- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT03750526
Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
2019년 12월 9일 업데이트: Lai chien hung, Taipei Medical University Hospital
Investigate the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Technology in Persons With Stroke
This study is to investigate the combined effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Augmented Reality (AR) intervention on cortical excitability, balance, gait, activity in individuals with stroke.
Forty participants will be recruited in this study.
They will be allocated to four group: rTMS and AR group (10), sham rTMS and AR group (10), AR group (10), and conventional physiotherapy group (10).
연구 개요
상태
알려지지 않은
정황
상세 설명
Participants will be randomized allocated to four groups: rTMS and AR group, sham rTMS and AR group, AR group ,and conventional physiotherapy group in current study.
All participants underwent four weeks, 3 sessions per week, and 60 minutes per session training program.
Motor evoked potential (MEP), Time up go test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT),The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS), and Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) will be assessed before and after intervention in all participants.
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (예상)
40
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
-
Taipei, 대만
- 모병
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
20년 (성인, 고령자)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
연구 대상 성별
모두
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive ability is sufficient to understand the nature of study (Mini-Mental State Examination score was above 23).
- Participants suffer from unilateral hemiplegia caused by a first-ever stroke.
- Participants are stable in medical and psychological condition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants have other neurologic problems that can affect balance and walking ability.
- Participants take of drugs or have other medical condition that can affect balance and function.
- Participants have contraindications for rTMS intervention such as pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal in the brain or skull, open wound of brain, or history of epilepsy.
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group A will undergo repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (real, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
|
rTMS performs 1Hz,15 minutes real rTMS.
AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
|
|
활성 비교기: Sham rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group B will receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (sham,1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
|
Sham rTMS applies 1Hz, 15 minutes sham rTMS.
AR intervention includes weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
|
|
활성 비교기: AR group
Ten participants in group C will undergo augmented reality exercise 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
|
AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 60 minutes.
|
|
활성 비교기: Conventional physiotherapy group
Ten participants allocated to the group D will receive conventional physiotherapy 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
|
Conventional physiotherapy includes rolling, sitting, balance exercise, standing, overground walking, facilitation of the paretic limbs, and so on for 60 minutes.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Time Up Go test (TUG)
기간: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
The TUG test will ask participants to stand up, walk for 3 m, turn, walk back and sit down as fast as they can during the test, and the time requires for each patient to complete the test is recorded.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
기간: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Participants performed a series of 14 functional balance tasks, including maintaining a quiet stance, sitting-to-standing, shifting weight and reaching, turning in place, standing on one leg, and maintaining a tandem stance.
Each task was scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (from 0 to 4).
A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 4 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion.
The highest possible score is 56.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Motor evoked potential (MEP)
기간: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Motor evoked potential (MEP) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following direct transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex.
All TMS is delivered with the participant seated upright on the chair.
Both passive and active conditions, participants are instructed to relax their right leg in the seated position.
TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom).
To locate the optimal site, stimuli are delivered over various points along the M1.
The optimal site is the location on the M1 that evoked the greatest MEP amplitude in the bilateral tibialis anterior muscles.
The onset latency and onset to peak amplitude will be assessed.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)-Lower extremity
기간: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower extremity is used to measure lower-limb recovery in stroke rehabilitation studies.The scale has 6 items ranging from reflex activity to voluntary motor control.
Each item further comprises components, with a total of 17. Scoring is done on a 3-point ordinal scale ranges from 0 (no performance) to 2 (faultless performance).
The total score range from 0 (no motor function) to 34 (good motor recovery).
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT)
기간: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Participants will be required to reach in the forward, left and right directions.
The test is performed with the participant in standing.
It is the measure of the difference, in centimeters, between arm's length with arms at 90° flexion/ abduction and maximal forward, left and right directions reaching respectively, using a fixed base of support.
The test uses a centimeters measuring device against a wall at shoulder height.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)
기간: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) is a postural assessment scale specifically designed to assess and monitor postural control after stroke.
It contains 12 four-level items of varying difficulty for assessing ability to maintain or change a given lying, sitting, or standing posture.
The PASS consists of 2 sections with a 4-point scale to describe each task.
The total score ranges from 0 - 36.
A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 3 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion.
The highest possible score is 36.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ)
기간: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) contains 18 items to screen the situation of depression within a week.
The TDQ, which is a 4-point scale with 18 items, is a culturally specific depression self-rating instrument for effective screening of depression in Taiwan and has satisfactory reliability and validity.
Subjects are guided to rate each item on a scale from 0 to 3 on the basis of "how often you felt the physical and emotional aspects during the past week".
Zero denotes never, three means always.
TDQ scores range from 0 to 54.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
2018년 7월 31일
기본 완료 (예상)
2020년 10월 30일
연구 완료 (예상)
2020년 12월 30일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2018년 11월 20일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2018년 11월 20일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
2018년 11월 23일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2019년 12월 11일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2019년 12월 9일
마지막으로 확인됨
2019년 12월 1일
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .