- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07637409
Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for School Teachers' Well-being and Social Skills (EduSocSchool2)
Edu:Social School Study2: Promoting Well-being and Socio-emotional Skills for School Teachers With App-based Mindfulness and Dyadic Empathy-compassion Trainings.
The Edu:Social School Study 2 is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an 8-week socio-emotional, partner-based empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo) compared with a mindfulness-based training (MBT) and a waitlist control group (WLC) in school teachers.
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the adapted 8-week online EmCo Dyad training program across multiple domains of teacher functioning. Seven domains capture individual-level outcomes: (1) mental health, (2) resilience, (3) attention and cognitive processes, (4) social emotions, (5) stress coping and emotion regulation, (6) listening skills, and (7) voice-based emotional expression (DYVA). Two additional domains assess broader contextual outcomes: (8) classroom teaching and (9) organizational/school level outcomes, reflecting how individual-level changes may translate into perceived changes in the teaching and school context.
To this end, participants will be randomized into one of three groups: (1) an 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention (EmCo), (2) an 8-week mindfulness-based training program (MBT), or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC) that will receive the EmCo intervention after completion of the initial post-test. Both interventions are delivered online via a dedicated study application to ensure scalability and accessibility.
A second aim is to validate the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) as a measure of teachers' perceived social interactions and network structures. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial in teachers to examine whether changes in internal psychological processes are associated with perceived changes in the perception of the quality of interaction between school teachers and their students in the classroom as well as between school teachers and their colleagues in school.
A third aim is to introduce and validate objective measures of emotional processing based on AI-based voice analysis in educational field research. Specifically, the study will evaluate two tasks using different parameters of AI-based emotional voice analysis: (a) the Teacher Voice Assessment (TEAVA), in which teachers' voices are recorded during a teaching-related task, and (b) the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA), conducted during the daily partner-based Dyad practice. In both tasks, non-semantic vocal features (e.g., pitch, loudness, speaking rate, intonation) and vocal emotional expressions (e.g., arousal, valence, dominance, and basic emotional categories) will be analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. No speech content will be transcribed or analyzed.
A final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying intervention-related changes. Based on prior research, the EmCo Dyad training is expected to enhance care- and affiliation-related motivational systems associated with positive affect, social emotions and connectedness, and prosocial behavior, while reducing loneliness, social stress, and other forms of psychological vulnerability. In contrast, mindfulness-based training is expected to primarily strengthen attention- and thought-related processes, including present-moment awareness, calming the mind and executive attentional control. These mechanisms are expected to contribute to improvements in mental health and overall well-being across both intervention groups.
Studienübersicht
Status
Detaillierte Beschreibung
The teaching profession is widely recognized as highly demanding, and teachers report elevated rates of stress and burnout. If left unaddressed, burnout adversely affects teachers' health, job performance, teaching quality, and school turnover rates. Moreover, teacher burnout has important consequences for students. Teachers' emotional exhaustion has been shown to negatively affect students' academic achievement and self-concept in Germany. Given teachers' pivotal role in shaping children's socio-emotional development, addressing psychological vulnerability-including stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and exhaustion-is essential. Strengthening resilience enables teachers to maintain well-being and effective classroom functioning in the face of adversity by supporting adaptive stress management. In addition, strong interpersonal skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening play an important role in the teacher-student communication. Addressing psychological vulnerability and strengthening resilience and social skills, is essential not only for teacher well-being but also for the functioning of educational systems broadly.
In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices (Dyads), which specifically target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, social connectedness and different types of listening. However, dyadic interventions, that is daily mental practices done with a partner, have not yet been systematically investigated in educational settings. Existing evidence suggests that contemplative Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, enhancing social connection, and strengthening resilience. Moreover, dyadic practices appear to engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.
Empathy, (self-)compassion, and high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in school contexts. However, empathy may lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective due to its association with positive affect and prosocial motivation. To address this distinction, the Edu:Social School Study 2 implements an empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains participants in empathic listening and emotion regulation during the first four weeks, followed by (self-)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.
The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. These two large-scale mental training studies, have shown that different types of practices produce distinct effects on psychological and biological outcomes. The ReSource project, a 9-month longitudinal study using behavioral, hormonal, autonomic and neuroimaging (fMRI) measures, compared three training modules, including a mindfulness-based "Presence" module, a socio-affective "Affect" module (including the Affect Dyad) and a socio-cognitive "Perspective" module, and demonstrated that training content differentially affects mind, behavior and brain. Building on this work, the CovSocial project implemented a 10-week fully online design comparing a low-dose purely online socio-emotional Dyad training with a mindfulness-based active control training group. Results showed both shared and distinct effects: while both interventions improved mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and compassion, the Dyad training showed stronger effects on resilience, positivity bias, social connectedness, and reductions in loneliness and social stress.
Further, mediation analyses suggest that individual mindfulness practices and partner-based Dyadic practices influence well-being through partly distinct psychological mechanisms, whereas care-based motivational processes could account for Dyad-practice effects and thought-related process for mindfulness-practice effects.
Compared with these prior interventions, the present Edu:Social School intervention program introduces a novel empathy versus compassion listening component and reduces the duration from 10 to 8 weeks, improving feasibility within applied school settings. In an initial Edu:Social School pilot study, 120 teachers participated in a 10-week socio-emotional training program (EmCo). The pilot demonstrated high compliance and provided preliminary evidence for reductions in psychological vulnerability. However, the study lacked an active control group and a reliable waitlist control group, limiting interpretation. In addition, the 10-week duration was difficult to implement within the German school calendar.
The present study is a randomized controlled trial in a sample of school teachers (target N = 900). A multimethod assessment approach will be used, including validated trait and state self-report questionnaires, behavioral phone-based tasks administered via an app application, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered through smartphone notifications. These different assessments are capturing changes across the nine domains mentioned before.
After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) an empathy-compassion training group (EmCo), based on the Affect Dyad daily mental practice; (2) a mindfulness-based training group, based on attention-based mindfulness practices; or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC). All participants will first complete a pre-test assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, phone-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention groups will then be onboarded through two group-specific online sessions (Onboarding I and II) led by trained instructors, followed by participation in their respective 8-week programs delivered via a dedicated web and smartphone application. These programs include daily partner-based Dyad practices or mindfulness meditations, respectively, as well as weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. Throughout the intervention period, participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR) to assess changes in key psychological and social processes, which will be examined as potential mediators. At the end of the intervention, all participants will complete a post-test assessment phase comparable to the pre-test (T0) and mid-test (TM), with the addition of a final feedback questionnaire.
Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the waitlist control group will subsequently receive the same 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo) and complete an additional mid-tests (TM1) and post-test assessment (T2). After both training groups (EmCo and MBT) have completed their respective interventions, participants will be offered the opportunity to continue their practice via the study app. Participants in the EmCo group will be invited to continue the Dyad practice, whereas participants in the MBT group may choose to continue either the mindfulness-based practice or switch to the EmCo Dyad intervention. This phase of voluntary continued practice will take place in parallel with the 8-week EmCo Dyad training offered to the WLC following post-test.
The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at https://osf.io/x59pk
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: Lab Manager Social Neuroscience Lab
- Telefonnummer: +49 30 209346-180
- E-Mail: office@social.mpg.de
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 18- and 68-years old.
- Currently working as a school teacher in Germany or Austria; grades 1-12; primary, secondary, special needs, and vocational schools.
- Proficient in German.
- Informed consent.
- No symptoms of psychiatric disease within the past two years; healthy population, non-clinical population.
- Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).
- No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Insufficient German proficiency.
- Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).
- No informed consent.
- Not currently working as a school teacher.
- Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).
Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Martin et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2004; Cutoff ≥ 20; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15),
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)
- In addition, participants will complete the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003) which is not used as quantitative exclusion criteria in step 3, but provides additional information to support the phone call with one of the teachers, as part of the screening process.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Grundlegende Wissenschaft
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Doppelt
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
The socio-emotional intervention will consist of two 1.5h online onboarding I and II sessions and then 8 weeks of weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert teachers as well as daily dyad practice with a partner over 8 week.
|
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Mindfulness-based Training (MBT)
MBT includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily mindfulness practice over 8 weeks.
|
|
|
Sonstiges: Waitlist Control Group (WLC)
WLC receives EmCo training only after both intervention groups complete their programs.
|
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Depression-Angst-Stress-Skala (DASS-21)
Zeitfenster: Bei Studienbeginn (Vorher-Test) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Nachher-Test 1 & 2) bewertet
|
Eine Skala zur Messung von Depression, Angst und Stress (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021).
Höhere Werte deuten auf mehr Depression, Angst und Stress hin.
|
Bei Studienbeginn (Vorher-Test) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Nachher-Test 1 & 2) bewertet
|
|
UCLA-Einsamkeitsskala (UCLA)
Zeitfenster: Zu Beginn (Vor-Test) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Nach-Test 1 & 2) bewertet
|
Eine Skala zur Messung der Einsamkeitsschwere (Döring & Bortz, 1993; Russell et al., 1980).
