- ICH GCP
- Register voor klinische proeven in de VS.
- Klinische proef NCT07582679
Polypropylene Versus Polyglactin in Upper Limb Subcuticular Skin Closure
Polypropylene Versus Polyglactin in Upper Limb Subcuticular Skin Closure: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
Background and Rationale Although previous studies have compared absorbable and non-absorbable sutures, most did not specifically evaluate standardized scar outcomes for subcuticular closure in the upper limb. While upper limb wounds may not carry the same aesthetic priority as facial wounds, scars in this region are highly visible and can adversely affect patients' psychological well-being. Subcuticular suturing is commonly used to improve cosmetic outcomes and reduce wound complications. Both Polypropylene (non-absorbable) and Polyglactin (absorbable) are widely used materials, yet their comparative performance in subcuticular skin closure remains controversial.
Aim and Objectives
Primary objective:
- To compare cosmetic outcomes of subcuticular skin closure using Polypropylene and Polyglactin
Secondary objectives:
- To compare postoperative wound complication rates (including infection, wound dehiscence, and hematoma formation) between polypropylene and polyglactin sutures
- To assess patient-reported discomfort and satisfaction associated with each suture material
- To assess the influence of the nature of surgery (elective vs trauma) on wound healing outcomes for each suture type
Studietype
Inschrijving (Geschat)
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
Studiecontact
- Naam: Mohamed Elsaid Hamisa
- Telefoonnummer: +201092248136
- E-mail: mohamedhamisa442@gmail.com
Studie Locaties
-
-
-
Menoufia Governorate, Egypte, 33511
- Werving
- Shebin El Koum teaching Hospital
-
Contact:
- Mohamed Elsaid Hamisa
- Telefoonnummer: +201092248136
- E-mail: mohamedhamisa442@gmail.com
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
- Volwassen
- Oudere volwassene
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged ≥18 years
- Patients undergoing any surgical procedure involving the upper limb
- Procedures performed in either elective or emergency settings
- Wounds suitable for primary subcuticular skin closure
- Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Heavily contaminated or infected wounds
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic steroid use, immunosuppression or peripheral vascular disease
- Crush injuries and wounds with significant tissue loss
- Known allergy to suture material
- Delayed primary closure wounds
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Behandeling
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Enkel
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Cosmetic outcome measured using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) total score (range 6-60)
Tijdsspanne: Baseline
|
Scar quality will be evaluated using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), which includes both patient-reported and observer-reported components.
Each item is scored from 1 to 10, with total scores ranging from 6 to 60, where lower scores indicate better cosmetic outcome.
|
Baseline
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) (number and percentage of patients)
Tijdsspanne: Baseline
|
Surgical site infection will be assessed based on clinical criteria including the presence of purulent discharge, localized swelling, erythema, warmth, or wound dehiscence, with or without positive bacterial culture.
The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of patients who develop SSI during the follow-up period.
|
Baseline
|
|
Incidence of wound dehiscence (number and percentage of patients)
Tijdsspanne: Baseline
|
Wound dehiscence will be defined as partial or complete separation of the surgical wound edges after closure.
The outcome will be assessed clinically during follow-up visits and reported as the number and percentage of patients who develop wound dehiscence.
|
Baseline
|
|
Incidence of hematoma formation (number and percentage of patients)
Tijdsspanne: Baseline
|
Hematoma formation will be defined as a localized collection of blood at the surgical site, identified clinically by swelling, discoloration, or tension, with or without the need for evacuation.
The outcome will be assessed during follow-up and reported as the number and percentage of patients who develop a hematoma.
|
Baseline
|
|
Patient satisfaction measured using a 5-point Likert scale (score range 1-5)
Tijdsspanne: Baseline
|
Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates very dissatisfied and 5 indicates very satisfied.
The outcome will be reported as a numerical score reflecting the patient's overall satisfaction with the surgical result.
|
Baseline
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Sponsor
Publicaties en nuttige links
Algemene publicaties
- Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.
- Hanna AJ, Sonnier JH, Coladonato C, Destine H, Wilson S, Ciccotti MG, Tjoumakaris FP, Freedman KB. Greater Patient Satisfaction With Use of Nonabsorbable Sutures Compared to Absorbable Sutures for Skin Closure Following Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Nov 10;5(6):100814. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100814. eCollection 2023 Dec.
- Ramadan MS, Elhosseiny AS, Sabaa HA, Nassar SA. Evaluation of the effect of subcuticular skin closure with absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), versus non-absorbable suture, polypropylene (Prolene), on the risk of wound infection and complications after caesarean section. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2025;118(Suppl_1):hcaf224.173. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaf224.173
- Hasdemir PS, Guvenal T, Ozcakir HT, Koyuncu FM, Dinc Horasan G, Erkan M, Oruc Koltan S. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Materials in Cesarean Skin Closure. Surg Res Pract. 2015;2015:141203. doi: 10.1155/2015/141203. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Geschat)
Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)
Studie voltooiing (Geschat)
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- Polypropylene vs Polyglactin
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
IPD delen Ondersteunend informatietype
- LEERPROTOCOOL
- ICF
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .