- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07582679
Polypropylene Versus Polyglactin in Upper Limb Subcuticular Skin Closure
Polypropylene Versus Polyglactin in Upper Limb Subcuticular Skin Closure: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
Background and Rationale Although previous studies have compared absorbable and non-absorbable sutures, most did not specifically evaluate standardized scar outcomes for subcuticular closure in the upper limb. While upper limb wounds may not carry the same aesthetic priority as facial wounds, scars in this region are highly visible and can adversely affect patients' psychological well-being. Subcuticular suturing is commonly used to improve cosmetic outcomes and reduce wound complications. Both Polypropylene (non-absorbable) and Polyglactin (absorbable) are widely used materials, yet their comparative performance in subcuticular skin closure remains controversial.
Aim and Objectives
Primary objective:
- To compare cosmetic outcomes of subcuticular skin closure using Polypropylene and Polyglactin
Secondary objectives:
- To compare postoperative wound complication rates (including infection, wound dehiscence, and hematoma formation) between polypropylene and polyglactin sutures
- To assess patient-reported discomfort and satisfaction associated with each suture material
- To assess the influence of the nature of surgery (elective vs trauma) on wound healing outcomes for each suture type
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: Mohamed Elsaid Hamisa
- 전화번호: +201092248136
- 이메일: mohamedhamisa442@gmail.com
연구 장소
-
-
-
Menoufia Governorate, 이집트, 33511
- 모병
- Shebin El Koum teaching Hospital
-
연락하다:
- Mohamed Elsaid Hamisa
- 전화번호: +201092248136
- 이메일: mohamedhamisa442@gmail.com
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged ≥18 years
- Patients undergoing any surgical procedure involving the upper limb
- Procedures performed in either elective or emergency settings
- Wounds suitable for primary subcuticular skin closure
- Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Heavily contaminated or infected wounds
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic steroid use, immunosuppression or peripheral vascular disease
- Crush injuries and wounds with significant tissue loss
- Known allergy to suture material
- Delayed primary closure wounds
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Cosmetic outcome measured using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) total score (range 6-60)
기간: Baseline
|
Scar quality will be evaluated using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), which includes both patient-reported and observer-reported components.
Each item is scored from 1 to 10, with total scores ranging from 6 to 60, where lower scores indicate better cosmetic outcome.
|
Baseline
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) (number and percentage of patients)
기간: Baseline
|
Surgical site infection will be assessed based on clinical criteria including the presence of purulent discharge, localized swelling, erythema, warmth, or wound dehiscence, with or without positive bacterial culture.
The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of patients who develop SSI during the follow-up period.
|
Baseline
|
|
Incidence of wound dehiscence (number and percentage of patients)
기간: Baseline
|
Wound dehiscence will be defined as partial or complete separation of the surgical wound edges after closure.
The outcome will be assessed clinically during follow-up visits and reported as the number and percentage of patients who develop wound dehiscence.
|
Baseline
|
|
Incidence of hematoma formation (number and percentage of patients)
기간: Baseline
|
Hematoma formation will be defined as a localized collection of blood at the surgical site, identified clinically by swelling, discoloration, or tension, with or without the need for evacuation.
The outcome will be assessed during follow-up and reported as the number and percentage of patients who develop a hematoma.
|
Baseline
|
|
Patient satisfaction measured using a 5-point Likert scale (score range 1-5)
기간: Baseline
|
Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates very dissatisfied and 5 indicates very satisfied.
The outcome will be reported as a numerical score reflecting the patient's overall satisfaction with the surgical result.
|
Baseline
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.
- Hanna AJ, Sonnier JH, Coladonato C, Destine H, Wilson S, Ciccotti MG, Tjoumakaris FP, Freedman KB. Greater Patient Satisfaction With Use of Nonabsorbable Sutures Compared to Absorbable Sutures for Skin Closure Following Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Nov 10;5(6):100814. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100814. eCollection 2023 Dec.
- Ramadan MS, Elhosseiny AS, Sabaa HA, Nassar SA. Evaluation of the effect of subcuticular skin closure with absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), versus non-absorbable suture, polypropylene (Prolene), on the risk of wound infection and complications after caesarean section. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2025;118(Suppl_1):hcaf224.173. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaf224.173
- Hasdemir PS, Guvenal T, Ozcakir HT, Koyuncu FM, Dinc Horasan G, Erkan M, Oruc Koltan S. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Materials in Cesarean Skin Closure. Surg Res Pract. 2015;2015:141203. doi: 10.1155/2015/141203. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- Polypropylene vs Polyglactin
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형
- 연구_프로토콜
- ICF
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .