Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

9 de dezembro de 2019 atualizado por: Lai chien hung, Taipei Medical University Hospital

Investigate the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Technology in Persons With Stroke

This study is to investigate the combined effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Augmented Reality (AR) intervention on cortical excitability, balance, gait, activity in individuals with stroke. Forty participants will be recruited in this study. They will be allocated to four group: rTMS and AR group (10), sham rTMS and AR group (10), AR group (10), and conventional physiotherapy group (10).

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Participants will be randomized allocated to four groups: rTMS and AR group, sham rTMS and AR group, AR group ,and conventional physiotherapy group in current study. All participants underwent four weeks, 3 sessions per week, and 60 minutes per session training program. Motor evoked potential (MEP), Time up go test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT),The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS), and Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) will be assessed before and after intervention in all participants.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Antecipado)

40

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Recrutamento
        • Taipei Medical University Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

20 anos a 80 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognitive ability is sufficient to understand the nature of study (Mini-Mental State Examination score was above 23).
  2. Participants suffer from unilateral hemiplegia caused by a first-ever stroke.
  3. Participants are stable in medical and psychological condition.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants have other neurologic problems that can affect balance and walking ability.
  2. Participants take of drugs or have other medical condition that can affect balance and function.
  3. Participants have contraindications for rTMS intervention such as pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal in the brain or skull, open wound of brain, or history of epilepsy.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group A will undergo repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (real, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
rTMS performs 1Hz,15 minutes real rTMS. AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
Comparador Ativo: Sham rTMS and AR group
Ten participants in group B will receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (sham,1 Hz, 15 minutes), follow by a session of augmented reality exercise (45 minutes), 3 days per week for 4 weeks.
Sham rTMS applies 1Hz, 15 minutes sham rTMS. AR intervention includes weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 45 minutes.
Comparador Ativo: AR group
Ten participants in group C will undergo augmented reality exercise 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
AR intervention contains weight-shift exercise, strengthening of lower limb and balance training for 60 minutes.
Comparador Ativo: Conventional physiotherapy group
Ten participants allocated to the group D will receive conventional physiotherapy 60 minutes a day and 3 days per week for four weeks.
Conventional physiotherapy includes rolling, sitting, balance exercise, standing, overground walking, facilitation of the paretic limbs, and so on for 60 minutes.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change of Time Up Go test (TUG)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
The TUG test will ask participants to stand up, walk for 3 m, turn, walk back and sit down as fast as they can during the test, and the time requires for each patient to complete the test is recorded.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Participants performed a series of 14 functional balance tasks, including maintaining a quiet stance, sitting-to-standing, shifting weight and reaching, turning in place, standing on one leg, and maintaining a tandem stance. Each task was scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (from 0 to 4). A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 4 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion. The highest possible score is 56.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of Motor evoked potential (MEP)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Motor evoked potential (MEP) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following direct transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex. All TMS is delivered with the participant seated upright on the chair. Both passive and active conditions, participants are instructed to relax their right leg in the seated position. TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom). To locate the optimal site, stimuli are delivered over various points along the M1. The optimal site is the location on the M1 that evoked the greatest MEP amplitude in the bilateral tibialis anterior muscles. The onset latency and onset to peak amplitude will be assessed.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)-Lower extremity
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower extremity is used to measure lower-limb recovery in stroke rehabilitation studies.The scale has 6 items ranging from reflex activity to voluntary motor control. Each item further comprises components, with a total of 17. Scoring is done on a 3-point ordinal scale ranges from 0 (no performance) to 2 (faultless performance). The total score range from 0 (no motor function) to 34 (good motor recovery).
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Participants will be required to reach in the forward, left and right directions. The test is performed with the participant in standing. It is the measure of the difference, in centimeters, between arm's length with arms at 90° flexion/ abduction and maximal forward, left and right directions reaching respectively, using a fixed base of support. The test uses a centimeters measuring device against a wall at shoulder height.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) is a postural assessment scale specifically designed to assess and monitor postural control after stroke. It contains 12 four-level items of varying difficulty for assessing ability to maintain or change a given lying, sitting, or standing posture. The PASS consists of 2 sections with a 4-point scale to describe each task. The total score ranges from 0 - 36. A score of 0 denotes the inability of the participant to perform the task, and a score of 3 denotes that the participant can complete the task based on a preset criterion. The highest possible score is 36.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Change of Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ)
Prazo: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups
Taiwanese Depression Questionnaires (TDQ) contains 18 items to screen the situation of depression within a week. The TDQ, which is a 4-point scale with 18 items, is a culturally specific depression self-rating instrument for effective screening of depression in Taiwan and has satisfactory reliability and validity. Subjects are guided to rate each item on a scale from 0 to 3 on the basis of "how often you felt the physical and emotional aspects during the past week". Zero denotes never, three means always. TDQ scores range from 0 to 54.
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in four groups

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

31 de julho de 2018

Conclusão Primária (Antecipado)

30 de outubro de 2020

Conclusão do estudo (Antecipado)

30 de dezembro de 2020

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

20 de novembro de 2018

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

20 de novembro de 2018

Primeira postagem (Real)

23 de novembro de 2018

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

11 de dezembro de 2019

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

9 de dezembro de 2019

Última verificação

1 de dezembro de 2019

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever