- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT03750526
Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
9. december 2019 opdateret af: Lai chien hung, Taipei Medical University Hospital
Investigate the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Technology in Persons With Stroke
This study is to investigate the combined effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Augmented Reality (AR) intervention on cortical excitability, balance, gait, activity in individuals with stroke.
Forty participants will be recruited in this study.
They will be allocated to four group: rTMS and AR group (10), sham rTMS and AR group (10), AR group (10), and conventional physiotherapy group (10).
Studieoversigt
Status
Ukendt
Betingelser
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Participants will be randomized allocated to four groups: rTMS and AR group, sham rTMS and AR group, AR group ,and conventional physiotherapy group in current study.
All participants underwent four weeks, 3 sessions per week, and 60 minutes per session training program.
Motor evoked potential (MEP), Time up go test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT),The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS), and Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) will be assessed before and after intervention in all participants.
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Forventet)
40
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan
- Rekruttering
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
20 år til 80 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ingen
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive ability is sufficient to understand the nature of study (Mini-Mental State Examination score was above 23).
- Participants suffer from unilateral hemiplegia caused by a first-ever stroke.
- Participants are stable in medical and psychological condition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants have other neurologic problems that can affect balance and walking ability.
- Participants take of drugs or have other medical condition that can affect balance and function.
- Participants have contraindications for rTMS intervention such as pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal in the brain or skull, open wound of brain, or history of epilepsy.
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Enkelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group A will undergo repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (real, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
|
rTMS performs 1Hz,15 minutes real rTMS.
AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Sham rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group B will receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (sham,1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
|
Sham rTMS applies 1Hz, 15 minutes sham rTMS.
AR intervention includes weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: AR group
Ten participants in group C will undergo augmented reality exercise 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
|
AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 60 minutes.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Conventional physiotherapy group
Ten participants allocated to the group D will receive conventional physiotherapy 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
|
Conventional physiotherapy includes rolling, sitting, balance exercise, standing, overground walking, facilitation of the paretic limbs, and so on for 60 minutes.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Time Up Go test (TUG)
Tidsramme: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
The TUG test will ask participants to stand up, walk for 3 m, turn, walk back and sit down as fast as they can during the test, and the time requires for each patient to complete the test is recorded.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Tidsramme: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Participants performed a series of 14 functional balance tasks, including maintaining a quiet stance, sitting-to-standing, shifting weight and reaching, turning in place, standing on one leg, and maintaining a tandem stance.
Each task was scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (from 0 to 4).
A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 4 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion.
The highest possible score is 56.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Motor evoked potential (MEP)
Tidsramme: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Motor evoked potential (MEP) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following direct transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex.
All TMS is delivered with the participant seated upright on the chair.
Both passive and active conditions, participants are instructed to relax their right leg in the seated position.
TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom).
To locate the optimal site, stimuli are delivered over various points along the M1.
The optimal site is the location on the M1 that evoked the greatest MEP amplitude in the bilateral tibialis anterior muscles.
The onset latency and onset to peak amplitude will be assessed.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)-Lower extremity
Tidsramme: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower extremity is used to measure lower-limb recovery in stroke rehabilitation studies.The scale has 6 items ranging from reflex activity to voluntary motor control.
Each item further comprises components, with a total of 17. Scoring is done on a 3-point ordinal scale ranges from 0 (no performance) to 2 (faultless performance).
The total score range from 0 (no motor function) to 34 (good motor recovery).
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT)
Tidsramme: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Participants will be required to reach in the forward, left and right directions.
The test is performed with the participant in standing.
It is the measure of the difference, in centimeters, between arm's length with arms at 90° flexion/ abduction and maximal forward, left and right directions reaching respectively, using a fixed base of support.
The test uses a centimeters measuring device against a wall at shoulder height.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)
Tidsramme: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) is a postural assessment scale specifically designed to assess and monitor postural control after stroke.
It contains 12 four-level items of varying difficulty for assessing ability to maintain or change a given lying, sitting, or standing posture.
The PASS consists of 2 sections with a 4-point scale to describe each task.
The total score ranges from 0 - 36.
A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 3 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion.
The highest possible score is 36.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
|
Change of Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ)
Tidsramme: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) contains 18 items to screen the situation of depression within a week.
The TDQ, which is a 4-point scale with 18 items, is a culturally specific depression self-rating instrument for effective screening of depression in Taiwan and has satisfactory reliability and validity.
Subjects are guided to rate each item on a scale from 0 to 3 on the basis of "how often you felt the physical and emotional aspects during the past week".
Zero denotes never, three means always.
TDQ scores range from 0 to 54.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
31. juli 2018
Primær færdiggørelse (Forventet)
30. oktober 2020
Studieafslutning (Forventet)
30. december 2020
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
20. november 2018
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
20. november 2018
Først opslået (Faktiske)
23. november 2018
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
11. december 2019
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
9. december 2019
Sidst verificeret
1. december 2019
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- N201703084
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Ingen
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Ingen
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .