Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

9 dicembre 2019 aggiornato da: Lai chien hung, Taipei Medical University Hospital

Investigate the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Technology in Persons With Stroke

This study is to investigate the combined effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Augmented Reality (AR) intervention on cortical excitability, balance, gait, activity in individuals with stroke. Forty participants will be recruited in this study. They will be allocated to four group: rTMS and AR group (10), sham rTMS and AR group (10), AR group (10), and conventional physiotherapy group (10).

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Participants will be randomized allocated to four groups: rTMS and AR group, sham rTMS and AR group, AR group ,and conventional physiotherapy group in current study. All participants underwent four weeks, 3 sessions per week, and 60 minutes per session training program. Motor evoked potential (MEP), Time up go test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT),The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS), and Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) will be assessed before and after intervention in all participants.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Anticipato)

40

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Reclutamento
        • Taipei Medical University Hospital

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 20 anni a 80 anni (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognitive ability is sufficient to understand the nature of study (Mini-Mental State Examination score was above 23).
  2. Participants suffer from unilateral hemiplegia caused by a first-ever stroke.
  3. Participants are stable in medical and psychological condition.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants have other neurologic problems that can affect balance and walking ability.
  2. Participants take of drugs or have other medical condition that can affect balance and function.
  3. Participants have contraindications for rTMS intervention such as pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal in the brain or skull, open wound of brain, or history of epilepsy.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group A will undergo repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (real, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
rTMS performs 1Hz,15 minutes real rTMS. AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
Comparatore attivo: Sham rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group B will receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (sham,1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
Sham rTMS applies 1Hz, 15 minutes sham rTMS. AR intervention includes weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
Comparatore attivo: AR group
Ten participants in group C will undergo augmented reality exercise 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 60 minutes.
Comparatore attivo: Conventional physiotherapy group
Ten participants allocated to the group D will receive conventional physiotherapy 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
Conventional physiotherapy includes rolling, sitting, balance exercise, standing, overground walking, facilitation of the paretic limbs, and so on for 60 minutes.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change of Time Up Go test (TUG)
Lasso di tempo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
The TUG test will ask participants to stand up, walk for 3 m, turn, walk back and sit down as fast as they can during the test, and the time requires for each patient to complete the test is recorded.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Lasso di tempo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Participants performed a series of 14 functional balance tasks, including maintaining a quiet stance, sitting-to-standing, shifting weight and reaching, turning in place, standing on one leg, and maintaining a tandem stance. Each task was scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (from 0 to 4). A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 4 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion. The highest possible score is 56.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of Motor evoked potential (MEP)
Lasso di tempo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Motor evoked potential (MEP) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following direct transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex. All TMS is delivered with the participant seated upright on the chair. Both passive and active conditions, participants are instructed to relax their right leg in the seated position. TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom). To locate the optimal site, stimuli are delivered over various points along the M1. The optimal site is the location on the M1 that evoked the greatest MEP amplitude in the bilateral tibialis anterior muscles. The onset latency and onset to peak amplitude will be assessed.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)-Lower extremity
Lasso di tempo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower extremity is used to measure lower-limb recovery in stroke rehabilitation studies.The scale has 6 items ranging from reflex activity to voluntary motor control. Each item further comprises components, with a total of 17. Scoring is done on a 3-point ordinal scale ranges from 0 (no performance) to 2 (faultless performance). The total score range from 0 (no motor function) to 34 (good motor recovery).
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT)
Lasso di tempo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Participants will be required to reach in the forward, left and right directions. The test is performed with the participant in standing. It is the measure of the difference, in centimeters, between arm's length with arms at 90° flexion/ abduction and maximal forward, left and right directions reaching respectively, using a fixed base of support. The test uses a centimeters measuring device against a wall at shoulder height.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)
Lasso di tempo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) is a postural assessment scale specifically designed to assess and monitor postural control after stroke. It contains 12 four-level items of varying difficulty for assessing ability to maintain or change a given lying, sitting, or standing posture. The PASS consists of 2 sections with a 4-point scale to describe each task. The total score ranges from 0 - 36. A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 3 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion. The highest possible score is 36.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ)
Lasso di tempo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) contains 18 items to screen the situation of depression within a week. The TDQ, which is a 4-point scale with 18 items, is a culturally specific depression self-rating instrument for effective screening of depression in Taiwan and has satisfactory reliability and validity. Subjects are guided to rate each item on a scale from 0 to 3 on the basis of "how often you felt the physical and emotional aspects during the past week". Zero denotes never, three means always. TDQ scores range from 0 to 54.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

31 luglio 2018

Completamento primario (Anticipato)

30 ottobre 2020

Completamento dello studio (Anticipato)

30 dicembre 2020

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

20 novembre 2018

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

20 novembre 2018

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

23 novembre 2018

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

11 dicembre 2019

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

9 dicembre 2019

Ultimo verificato

1 dicembre 2019

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su rTMS and AR

3
Sottoscrivi