Höhere Werte deuten auf mehr Einsamkeit hin.
|
Zu Beginn (Vor-Test) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Nach-Test 1 & 2) bewertet
|
|
Connor-Davidson-Resilienzskala (CD-RISC)
Zeitfenster: Zu Beginn (Vorabtest) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Nachtest 1 & 2) bewertet
|
Eine Skala zur Messung psychologischer Resilienz (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015).
Höhere Werte weisen auf eine größere Resilienz hin.
|
Zu Beginn (Vorabtest) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Nachtest 1 & 2) bewertet
|
|
Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scale for Self and Others (SOCS)
Zeitfenster: Beurteilt zu Studienbeginn (Vorabtest), nach 4 Wochen Empathie-Zuhören-Training (Zwischenintervention) und nach den 4 Wochen Mitgefühl-Zuhören-Training (Nachtest 1 & 2)
|
Eine Skala zur Messung von Selbstmitgefühl (SOCS-S) und Mitgefühl für andere (SOCS-O; Gu et al., 2020).
Höhere Werte deuten auf mehr Mitgefühl hin.
|
Beurteilt zu Studienbeginn (Vorabtest), nach 4 Wochen Empathie-Zuhören-Training (Zwischenintervention) und nach den 4 Wochen Mitgefühl-Zuhören-Training (Nachtest 1 & 2)
|
|
Bewältigungsstrategien
Zeitfenster: Bewertet mit einem EMA-Design mit fünf Push-Benachrichtigungsmessungen pro Tag, verteilt über fünf 3-Stunden-Intervalle, an vier Tagen innerhalb eines zweiwöchigen Zeitraums, vor dem Test (Baseline) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsperiode (Post-Intervention).
|
Maßgeschneiderte Items basierend auf dem Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) und dem Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) zur Messung von Coping-Strategien (Akzeptanz, positive Neubewertung, soziale Unterstützung, Grübeln, Selbstvorwürfe, Ablenkung).
Höhere Werte zeigen eine häufigere Nutzung der angegebenen Coping-Strategien an. |
Bewertet mit einem EMA-Design mit fünf Push-Benachrichtigungsmessungen pro Tag, verteilt über fünf 3-Stunden-Intervalle, an vier Tagen innerhalb eines zweiwöchigen Zeitraums, vor dem Test (Baseline) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsperiode (Post-Intervention).
|
|
Aktive Empathische Zuhörskala (AELS)
Zeitfenster: Beurteilt zu Studienbeginn (Vorabtest), nach 4 Wochen Empathie-Zuhörtraining (während der Intervention) und nach den 4 Wochen Mitgefühl-Zuhörtraining (Nachtest 1 & 2)
|
Eine Skala zur Messung des aktiven empathischen Zuhörens (Bodie, 2011).
Höhere Werte zeigen ein aktiveres empathisches Zuhören an.
|
Beurteilt zu Studienbeginn (Vorabtest), nach 4 Wochen Empathie-Zuhörtraining (während der Intervention) und nach den 4 Wochen Mitgefühl-Zuhörtraining (Nachtest 1 & 2)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Pitch
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Loudness
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Intonation
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software.
The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1).
Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000).
Higher scores indicate more burnout.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring the frequency and intensity of three distinct types of positive emotions: Activated PA (excitement, energy), Relaxed PA (calm, peacefulness), and Safe/Contentment PA (safety, security) (Gilbert et al., 2008).
Higher scores indicate a greater frequency and intensity of experiencing specific types of positive emotions.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Executive control (Flanker Task; FT)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
This task assesses executive control with three indices reaction times (RT), error rates, and the flanker effect (FE) (Trautwein et al., 2016; 2020).
Faster RT, lower error rates and FE indicate higher cognitive control.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Mind-Wandering
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
These two questions embedded in the flanker task assess mind-wandering during attentional performance (Smallwood, 2015).
Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
|
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Klimecki et al., 2014, 2013).
Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Stress intensity
Zeitfenster: Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
|
Custom item based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990) measuring stress intensity.
Higher scores indicate more intense stress.
|
Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
|
|
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring psychological working conditions (stressors and coping resources) impact employee health and well-being (Kristensen et al., 2005; Nübling, 2005)
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
The e-SNAP is a novel assessment paradigm based on the Affect Grid.
Teachers rate their interactions with both students and colleagues in terms of frequency and pleasantness in interactions.
In addition, teachers rate in both the student and colleague networks the relationships among each other, allowing to assess positive relations and network density.
Higher scores indicate more frequent and more positively experienced interactions, as well as more cohesive and positively connected social networks.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Positiver Affekt (Affect Grid) (Erklärungsmechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Wöchentlich während des 8-wöchigen Interventionszeitraums bewertet
|
Bewertung des emotionalen Zustands (Valenz) und der Erregung (Russell et al., 1989). Höhere Werte bei Valenz und Erregung zeigen einen positiveren Affekt und eine höhere Erregung an.
|
Wöchentlich während des 8-wöchigen Interventionszeitraums bewertet
|
|
Gratitude Questionnaire-6 (GQ-5-G) (erklärender Mechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Wöchentlich während des 8-wöchigen Verlaufs beurteilt
|
Eine Skala zur Messung von Dankbarkeit (Hudecek et al., 2021; McCullough et al., 2002).
Höhere Werte zeigen mehr Dankbarkeit an.
|
Wöchentlich während des 8-wöchigen Verlaufs beurteilt
|
|
Selbstfreundlichkeitsskala (SCS-SF) (erklärender Mechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Wöchentlich im Verlauf von 8 Wochen beurteilt
|
Ein selbstberichteter Fragebogen, der Selbstfreundlichkeit und mitfühlende Haltungen gegenüber sich selbst misst (Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011).
Höhere Werte deuten auf größere Selbstfreundlichkeit hin.
|
Wöchentlich im Verlauf von 8 Wochen beurteilt
|
|
Positive Interpretation Bias (ERT) (erklärender Mechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Bei Studienbeginn (Pre-Test) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Post-Test 1 & 2) beurteilt
|
Diese Aufgabe bewertet die Tendenz, die Gesichtsausdrücke von Personen positiver zu beurteilen, indem morphierte Sequenzen von Gesichtsausdrücken verwendet werden (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015).
Höhere Werte deuten auf eine stärkere positive Interpretationsverzerrung hin.
|
Bei Studienbeginn (Pre-Test) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Post-Test 1 & 2) beurteilt
|
|
Kurze Einsamkeitsskala (SLS) (Erklärungsmechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Wöchentlich während des Verlaufs von 8 Wochen bewertet
|
Eine Kurzskala zur Messung der Häufigkeit, Intensität und Dauer von Einsamkeit (Hughes et al., 2004; Qualter et al., 2021).
Höhere Werte weisen auf mehr Einsamkeit hin.
|
Wöchentlich während des Verlaufs von 8 Wochen bewertet
|
|
Depression (PHQ-2) (Erklärungsmechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Wöchentlich während des 8-wöchigen Verlaufs beurteilt
|
Ein kurzes Selbstbeurteilungs-Screeninginstrument zur Erfassung zentraler depressiver Symptome, einschließlich depressiver Stimmung und Anhedonie (Kroenke et al., 2003).
Höhere Werte deuten auf eine stärkere Ausprägung depressiver Symptome hin.
|
Wöchentlich während des 8-wöchigen Verlaufs beurteilt
|
|
Empathische Besorgnis & Belastung (IRI) (erklärender Mechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Wöchentlich während des Verlaufs von 8 Wochen bewertet
|
Eine Skala zur Messung verschiedener Facetten sozialer Emotionen, einschließlich persönlicher Belastung und empathischer Besorgnis (Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009).
Höhere Werte deuten auf eine höhere persönliche Belastung oder empathische Besorgnis hin.
|
Wöchentlich während des Verlaufs von 8 Wochen bewertet
|
|
In-Gruppe-Außengruppe-Verzerrung (ERT) (erklärender Mechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Zu Studienbeginn (Prä-Test) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Post-Test 1 & 2) erhoben
|
Diese Aufgabe bewertet die Tendenz, Personen aus der eigenen Gruppe bei der Gesichtsausdruckserkennung positiver zu beurteilen, indem morphierte Sequenzen von Gesichtsausdrücken verwendet werden (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015).
Höhere Werte deuten auf eine stärkere In-Group-Out-Group-Verzerrung hin.
|
Zu Studienbeginn (Prä-Test) und nach der 8-wöchigen Interventionsphase (Post-Test 1 & 2) erhoben
|
|
Bewältigungsstrategien (Erklärungsmechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Wöchentlich während des 8-wöchigen Verlaufs beurteilt
|
Individuelle Items basierend auf dem Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) und dem Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) zur Messung von Bewältigungsstrategien (Akzeptanz, positive Neubewertung, soziale Unterstützung, Grübeln, Selbstvorwürfe, Ablenkung).
Höhere Werte deuten auf eine häufigere Nutzung der jeweiligen Bewältigungsstrategien hin.
|
Wöchentlich während des 8-wöchigen Verlaufs beurteilt
|
|
DPR-Affect (Affekt-Gitter; Erklärungsmechanismus)
Zeitfenster: Über 8 Wochen während der Interventionsperiode bewertet, vor der täglichen Übung
|
Bewertung des emotionalen Zustands (Valenz) und der Erregung (Russell et al., 1989) unmittelbar vor Beginn der Dyade.
Höhere Werte bei Valenz und Erregung deuten auf eine positivere Stimmung und eine höhere Erregung hin. |
Über 8 Wochen während der Interventionsperiode bewertet, vor der täglichen Übung
|
|
DPR-Emotionen
Zeitfenster: Wöchentlich von Woche 1 bis Woche 8 als Teil der Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA) bewertet
|
Emotionsintensitäten (z.B. von Glück, Dankbarkeit, Traurigkeit, Wut), bewertet vom Sprecher und vom Zuhörer eines Dyads direkt nach dem Dyad.
|
Wöchentlich von Woche 1 bis Woche 8 als Teil der Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA) bewertet
|
|
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025).
Higher scores indicate greater emotion awareness and acceptance.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Perceived Stress (PSS-4) (explanatory mechanism)
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
A self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Weekly Mind-Wandering (explanatory mechanism)
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
These two questions assess mind-wandering in day-to-day life (Smallwood et al., 2013).
Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Weekly Thought Patterns (Cube of Thought) (explanatory mechanism)
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
These three questions assess polarities of thought orientation or quality (self-other, past-future, pleasant-unpleasant) (Petzold et al. 2023).
Higher scores indicate a higher level in each respective dimension.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
DPR-involvement (explanatory mechanism)
Zeitfenster: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
Assessment of listening involvement (1 custom item; only post-Dyad exercise).
Higher scores indicate more listening involvement.
|
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
|
DPR-Listening-Affect
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated affective state during listening to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for.
Higher scores indicate a more positive affect.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
|
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
Zeitfenster: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise).
Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013).
|
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
|
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner.
Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
|
Dyad empathic and compassionate listening skills (DPR-listening-skills)
Zeitfenster: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated skill of listening empathically and compassionately to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for.
Higher scores indicate a higher degree of empathic or compassionate listening respectively.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Andere Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Vorab-Screening)
Zeitfenster: Vor der Intervention bewertet, nur einmal, um Personen mit klinisch relevanten depressiven Symptomen vorab von der Studie auszuschließen
|
Eine Skala zur Beurteilung von Depressionen (Löwe et al., 2004; Martin et al., 2006).
Höhere Werte deuten auf stärkere Depressionen hin.
|
Vor der Intervention bewertet, nur einmal, um Personen mit klinisch relevanten depressiven Symptomen vorab von der Studie auszuschließen
|
|
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
Zeitfenster: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
|
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000).
Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; pre-screening)
Zeitfenster: Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
|
A scale assessing generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007).
Higher scores indicate more anxiety.
|
Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
|
|
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
Zeitfenster: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
|
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
|
|
General demographic questions
Zeitfenster: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
|
Self-generated demographic items.
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Tania Singer, PhD, Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
- Hauptermittler: Philipp Beuchel, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
- Hauptermittler: Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- Edu:Social School Study 2
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Kontrollgruppe Warteliste
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)AbgeschlossenGruppenfitness (traditionell) | Group Fitness (Gameplay-basiert)Vereinigte Staaten
-
University of BeykentAnmeldung auf EinladungMobile Anwendungen | Selbstwirksamkeit | Betreuung | Pflege | Akademische Leistungen | Peer Group Guidance | College -AnpassungTruthahn
-
Karabuk UniversityAbgeschlossenGesundheitserziehung | Passivrauchen | Tabakrauchverschmutzung | Peer Group GuidanceTürkei (türkiye)
-
University of LjubljanaRekrutierungDer Fokus liegt auf der Entwicklung eines Closed-Loop-Control-Systems für die Anästhesie in der vitroretinalen Chirurgie, der Chirurgie aufgrund ausgedehnter Prozesse im Kopf und der LangzeitsedierungSlowenien
-
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteAbgeschlossenSchwere pädiatrische Fettleibigkeit (BMI > 97° pc – gemäß den BMI-Diagrammen der Centers for Disease Control and Prevention –) | Veränderte Leberfunktionstests | Glykämische IntoleranzItalien
-
Jin FengUnbekannt1 、 Genügend Fälle | 2、Elekta Precise 1343 Digital Control Electron Linear Accelerator | Kann Proben von Nasopharynxkarzinomen in der Materia durchführen, | Bildabteilung des Nasen-Rachen-Ministeriums für dynamische MRT-Tests,China