anxiety and depression in adolescents; it includes relational (e.g., social exclusion) and reputational (e.g., spreading rumors) forms of peer victimization. Currently, there are no preventive interventions for adolescent SAD. Also, effective preventive interventions for adolescents have not yet integrated a focus on both social anxiety and depression or targeted specific peer risk factors. Interventions for depression and for bullying have not addressed IPV, which is less observable than overt victimization (e.g., threats, physical acts).

Thus, the Peers Emotions and Relationships (PEERS/UTalk) intervention, will take an integrated approach to reducing risk for SAD and depression by modifying and adapting an evidence-based intervention for depression, Interpersonal Psychotherapy- Adolescents Skills Training (IPT-AST), that focuses on improving interpersonal skills and managing conflict. We will add a) elements of anxiety-based treatments (e.g., exposures) and b) strategies for handling challenging peer experiences. PEERS/UTalk will have a positive focus and will target adolescents who report elevated symptoms of social anxiety and/or depression and high levels of IPV.

Following are the aims and hypotheses of the Pilot-Randomized Controlled Trial:

Aim: Evaluate PEERS/UTalk. We will screen adolescents and conduct a pilot randomized trial of PEERS (U Talk) versus an Education/Support (ES) condition with up to 60 "high-risk" adolescents.

Hypothesis 1: Both PEERS/UTalk and ES conditions will demonstrate: (a) feasibility via rates of participation and study completion, (b) intervention credibility via adolescents' ratings of acceptability and satisfaction, and (c) high rates of clinician fidelity to the respective manuals.

Hypothesis 2: Adolescents randomized to PEERS/UTalk will show improvements in primary outcomes (less IPV, fewer symptoms of social anxiety and depression, improved clinician ratings) relative to those in the ES condition.

Hypothesis 3: The benefits of PEERS/UTalk over ES will be apparent on the secondary outcomes of increased quality of close friendships, increased peer support.

Exploratory Aims: We will examine: (1) the durability and persistence of PEERS/UTalk intervention effects versus ES on primary outcomes at 6-month follow-up and (2) potential moderators of response to the PEERS/UTalk intervention, recognizing that there are power limitations in doing so.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

Participants in the Pilot-Randomized Controlled Trial (P-RCT) will be provided with PEERS/UTalk or an Education/Support (ES) control condition, and will receive up to 3 individual and up to 10 group sessions of either. Clinicians will be clinical postdoctoral trainee or doctoral students in clinical psychology with specialized training in evidence-based treatments for youth and experience working with child populations; all clinicians will receive intensive training on the PEERS/UTalk intervention prior to the P-RCT. The research-specific intervention is conceptualized as a preventive intervention, with the possibility of altering the length of the program as needed. The intent is to develop PEERS/UTalk so that it fits within a 60-90 minute period that meets about once a week, during one school semester, or could potentially be conducted as an after-school "club." As is typical of adolescent school-based prevention programs, the groups will be co-ed.

The PEERS/UTalk intervention will consist of the following: The first 2 sessions will be conducted individually, during school, and be modeled on procedures used in Interpersonal Psychotherapy - Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST), which are further modified to address issues of social anxiety and of IPV. The first 2 sessions are about 45-60 minutes long; a clinician meets with each adolescent to assess PV experiences and socially anxious and depressive symptoms, provides a framework for the group, and conducts an abbreviated interpersonal inventory. The interpersonal inventory is a clinical interview in which the clinician and adolescent review significant peer and other relationships looking for strengths as well as problems and patterns of communication and problem-solving; we have adapted this interview to incorporate IPV experiences and how they influence the adolescent's feelings of social anxiety or depressive symptoms. Together the adolescent and clinician identify interpersonal goals for the group. An inventory of IPV experiences that are challenging for adolescents will also be obtained. The next sessions (up to 10) will be group-sessions (up to 8 adolescents per group) and will incorporate key elements of IPT-AST (modified to integrate strategies for social anxiety, taken from the Unified Protocol for the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Youth [UP-Y]); these treatment elements will be adapted to include examples of IPV experiences and strategies for handling them. We plan to build on the IPT-AST intervention model because of its focus on improving interpersonal relations and enhancing social skills and supportive relationships. However, we also plan to incorporate strategies from the UP-Y to help teens manage social anxiety; and for all sessions we will cover both social anxiety and depressive feelings and adjust the examples, exercises, and homework assignments so that they incorporate strategies for handling IPV experiences. We also will review the Miami-Dade County Public Schools bullying policy so adolescents know how to handle more serious events, should they arise. Specifically, the first group session will educate members about the symptoms of social anxiety and depression, outline interpersonal problem areas and IPV experiences, and discuss the relationship between feelings and interpersonal interactions. During session 2, discussion and activities help adolescents understand the impact of their words and actions on others, and the feelings that result from a given interaction, including IPV experiences. In session 3, adolescents are introduced to different communication and interpersonal strategies (using "I feel statements", finding the right time to have a conversation) and practice these skills by role-playing hypothetical situations, including ones that involve IPV (e.g., social exclusion, handling an embarrassing situation). In sessions 4-6, group members apply the interpersonal strategies to different relationships in their lives, particularly peer relationships that are linked to IPV experiences and to socially anxious and depressive symptoms. The group also discusses how these techniques can help the adolescents develop new relationships. Adolescents try these techniques outside of group and report back about how the interactions went. Session 7 is devoted to practicing exposure to social situations that are associated with uncomfortable feelings, particularly those occurring in an interpersonal context. Adolescents learn about positive friendship qualities and discuss how to identify these characteristics in others. In session 8, adolescents discuss peer and cyber victimization, as well as how to handle challenging peer situations. During group sessions 9-10, the group reviews the strategies learned and changes that have occurred in the adolescents' relationships and symptoms. Group members are encouraged to continue the interpersonal work on their own.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

49

단계

  • 2 단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Florida
      • Coral Gables, Florida, 미국, 33124
        • University of Miami

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

13년 (어린이, 성인)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female adolescents, ages 13-18 years (inclusive) and in grades 9, 10, or 11.
  • Participants must be sufficiently fluent in English (by their own self-report) to complete measures and intervention programs in this language.
  • Participants must report elevated levels of relational PV and/or reputational PV on screening measures (R-PEQ); i.e., adolescents must obtain a total score > or = to 6 on the relational and/or reputational subscales of the R-PEQ.
  • Participants must report symptoms of social anxiety and/or depression that exceed clinical cutoffs on the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (SAS-A > or = to 50) or the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D > or = to 16).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Enrollment in special education services (e.g., for learning disabilities, mental retardation, pervasive developmental disorder).
  • Adolescents must not exceed clinical cutoffs (t score > 63) on the Aggression Subscale of the Youth Self Report (YSR).
  • Adolescents must not report elevated levels (score >6) on the overt peer victimization scale of the R-PEQ.
  • Adolescents must not currently meet diagnostic criteria for a social anxiety or depressive disorder as determined by the Anxiety Disorders Schedule for Children (ADIS-IV-C).
  • Adolescents must not currently meet criteria for PTSD, bipolar disorder, psychosis, or an eating, substance use, or conduct disorder on the ADIS-IV-C.
  • Adolescents must not endorse active suicidal items on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
  • Adolescents must not be currently receiving treatment for social anxiety or depressive disorder.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 방지
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: UTalk Intervention
Active preventative intervention condition.
Prevention intervention delivered in group format adapted from IPT-AST, for adolescents who experience peer victimization and who are at risk for developing social anxiety and depression.
간섭 없음: Control
Education/Support Condition

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
기간
Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule- Children (ADIS-C)
기간: Baseline, Change from baseline in Clinician Severity Rating at 12 weeks and at 6 month follow up for Social Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder
Baseline, Change from baseline in Clinician Severity Rating at 12 weeks and at 6 month follow up for Social Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder
Clinicians Global Impression Scale (Severity and Improvement)
기간: Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Revised Peer Experiences Questionnaire (subscales for Relational and Reputational PV)
기간: Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
기간
Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents
기간: Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Centers for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale
기간: Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Perceived Support Scale- Friends and Family
기간: Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Cyber Peer Experiences Questionnaire
기간: Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Revised Peer Experiences Questionnaire
기간: Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Health Behaviors
기간: Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up
Screening, Baseline, Change from baseline at 12 weeks, and at 6 month follow up

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Annette M La Greca, PhD, University of Miami

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2012년 6월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2015년 5월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2015년 6월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2013년 6월 7일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2013년 12월 9일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2013년 12월 13일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)

2015년 12월 17일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2015년 12월 16일

마지막으로 확인됨

2015년 12월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 1R34MH095959-01A1 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

3
구독하다