이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Patient Experiences of Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice

2018년 12월 11일 업데이트: Camilla Aakjær Andersen, Aalborg University

Patient Experiences of Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Questionnaire Study

This study in part of a larger cohort study (clinical trials ID number: NCT03375333) that examine the use of ultrasound in general practice.

In the present study patient experiences, with use of ultrasound in the consultation at the general practitioners office, will be explored through a questionnaire.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

상세 설명

This study is a Cross-sectional study, which is conducted as part of a larger cohort study: How Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POC-US) Affects the Diagnostic Process in General Practice. A prospective follow-up study. (Clinical trials registration number: NCT03375333)

Study setting:

The study will take place in 20 different general practices in Denmark where the general practitioners (GPs) use POC-US.

Interventions There is no intervention in this study. The registration in this study will reflect GPs routine daily use of POC-US not adding more examinations or in other ways influence on the treatment of patients.

Sample size Twenty general practitioners (GPs) are expected to use POC-US 2-3 times a day, and assuming a participation rate of 80%, there will be between 640-960 US scan during the study period of one month.

Recruitment All patients who consult the participating GP for conditions relevant for a POC-US examination will be offered to participate in the study. Patients are excluded if they do not wish to participate or if they are not able to give an informed consent.

Patients must provide written, informed consent before any study procedures occur. Only patients assigned to the GPs practice can participate in the study.

Data collection method After the consultation in the GP's office, patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about their experience with POC-US in the consultation. The GPs will provide the patients with a unique ID-number and a link to an online questionnaire on the SurveyXact server. The patients will access the online questionnaire using this ID-number through Ipads or on a paper edition.

Baseline information regarding the participating GPs will be provided through the original study. Baseline questions about the patients will be part of the patient-questionnaire following the consultation.

The items in this questionnaire are generated from a qualitative interview study with GPs working in general practice and using POC-US. The items are the GPs expressed believes and concerns about how ultrasound was experienced by their patients.

This questionnaire is developed through the following steps:

  1. A first edition of the questionnaire is developed based on the results of a qualitative interview study with Danish GPs on their experiences on how ultrasound can be used in general practice.
  2. To test face validity, comprehension and wording of the questionnaire, pilot tests are done with laypeople and patients,using the "think-aloud" technique and cognitive interviewing. The pilot-tests are done in two geographical-separated clinics including five patients in each clinic. Adaptions and rephrasing follow after the results are compared.
  3. A validation test will include presenting the rephrased questions from the pilot-tests to 5 GPs, who use ultrasound, and asking them to compare the phrased questions to the original items from the qualitative interviews. Adaptions will follow.
  4. A final pilot-test will include interviews with patients, who have been ultrasound scanned in two other clinics using the "Think-aloud" technique. In this pilot-test the patients are presented to both a paper-version and an online-version of the questionnaire, to test functionality and feasibility. Pilot-tests and adaptions will continue until the questionnaire is completed without difficulties.

Retention Participant Retention GPs will be asked to register not-included patients, in whom POC-US was used during the study period, on a separate form and to declare the reason for the failed inclusion of the patient.

Participant Withdrawal Participating GPs and patients may withdraw from the study for any reason at any time.

Data management Data will be saved electronically in the SurveyXact server and on a server at Aalborg University and will only be accessed by the research group using passwords.

The Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg is the Data Controller. Each participating GP will be data processor and can only process data pursuant to an agreement with the data controller. A data processor agreements will be made between the Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg and each participating GP, between the Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg and Aalborg University, and between Aalborg University and SurveyXact according to the Danish Data Protection Agency recommendations.

The Key files identifying the patients will be safely stored at the GPs office and the research group will not have access to this information during the study.

Statistics The questionnaire data will be collected on an ordinal scale and reported descriptively using frequencies. The correlation between the GPs reported confidence in the tentative diagnosis on a numeric rating scale from 1-5 perceived at an ordinal scale and patients reported experience of ultrasound in the consultation will be compared using scatterplots and Goodman and Kruskal's gamma will be used to test association.

Data monitoring During the study period the research team will be able to observe if the GPs include patients in the study and make contact to the GPs who fail to include patients in order to help out with any difficulties.

Harms All adverse events occurring during the study will be registered.

Research ethics approval The studies are approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Committee of Multipractice Studies in General Practice in Denmark.

Consent or assent Prior to participation, patients will receive written and oral information and a written consent to participate will be obtained.

If a GP or a patient wished to redraw their consent to participate in the study, the GP will contact the research team and no further data will be collected.

Protocol amendments Will be declared and all editions and changes in the protocol will be saved.

Confidentiality All participating GPs have signed a confidentiality agreement.

Declaration of interest None

Access to data Only the Research team will have access to data.

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (실제)

579

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Aalborg, 덴마크, 9220
        • Research unit for general practice in Aalborg,department of clinical medicine Aalborg university

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 어린이
  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

샘플링 방법

비확률 샘플

연구 인구

The study will take place in 20 different general practices in Denmark where the GPs use POC-US. The participating GPs will try to include all patients were they use POC-US in the consultation.

Patients must provide written, informed consent before any study procedures occur (see Appendix 1 for sample Informed Consent Form). Only patients assigned to the GPs practice can participate in the study.

설명

Inclusion criteria:

- All patients, who the GP intends to examine with POC-US.

Exclusions criteria:

  • Patient not willing or able to give informed consent
  • Patients previously included in the study

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 관찰 모델: 보병대
  • 시간 관점: 단면

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Information
기간: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination

This domain will be explored through the following questions:

Were you informed about the purpose of the ultrasound examination? Were you informed about the difference between a specialist ultrasound and a GP ultrasound? Were you informed about the result of the ultrasound examination?

assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Influence on the consultation
기간: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination

This domain will be explored through the following questions:

Did you think the ultrasound examination was a natural part of the consultation? Did you think the ultrasound examination was disruptive in the consultation? Did the ultrasound examination influence the relationship between the GP and you? Do you think ultrasound made a difference in the consultation?

assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Diagnostic reassurance
기간: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination

This domain will be explored through the following questions:

Do you feel more thoroughly examined after the ultrasound examination? Do you have a better understanding of your health problem after the ultrasound examination? Do you feel more at ease after the ultrasound examination? Has your confidence in the GPs diagnosis changed after the ultrasound examination? Has the ultrasound examination changed your feeling of being taken seriously?

assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Patient satisfaction
기간: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination

This domain will be explored through the following questions:

Was your overall experience with ultrasound in the GP's office positive or negative? Would you recommend ultrasound in the GPs office to others? Do you think ultrasound is a service improvement in the GP's office? Do you think ultrasound is a quality improvement in the GP's office?

assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Associations between GP confidence in the diagnosis and patients sense of diagnostic reassurance
기간: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Association between GPs declared confidence in the tentative diagnosis after using ultrasound in the consultation (data from the original cohort expressed on a scale from increased confidence to decreased confidence) and patients' answers to the question "Has your confidence in the GPs diagnosis changed after the ultrasound examination?" expressed on a scale from decreased to increased confidence.
assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Associations between GP confidence in the diagnosis and patients experience of improved care
기간: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Association between GPs declared confidence in the tentative diagnosis after using ultrasound in the consultation (expressed in the original cohort on a scale from increased confidence to decreased confidence) and patients' answers to the question "Do you feel more at ease after the ultrasound examination?" expressed on a scale from less at ease to more at ease.
assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

수사관

  • 연구 의자: Martin Bach Jensen, Professor, GP, PhD, Aalborg University

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2018년 1월 15일

기본 완료 (실제)

2018년 9월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2018년 9월 2일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2018년 1월 10일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2018년 1월 29일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 1월 31일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 12월 12일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2018년 12월 11일

마지막으로 확인됨

2018년 12월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • GULD-patient questionnaire

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

미정

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

3
구독하다