- ICH GCP
- Rejestr badań klinicznych w USA
- Badanie kliniczne NCT03750526
Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
9 grudnia 2019 zaktualizowane przez: Lai chien hung, Taipei Medical University Hospital
Investigate the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Technology in Persons With Stroke
This study is to investigate the combined effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Augmented Reality (AR) intervention on cortical excitability, balance, gait, activity in individuals with stroke.
Forty participants will be recruited in this study.
They will be allocated to four group: rTMS and AR group (10), sham rTMS and AR group (10), AR group (10), and conventional physiotherapy group (10).
Przegląd badań
Status
Nieznany
Warunki
Szczegółowy opis
Participants will be randomized allocated to four groups: rTMS and AR group, sham rTMS and AR group, AR group ,and conventional physiotherapy group in current study.
All participants underwent four weeks, 3 sessions per week, and 60 minutes per session training program.
Motor evoked potential (MEP), Time up go test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT),The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS), and Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) will be assessed before and after intervention in all participants.
Typ studiów
Interwencyjne
Zapisy (Oczekiwany)
40
Faza
- Nie dotyczy
Kontakty i lokalizacje
Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.
Lokalizacje studiów
-
-
-
Taipei, Tajwan
- Rekrutacyjny
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
-
-
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
20 lat do 80 lat (Dorosły, Starszy dorosły)
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Nie
Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki
Wszystko
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive ability is sufficient to understand the nature of study (Mini-Mental State Examination score was above 23).
- Participants suffer from unilateral hemiplegia caused by a first-ever stroke.
- Participants are stable in medical and psychological condition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants have other neurologic problems that can affect balance and walking ability.
- Participants take of drugs or have other medical condition that can affect balance and function.
- Participants have contraindications for rTMS intervention such as pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal in the brain or skull, open wound of brain, or history of epilepsy.
Plan studiów
Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
- Główny cel: Leczenie
- Przydział: Randomizowane
- Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
- Maskowanie: Pojedynczy
Broń i interwencje
Grupa uczestników / Arm |
Interwencja / Leczenie |
|---|---|
|
Eksperymentalny: rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group A will undergo repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (real, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
|
rTMS performs 1Hz,15 minutes real rTMS.
AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
|
|
Aktywny komparator: Sham rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group B will receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (sham,1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
|
Sham rTMS applies 1Hz, 15 minutes sham rTMS.
AR intervention includes weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
|
|
Aktywny komparator: AR group
Ten participants in group C will undergo augmented reality exercise 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
|
AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 60 minutes.
|
|
Aktywny komparator: Conventional physiotherapy group
Ten participants allocated to the group D will receive conventional physiotherapy 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
|
Conventional physiotherapy includes rolling, sitting, balance exercise, standing, overground walking, facilitation of the paretic limbs, and so on for 60 minutes.
|
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Time Up Go test (TUG)
Ramy czasowe: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
The TUG test will ask participants to stand up, walk for 3 m, turn, walk back and sit down as fast as they can during the test, and the time requires for each patient to complete the test is recorded.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Ramy czasowe: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Participants performed a series of 14 functional balance tasks, including maintaining a quiet stance, sitting-to-standing, shifting weight and reaching, turning in place, standing on one leg, and maintaining a tandem stance.
Each task was scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (from 0 to 4).
A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 4 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion.
The highest possible score is 56.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Motor evoked potential (MEP)
Ramy czasowe: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Motor evoked potential (MEP) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following direct transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex.
All TMS is delivered with the participant seated upright on the chair.
Both passive and active conditions, participants are instructed to relax their right leg in the seated position.
TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom).
To locate the optimal site, stimuli are delivered over various points along the M1.
The optimal site is the location on the M1 that evoked the greatest MEP amplitude in the bilateral tibialis anterior muscles.
The onset latency and onset to peak amplitude will be assessed.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)-Lower extremity
Ramy czasowe: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower extremity is used to measure lower-limb recovery in stroke rehabilitation studies.The scale has 6 items ranging from reflex activity to voluntary motor control.
Each item further comprises components, with a total of 17. Scoring is done on a 3-point ordinal scale ranges from 0 (no performance) to 2 (faultless performance).
The total score range from 0 (no motor function) to 34 (good motor recovery).
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT)
Ramy czasowe: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Participants will be required to reach in the forward, left and right directions.
The test is performed with the participant in standing.
It is the measure of the difference, in centimeters, between arm's length with arms at 90° flexion/ abduction and maximal forward, left and right directions reaching respectively, using a fixed base of support.
The test uses a centimeters measuring device against a wall at shoulder height.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)
Ramy czasowe: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) is a postural assessment scale specifically designed to assess and monitor postural control after stroke.
It contains 12 four-level items of varying difficulty for assessing ability to maintain or change a given lying, sitting, or standing posture.
The PASS consists of 2 sections with a 4-point scale to describe each task.
The total score ranges from 0 - 36.
A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 3 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion.
The highest possible score is 36.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ)
Ramy czasowe: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) contains 18 items to screen the situation of depression within a week.
The TDQ, which is a 4-point scale with 18 items, is a culturally specific depression self-rating instrument for effective screening of depression in Taiwan and has satisfactory reliability and validity.
Subjects are guided to rate each item on a scale from 0 to 3 on the basis of "how often you felt the physical and emotional aspects during the past week".
Zero denotes never, three means always.
TDQ scores range from 0 to 54.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.
Daty zapisu na studia
Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
31 lipca 2018
Zakończenie podstawowe (Oczekiwany)
30 października 2020
Ukończenie studiów (Oczekiwany)
30 grudnia 2020
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
20 listopada 2018
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
20 listopada 2018
Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)
23 listopada 2018
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
11 grudnia 2019
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
9 grudnia 2019
Ostatnia weryfikacja
1 grudnia 2019
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Słowa kluczowe
Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- N201703084
Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze
Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Nie
Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Nie
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .