- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07637409
Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for School Teachers' Well-being and Social Skills (EduSocSchool2)
Edu:Social School Study2: Promoting Well-being and Socio-emotional Skills for School Teachers With App-based Mindfulness and Dyadic Empathy-compassion Trainings.
The Edu:Social School Study 2 is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an 8-week socio-emotional, partner-based empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo) compared with a mindfulness-based training (MBT) and a waitlist control group (WLC) in school teachers.
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the adapted 8-week online EmCo Dyad training program across multiple domains of teacher functioning. Seven domains capture individual-level outcomes: (1) mental health, (2) resilience, (3) attention and cognitive processes, (4) social emotions, (5) stress coping and emotion regulation, (6) listening skills, and (7) voice-based emotional expression (DYVA). Two additional domains assess broader contextual outcomes: (8) classroom teaching and (9) organizational/school level outcomes, reflecting how individual-level changes may translate into perceived changes in the teaching and school context.
To this end, participants will be randomized into one of three groups: (1) an 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention (EmCo), (2) an 8-week mindfulness-based training program (MBT), or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC) that will receive the EmCo intervention after completion of the initial post-test. Both interventions are delivered online via a dedicated study application to ensure scalability and accessibility.
A second aim is to validate the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) as a measure of teachers' perceived social interactions and network structures. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial in teachers to examine whether changes in internal psychological processes are associated with perceived changes in the perception of the quality of interaction between school teachers and their students in the classroom as well as between school teachers and their colleagues in school.
A third aim is to introduce and validate objective measures of emotional processing based on AI-based voice analysis in educational field research. Specifically, the study will evaluate two tasks using different parameters of AI-based emotional voice analysis: (a) the Teacher Voice Assessment (TEAVA), in which teachers' voices are recorded during a teaching-related task, and (b) the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA), conducted during the daily partner-based Dyad practice. In both tasks, non-semantic vocal features (e.g., pitch, loudness, speaking rate, intonation) and vocal emotional expressions (e.g., arousal, valence, dominance, and basic emotional categories) will be analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. No speech content will be transcribed or analyzed.
A final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying intervention-related changes. Based on prior research, the EmCo Dyad training is expected to enhance care- and affiliation-related motivational systems associated with positive affect, social emotions and connectedness, and prosocial behavior, while reducing loneliness, social stress, and other forms of psychological vulnerability. In contrast, mindfulness-based training is expected to primarily strengthen attention- and thought-related processes, including present-moment awareness, calming the mind and executive attentional control. These mechanisms are expected to contribute to improvements in mental health and overall well-being across both intervention groups.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
The teaching profession is widely recognized as highly demanding, and teachers report elevated rates of stress and burnout. If left unaddressed, burnout adversely affects teachers' health, job performance, teaching quality, and school turnover rates. Moreover, teacher burnout has important consequences for students. Teachers' emotional exhaustion has been shown to negatively affect students' academic achievement and self-concept in Germany. Given teachers' pivotal role in shaping children's socio-emotional development, addressing psychological vulnerability-including stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and exhaustion-is essential. Strengthening resilience enables teachers to maintain well-being and effective classroom functioning in the face of adversity by supporting adaptive stress management. In addition, strong interpersonal skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening play an important role in the teacher-student communication. Addressing psychological vulnerability and strengthening resilience and social skills, is essential not only for teacher well-being but also for the functioning of educational systems broadly.
In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices (Dyads), which specifically target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, social connectedness and different types of listening. However, dyadic interventions, that is daily mental practices done with a partner, have not yet been systematically investigated in educational settings. Existing evidence suggests that contemplative Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, enhancing social connection, and strengthening resilience. Moreover, dyadic practices appear to engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.
Empathy, (self-)compassion, and high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in school contexts. However, empathy may lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective due to its association with positive affect and prosocial motivation. To address this distinction, the Edu:Social School Study 2 implements an empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains participants in empathic listening and emotion regulation during the first four weeks, followed by (self-)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.
The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. These two large-scale mental training studies, have shown that different types of practices produce distinct effects on psychological and biological outcomes. The ReSource project, a 9-month longitudinal study using behavioral, hormonal, autonomic and neuroimaging (fMRI) measures, compared three training modules, including a mindfulness-based "Presence" module, a socio-affective "Affect" module (including the Affect Dyad) and a socio-cognitive "Perspective" module, and demonstrated that training content differentially affects mind, behavior and brain. Building on this work, the CovSocial project implemented a 10-week fully online design comparing a low-dose purely online socio-emotional Dyad training with a mindfulness-based active control training group. Results showed both shared and distinct effects: while both interventions improved mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and compassion, the Dyad training showed stronger effects on resilience, positivity bias, social connectedness, and reductions in loneliness and social stress.
Further, mediation analyses suggest that individual mindfulness practices and partner-based Dyadic practices influence well-being through partly distinct psychological mechanisms, whereas care-based motivational processes could account for Dyad-practice effects and thought-related process for mindfulness-practice effects.
Compared with these prior interventions, the present Edu:Social School intervention program introduces a novel empathy versus compassion listening component and reduces the duration from 10 to 8 weeks, improving feasibility within applied school settings. In an initial Edu:Social School pilot study, 120 teachers participated in a 10-week socio-emotional training program (EmCo). The pilot demonstrated high compliance and provided preliminary evidence for reductions in psychological vulnerability. However, the study lacked an active control group and a reliable waitlist control group, limiting interpretation. In addition, the 10-week duration was difficult to implement within the German school calendar.
The present study is a randomized controlled trial in a sample of school teachers (target N = 900). A multimethod assessment approach will be used, including validated trait and state self-report questionnaires, behavioral phone-based tasks administered via an app application, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered through smartphone notifications. These different assessments are capturing changes across the nine domains mentioned before.
After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) an empathy-compassion training group (EmCo), based on the Affect Dyad daily mental practice; (2) a mindfulness-based training group, based on attention-based mindfulness practices; or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC). All participants will first complete a pre-test assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, phone-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention groups will then be onboarded through two group-specific online sessions (Onboarding I and II) led by trained instructors, followed by participation in their respective 8-week programs delivered via a dedicated web and smartphone application. These programs include daily partner-based Dyad practices or mindfulness meditations, respectively, as well as weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. Throughout the intervention period, participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR) to assess changes in key psychological and social processes, which will be examined as potential mediators. At the end of the intervention, all participants will complete a post-test assessment phase comparable to the pre-test (T0) and mid-test (TM), with the addition of a final feedback questionnaire.
Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the waitlist control group will subsequently receive the same 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo) and complete an additional mid-tests (TM1) and post-test assessment (T2). After both training groups (EmCo and MBT) have completed their respective interventions, participants will be offered the opportunity to continue their practice via the study app. Participants in the EmCo group will be invited to continue the Dyad practice, whereas participants in the MBT group may choose to continue either the mindfulness-based practice or switch to the EmCo Dyad intervention. This phase of voluntary continued practice will take place in parallel with the 8-week EmCo Dyad training offered to the WLC following post-test.
The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at https://osf.io/x59pk
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: Lab Manager Social Neuroscience Lab
- 전화번호: +49 30 209346-180
- 이메일: office@social.mpg.de
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 18- and 68-years old.
- Currently working as a school teacher in Germany or Austria; grades 1-12; primary, secondary, special needs, and vocational schools.
- Proficient in German.
- Informed consent.
- No symptoms of psychiatric disease within the past two years; healthy population, non-clinical population.
- Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).
- No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Insufficient German proficiency.
- Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).
- No informed consent.
- Not currently working as a school teacher.
- Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).
Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Martin et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2004; Cutoff ≥ 20; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15),
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)
- In addition, participants will complete the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003) which is not used as quantitative exclusion criteria in step 3, but provides additional information to support the phone call with one of the teachers, as part of the screening process.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 기초 과학
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
The socio-emotional intervention will consist of two 1.5h online onboarding I and II sessions and then 8 weeks of weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert teachers as well as daily dyad practice with a partner over 8 week.
|
|
|
활성 비교기: Mindfulness-based Training (MBT)
MBT includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily mindfulness practice over 8 weeks.
|
|
|
다른: Waitlist Control Group (WLC)
WLC receives EmCo training only after both intervention groups complete their programs.
|
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
우울 불안 스트레스 척도 (DASS-21)
기간: 기준선(사전 검사)과 8주간의 중재 기간 후(사후 검사 1 & 2)에 평가됨
|
우울, 불안, 스트레스를 측정하는 척도 (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021).
점수가 높을수록 더 많은 우울, 불안, 스트레스를 나타냅니다.
|
기준선(사전 검사)과 8주간의 중재 기간 후(사후 검사 1 & 2)에 평가됨
|
|
UCLA 고독감 척도 (UCLA)
기간: 기준선(사전 검사) 및 8주간의 중재 기간 이후(사후 검사 1 및 2)에 평가됨
|
외로움의 심각성을 측정하는 척도(Döring & Bortz, 1993; Russell et al., 1980).
높은 점수는 더 많은 외로움을 나타냅니다. |
기준선(사전 검사) 및 8주간의 중재 기간 이후(사후 검사 1 및 2)에 평가됨
|
|
코너 데이비슨 회복력 척도 (CD-RISC)
기간: 기준선(사전 검사) 및 8주간의 중재 기간 후(사후 검사 1 및 2)에 평가됨
|
심리적 회복탄력성을 측정하는 척도 (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015).
점수가 높을수록 회복탄력성이 더 높음을 나타냅니다.
|
기준선(사전 검사) 및 8주간의 중재 기간 후(사후 검사 1 및 2)에 평가됨
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scale for Self and Others (SOCS)
기간: 기초 평가(사전 검사), 공감적 경청 훈련 4주 후(중간 중재), 자비로운 경청 훈련 4주 후(사후 검사 1 & 2)에 평가됨
|
자기 자비(SOCS-S)와 타인에 대한 자비(SOCS-O; Gu 외, 2020)를 측정하는 척도.
점수가 높을수록 더 많은 자비를 나타냅니다.
|
기초 평가(사전 검사), 공감적 경청 훈련 4주 후(중간 중재), 자비로운 경청 훈련 4주 후(사후 검사 1 & 2)에 평가됨
|
|
대처 전략
기간: 사전 검사(기준선)와 8주간의 중재 기간 후(중재 후)에, 2주 기간 내 4일 동안 하루에 다섯 번의 푸시 알림 측정으로 구성된 EMA 설계를 사용하여 평가하였으며, 각 측정은 3시간 간격으로 배분되었습니다.
|
Brief-COPE(Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005)와 인지적 정서조절 질문지(CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011)를 기반으로 한 맞춤 항목들로 대처 전략(수용, 긍정적 재해석, 사회적 지지, 반추, 자기 비난, 주의 분산)을 측정합니다.
높은 점수는 특정 대처 전략의 더 높은 사용을 나타냅니다.
|
사전 검사(기준선)와 8주간의 중재 기간 후(중재 후)에, 2주 기간 내 4일 동안 하루에 다섯 번의 푸시 알림 측정으로 구성된 EMA 설계를 사용하여 평가하였으며, 각 측정은 3시간 간격으로 배분되었습니다.
|
|
능동적 공감적 경청 척도 (AELS)
기간: 기준선(사전 테스트), 공감적 듣기 훈련 4주 후(중재 중), 그리고 자비로운 듣기 훈련 4주 후(사후 테스트 1 및 2)에 평가됨
|
능동적 공감적 경청을 측정하는 척도(Bodie, 2011).
높은 점수는 더 많은 능동적 공감적 경청을 나타냅니다.
|
기준선(사전 테스트), 공감적 듣기 훈련 4주 후(중재 중), 그리고 자비로운 듣기 훈련 4주 후(사후 테스트 1 및 2)에 평가됨
|
|
Prosodic Feature Pitch
기간: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Loudness
기간: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
기간: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Intonation
기간: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
기간: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software.
The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1).
Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
기간: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES)
기간: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000).
Higher scores indicate more burnout.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS)
기간: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring the frequency and intensity of three distinct types of positive emotions: Activated PA (excitement, energy), Relaxed PA (calm, peacefulness), and Safe/Contentment PA (safety, security) (Gilbert et al., 2008).
Higher scores indicate a greater frequency and intensity of experiencing specific types of positive emotions.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Executive control (Flanker Task; FT)
기간: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
This task assesses executive control with three indices reaction times (RT), error rates, and the flanker effect (FE) (Trautwein et al., 2016; 2020).
Faster RT, lower error rates and FE indicate higher cognitive control.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Mind-Wandering
기간: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
These two questions embedded in the flanker task assess mind-wandering during attentional performance (Smallwood, 2015).
Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT)
기간: Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
|
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Klimecki et al., 2014, 2013).
Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Stress intensity
기간: Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
|
Custom item based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990) measuring stress intensity.
Higher scores indicate more intense stress.
|
Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
|
|
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)
기간: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring psychological working conditions (stressors and coping resources) impact employee health and well-being (Kristensen et al., 2005; Nübling, 2005)
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP)
기간: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
The e-SNAP is a novel assessment paradigm based on the Affect Grid.
Teachers rate their interactions with both students and colleagues in terms of frequency and pleasantness in interactions.
In addition, teachers rate in both the student and colleague networks the relationships among each other, allowing to assess positive relations and network density.
Higher scores indicate more frequent and more positively experienced interactions, as well as more cohesive and positively connected social networks.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
긍정적 정서 (Affect Grid) (설명 기전)
기간: 8주간의 중재 과정 동안 매주 평가됨
|
정서 상태(가치)와 각성 평가(Russell et al., 1989).
가치와 각성 점수가 높을수록 더 긍정적인 정서와 높은 각성을 나타냅니다.
|
8주간의 중재 과정 동안 매주 평가됨
|
|
감사 설문지-6 (GQ-5-G) (설명적 메커니즘)
기간: 8주간의 과정에서 매주 평가됨
|
감사 측정 척도(Hudecek et al., 2021; McCullough et al., 2002).
점수가 높을수록 더 많은 감사를 나타냅니다.
|
8주간의 과정에서 매주 평가됨
|
|
자기-친절 척도 (SCS-SF) (설명 메커니즘)
기간: 8주 동안 매주 평가됨
|
자신에 대한 친절과 연민적인 태도를 측정하는 자가 보고 설문지(Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011).
높은 점수는 더 큰 자기 친절을 나타냅니다.
|
8주 동안 매주 평가됨
|
|
긍정적 해석 편향 (ERT) (설명적 기제)
기간: 기초선(사전 검사)에서 평가하고, 8주간의 중재 기간 후(사후 검사 1 및 2) 평가함
|
이 과제는 얼굴 표정의 형태 변형 시퀀스를 사용하여 사람들의 얼굴 표정을 더 긍정적으로 판단하는 경향을 평가합니다(DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015).
높은 점수는 더 강한 긍정적 해석 편향을 나타냅니다.
|
기초선(사전 검사)에서 평가하고, 8주간의 중재 기간 후(사후 검사 1 및 2) 평가함
|
|
단기 외로움 척도(SLS) (설명 메커니즘)
기간: 8주 동안 매주 평가됨
|
외로움의 빈도, 강도, 지속 시간을 측정하는 간단한 척도(Hughes 외, 2004; Qualter 외, 2021).
점수가 높을수록 더 많은 외로움을 나타냅니다.
|
8주 동안 매주 평가됨
|
|
우울증 (PHQ-2) (설명 메커니즘)
기간: 8주 동안 매주 평가됨
|
우울 기분과 무쾌감증(즐거움 상실)을 포함한 주요 우울 증상을 평가하는 간단한 자기 보고식 선별 척도입니다(Kroenke et al., 2003).
점수가 높을수록 우울 증상의 심각도가 더 큽니다.
|
8주 동안 매주 평가됨
|
|
공감적 관심 및 고통 (IRI) (설명 메커니즘)
기간: 8주 동안 매주 평가
|
개인적 고통과 공감적 관심을 포함한 다양한 사회적 감정의 측정 척도(Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009).
높은 점수는 더 높은 개인적 고통이나 공감적 관심을 나타냅니다. |
8주 동안 매주 평가
|
|
내집단-외집단 편향(ERT)(설명 메커니즘)
기간: 기준선(사전 테스트)과 8주간의 중재 기간 후(사후 테스트 1 & 2)에 평가됨
|
이 과제는 합성된 얼굴 표정 시퀀스를 사용하여 자신의 집단에 속한 사람들을 더 긍정적으로 평가하는 경향을 평가합니다(DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015).
높은 점수는 더 강한 내집단-외집단 편향을 나타냅니다.
|
기준선(사전 테스트)과 8주간의 중재 기간 후(사후 테스트 1 & 2)에 평가됨
|
|
대처 전략 (설명 메커니즘)
기간: 8주 동안 매주 평가됨
|
Brief-COPE(Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005)와 인지적 정서 조절 질문지(CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011)를 기반으로 한 맞춤 항목으로 대처 전략(수용, 긍정적 재해석, 사회적 지지, 반추, 자기 비난, 주의 분산)을 측정합니다.
높은 점수는 해당 대처 전략의 사용 빈도가 높음을 나타냅니다.
|
8주 동안 매주 평가됨
|
|
DPR-Affect (감정 격자; 설명 메커니즘)
기간: 중재 기간 동안 8주간 평가, 매일 운동 전
|
Dyad 시작 직전 정서 상태(가치)와 각성 평가(Russell et al., 1989).
가치와 각성 점수가 높을수록 긍정적 정서와 높은 각성을 나타냅니다.
|
중재 기간 동안 8주간 평가, 매일 운동 전
|
|
DPR-감정
기간: Dyad Voice Assessment(DYVA)의 일환으로 1주차부터 8주차까지 매주 평가됨
|
Dyad 직후에 Dyad의 발화자와 청취자가 평가한 감정 강도(예: 행복, 감사, 슬픔, 분노)
|
Dyad Voice Assessment(DYVA)의 일환으로 1주차부터 8주차까지 매주 평가됨
|
|
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
기간: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025).
Higher scores indicate greater emotion awareness and acceptance.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Perceived Stress (PSS-4) (explanatory mechanism)
기간: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
A self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Weekly Mind-Wandering (explanatory mechanism)
기간: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
These two questions assess mind-wandering in day-to-day life (Smallwood et al., 2013).
Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Weekly Thought Patterns (Cube of Thought) (explanatory mechanism)
기간: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
These three questions assess polarities of thought orientation or quality (self-other, past-future, pleasant-unpleasant) (Petzold et al. 2023).
Higher scores indicate a higher level in each respective dimension.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
DPR-involvement (explanatory mechanism)
기간: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
Assessment of listening involvement (1 custom item; only post-Dyad exercise).
Higher scores indicate more listening involvement.
|
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
|
DPR-Listening-Affect
기간: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated affective state during listening to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for.
Higher scores indicate a more positive affect.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
|
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
기간: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise).
Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013).
|
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
|
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
기간: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner.
Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
|
Dyad empathic and compassionate listening skills (DPR-listening-skills)
기간: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated skill of listening empathically and compassionately to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for.
Higher scores indicate a higher degree of empathic or compassionate listening respectively.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
환자 건강 설문지(PHQ-9; 사전 검사)
기간: 개입 전에 평가하여, 우울증 증상의 임상적 수준을 가진 개인을 연구에서 미리 선별하기 위해 단 한 번만 실시됩니다.
|
우울증을 평가하는 척도(Löwe et al., 2004; Martin et al., 2006).
높은 점수는 더 심한 우울증을 나타냅니다.
|
개입 전에 평가하여, 우울증 증상의 임상적 수준을 가진 개인을 연구에서 미리 선별하기 위해 단 한 번만 실시됩니다.
|
|
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
기간: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
|
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000).
Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; pre-screening)
기간: Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
|
A scale assessing generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007).
Higher scores indicate more anxiety.
|
Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
|
|
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
기간: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
|
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
|
|
General demographic questions
기간: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
|
Self-generated demographic items.
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Tania Singer, PhD, Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
- 수석 연구원: Philipp Beuchel, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
- 수석 연구원: Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
키워드
기타 연구 ID 번호
- Edu:Social School Study 2
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
대기자 명단 제어 그룹에 대한 임상 시험
-
Near East University, TurkeyAl-Ahli Hospital, Hebron모집하지 않고 적극적으로DVT 예방 | DVT - 심부 정맥 혈전증 | 심장 온펌프 수술 | DVT 예방 | On-pump Cardiac Surgery - Prevention - Intervention - Experimental Group - Control Group - Incidence - Complications | 간호 관리 프로토콜키프로스
-
University of OxfordWellcome Trust완전한
-
Minervax ApS완전한