Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for School Teachers' Well-being and Social Skills (EduSocSchool2)

4 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab

Edu:Social School Study2: Promoting Well-being and Socio-emotional Skills for School Teachers With App-based Mindfulness and Dyadic Empathy-compassion Trainings.

The Edu:Social School Study 2 is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an 8-week socio-emotional, partner-based empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo) compared with a mindfulness-based training (MBT) and a waitlist control group (WLC) in school teachers.

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the adapted 8-week online EmCo Dyad training program across multiple domains of teacher functioning. Seven domains capture individual-level outcomes: (1) mental health, (2) resilience, (3) attention and cognitive processes, (4) social emotions, (5) stress coping and emotion regulation, (6) listening skills, and (7) voice-based emotional expression (DYVA). Two additional domains assess broader contextual outcomes: (8) classroom teaching and (9) organizational/school level outcomes, reflecting how individual-level changes may translate into perceived changes in the teaching and school context.

To this end, participants will be randomized into one of three groups: (1) an 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention (EmCo), (2) an 8-week mindfulness-based training program (MBT), or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC) that will receive the EmCo intervention after completion of the initial post-test. Both interventions are delivered online via a dedicated study application to ensure scalability and accessibility.

A second aim is to validate the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) as a measure of teachers' perceived social interactions and network structures. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial in teachers to examine whether changes in internal psychological processes are associated with perceived changes in the perception of the quality of interaction between school teachers and their students in the classroom as well as between school teachers and their colleagues in school.

A third aim is to introduce and validate objective measures of emotional processing based on AI-based voice analysis in educational field research. Specifically, the study will evaluate two tasks using different parameters of AI-based emotional voice analysis: (a) the Teacher Voice Assessment (TEAVA), in which teachers' voices are recorded during a teaching-related task, and (b) the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA), conducted during the daily partner-based Dyad practice. In both tasks, non-semantic vocal features (e.g., pitch, loudness, speaking rate, intonation) and vocal emotional expressions (e.g., arousal, valence, dominance, and basic emotional categories) will be analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. No speech content will be transcribed or analyzed.

A final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying intervention-related changes. Based on prior research, the EmCo Dyad training is expected to enhance care- and affiliation-related motivational systems associated with positive affect, social emotions and connectedness, and prosocial behavior, while reducing loneliness, social stress, and other forms of psychological vulnerability. In contrast, mindfulness-based training is expected to primarily strengthen attention- and thought-related processes, including present-moment awareness, calming the mind and executive attentional control. These mechanisms are expected to contribute to improvements in mental health and overall well-being across both intervention groups.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

The teaching profession is widely recognized as highly demanding, and teachers report elevated rates of stress and burnout. If left unaddressed, burnout adversely affects teachers' health, job performance, teaching quality, and school turnover rates. Moreover, teacher burnout has important consequences for students. Teachers' emotional exhaustion has been shown to negatively affect students' academic achievement and self-concept in Germany. Given teachers' pivotal role in shaping children's socio-emotional development, addressing psychological vulnerability-including stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and exhaustion-is essential. Strengthening resilience enables teachers to maintain well-being and effective classroom functioning in the face of adversity by supporting adaptive stress management. In addition, strong interpersonal skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening play an important role in the teacher-student communication. Addressing psychological vulnerability and strengthening resilience and social skills, is essential not only for teacher well-being but also for the functioning of educational systems broadly.

In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices (Dyads), which specifically target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, social connectedness and different types of listening. However, dyadic interventions, that is daily mental practices done with a partner, have not yet been systematically investigated in educational settings. Existing evidence suggests that contemplative Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, enhancing social connection, and strengthening resilience. Moreover, dyadic practices appear to engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.

Empathy, (self-)compassion, and high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in school contexts. However, empathy may lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective due to its association with positive affect and prosocial motivation. To address this distinction, the Edu:Social School Study 2 implements an empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains participants in empathic listening and emotion regulation during the first four weeks, followed by (self-)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.

The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. These two large-scale mental training studies, have shown that different types of practices produce distinct effects on psychological and biological outcomes. The ReSource project, a 9-month longitudinal study using behavioral, hormonal, autonomic and neuroimaging (fMRI) measures, compared three training modules, including a mindfulness-based "Presence" module, a socio-affective "Affect" module (including the Affect Dyad) and a socio-cognitive "Perspective" module, and demonstrated that training content differentially affects mind, behavior and brain. Building on this work, the CovSocial project implemented a 10-week fully online design comparing a low-dose purely online socio-emotional Dyad training with a mindfulness-based active control training group. Results showed both shared and distinct effects: while both interventions improved mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and compassion, the Dyad training showed stronger effects on resilience, positivity bias, social connectedness, and reductions in loneliness and social stress.

Further, mediation analyses suggest that individual mindfulness practices and partner-based Dyadic practices influence well-being through partly distinct psychological mechanisms, whereas care-based motivational processes could account for Dyad-practice effects and thought-related process for mindfulness-practice effects.

Compared with these prior interventions, the present Edu:Social School intervention program introduces a novel empathy versus compassion listening component and reduces the duration from 10 to 8 weeks, improving feasibility within applied school settings. In an initial Edu:Social School pilot study, 120 teachers participated in a 10-week socio-emotional training program (EmCo). The pilot demonstrated high compliance and provided preliminary evidence for reductions in psychological vulnerability. However, the study lacked an active control group and a reliable waitlist control group, limiting interpretation. In addition, the 10-week duration was difficult to implement within the German school calendar.

The present study is a randomized controlled trial in a sample of school teachers (target N = 900). A multimethod assessment approach will be used, including validated trait and state self-report questionnaires, behavioral phone-based tasks administered via an app application, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered through smartphone notifications. These different assessments are capturing changes across the nine domains mentioned before.

After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) an empathy-compassion training group (EmCo), based on the Affect Dyad daily mental practice; (2) a mindfulness-based training group, based on attention-based mindfulness practices; or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC). All participants will first complete a pre-test assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, phone-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention groups will then be onboarded through two group-specific online sessions (Onboarding I and II) led by trained instructors, followed by participation in their respective 8-week programs delivered via a dedicated web and smartphone application. These programs include daily partner-based Dyad practices or mindfulness meditations, respectively, as well as weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. Throughout the intervention period, participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR) to assess changes in key psychological and social processes, which will be examined as potential mediators. At the end of the intervention, all participants will complete a post-test assessment phase comparable to the pre-test (T0) and mid-test (TM), with the addition of a final feedback questionnaire.

Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the waitlist control group will subsequently receive the same 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo) and complete an additional mid-tests (TM1) and post-test assessment (T2). After both training groups (EmCo and MBT) have completed their respective interventions, participants will be offered the opportunity to continue their practice via the study app. Participants in the EmCo group will be invited to continue the Dyad practice, whereas participants in the MBT group may choose to continue either the mindfulness-based practice or switch to the EmCo Dyad intervention. This phase of voluntary continued practice will take place in parallel with the 8-week EmCo Dyad training offered to the WLC following post-test.

The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at https://osf.io/x59pk

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

900

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

  • Nome: Lab Manager Social Neuroscience Lab
  • Numero di telefono: +49 30 209346-180
  • Email: office@social.mpg.de

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18- and 68-years old.
  • Currently working as a school teacher in Germany or Austria; grades 1-12; primary, secondary, special needs, and vocational schools.
  • Proficient in German.
  • Informed consent.
  • No symptoms of psychiatric disease within the past two years; healthy population, non-clinical population.
  • Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient German proficiency.
  • Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No informed consent.
  • Not currently working as a school teacher.
  • Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).
  • Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:

    • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Martin et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2004; Cutoff ≥ 20; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
    • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15),
    • Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)

      • In addition, participants will complete the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003) which is not used as quantitative exclusion criteria in step 3, but provides additional information to support the phone call with one of the teachers, as part of the screening process.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Scienza basilare
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
The socio-emotional intervention will consist of two 1.5h online onboarding I and II sessions and then 8 weeks of weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert teachers as well as daily dyad practice with a partner over 8 week.
  1. Participants engage in a structured 13-minute partner-based contemplative exercise. Each dyad reflects on two experiences from the previous 24 hours: one involving a difficult emotion and one involving gratitude. Partners take turns speaking while the other listens non-judgmentally. During weeks 1-4, the practice emphasizes empathic listening; during weeks 5-8, compassionate listening. Participants are instructed to attend to bodily sensations associated with the emotions described. The practice aims to improve coping with difficult emotions, empathic and compassionate listening, (self)acceptance, compassion, gratitude, resilience.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert Dyad teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the Dyad practice and educate teachers about body language, coping better with difficult emotions/stress, the benefits of empathy versus compassion and the act of listening from a mindset of empathy versus compassion.
Comparatore attivo: Mindfulness-based Training (MBT)
MBT includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily mindfulness practice over 8 weeks.
  1. In this intervention, participants will practice 13-minute basic attention-based mindfulness meditation such as the Breathing Meditation (BM). BM is a 13-minute individual exercise that requires participants to focus their attention on the sensations of breathing. Participants have to sustain their attention to breath for long stretches of time, and have to return their attention to their breath when their mind wanders. The key focus is on training attention and interoceptive body awareness. Other practices participants will be taught is mindfulness on sounds (here the object of attention is not the breath but sounds in the environment) as well as open presence meditation.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert mindfulness teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the mindfulness practice and educate teachers about bodily sensations, attention, rumination.
Altro: Waitlist Control Group (WLC)
WLC receives EmCo training only after both intervention groups complete their programs.
  1. Initially, participants in the WLC group will not receive the intervention. They will complete pre- and post-test procedures consisting primarily of self-report questionnaires, and behavioral tasks, as well as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) conducted on four days within two weeks at pre-test and post-test 1 & 2.
  2. The WLC will be offered the EmCo training only after both intervention groups have completed their trainings

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 & 2)
Una scala che misura depressione, ansia e stress (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021). Punteggi più alti indicano maggiore depressione, ansia e stress.
Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 & 2)
Scala di Solitudine UCLA (UCLA)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 & 2)
Una scala che misura la gravità della solitudine (Döring & Bortz, 1993; Russell et al., 1980).
Punteggi più alti indicano maggiore solitudine.
Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 & 2)
Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 e 2)
Una scala per misurare la resilienza psicologica (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015). Punteggi più alti indicano maggiore resilienza.
Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 e 2)
Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scale for Self and Others (SOCS)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato al basale (pre-test), dopo 4 settimane di training di ascolto empatico (mid-intervento) e dopo le 4 settimane di training di ascolto compassionevole (post-test 1 & 2)
Una scala che misura l'auto-compassione (SOCS-S) e la compassione per gli altri (SOCS-O; Gu et al., 2020). Punteggi più alti indicano maggiore compassione.
Valutato al basale (pre-test), dopo 4 settimane di training di ascolto empatico (mid-intervento) e dopo le 4 settimane di training di ascolto compassionevole (post-test 1 & 2)
Strategie di coping
Lasso di tempo: Valutato utilizzando un design EMA con cinque misurazioni push-notification al giorno, distribuite in cinque intervalli di 3 ore, in quattro giorni in un periodo di due settimane, al pre-test (Baseline) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-intervento).
Elementi personalizzati basati sul Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) e sul Questionario di Regolazione Cognitiva delle Emozioni (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) che misurano le Strategie di Coping (Accettazione, Rinterpretazione Positiva, Supporto Sociale, Rimuginazione, Auto-colpevolizzazione, Distrazione). Punteggi più alti indicano un maggiore utilizzo delle specifiche strategie di coping.
Valutato utilizzando un design EMA con cinque misurazioni push-notification al giorno, distribuite in cinque intervalli di 3 ore, in quattro giorni in un periodo di due settimane, al pre-test (Baseline) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-intervento).
Scala di Ascolto Empatico Attivo (AELS)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato al basale (pre-test), dopo 4 settimane di training di ascolto empatico (mid-intervento) e dopo le 4 settimane di training di ascolto compassionevole (post-test 1 e 2)
Una scala che misura l'ascolto empatico attivo (Bodie, 2011). Punteggi più alti indicano un ascolto empatico attivo maggiore.
Valutato al basale (pre-test), dopo 4 settimane di training di ascolto empatico (mid-intervento) e dopo le 4 settimane di training di ascolto compassionevole (post-test 1 e 2)
Prosodic Feature Pitch
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Loudness
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Intonation
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1). Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000). Higher scores indicate more burnout.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring the frequency and intensity of three distinct types of positive emotions: Activated PA (excitement, energy), Relaxed PA (calm, peacefulness), and Safe/Contentment PA (safety, security) (Gilbert et al., 2008). Higher scores indicate a greater frequency and intensity of experiencing specific types of positive emotions.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Executive control (Flanker Task; FT)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses executive control with three indices reaction times (RT), error rates, and the flanker effect (FE) (Trautwein et al., 2016; 2020). Faster RT, lower error rates and FE indicate higher cognitive control.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Mind-Wandering
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
These two questions embedded in the flanker task assess mind-wandering during attentional performance (Smallwood, 2015). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Klimecki et al., 2014, 2013). Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
Stress intensity
Lasso di tempo: Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Custom item based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990) measuring stress intensity. Higher scores indicate more intense stress.
Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring psychological working conditions (stressors and coping resources) impact employee health and well-being (Kristensen et al., 2005; Nübling, 2005)
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
The e-SNAP is a novel assessment paradigm based on the Affect Grid. Teachers rate their interactions with both students and colleagues in terms of frequency and pleasantness in interactions. In addition, teachers rate in both the student and colleague networks the relationships among each other, allowing to assess positive relations and network density. Higher scores indicate more frequent and more positively experienced interactions, as well as more cohesive and positively connected social networks.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Affetto Positivo (Griglia degli Affetti) (meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato settimanalmente nel corso di 8 settimane di intervento
Valutazione dello stato emotivo (valenza) e dell’eccitazione (Russell et al., 1989). Punteggi più alti per valenza ed eccitazione indicano un affetto più positivo e un’eccitazione più elevata.
Valutato settimanalmente nel corso di 8 settimane di intervento
Questionario sulla Gratitudine-6 (GQ-5-G) (meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato settimanalmente durante il corso di 8 settimane
Una scala per misurare la gratitudine (Hudecek et al., 2021; McCullough et al., 2002). Punteggi più alti indicano maggiore gratitudine.
Valutato settimanalmente durante il corso di 8 settimane
Scala di Gentilezza verso Se Stessi (SCS-SF) (meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato settimanalmente durante il corso di 8 settimane
Un questionario di autovalutazione che misura l'autocompassione e gli atteggiamenti compassionevoli verso se stessi (Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011). Punteggi più alti indicano una maggiore autocompassione.
Valutato settimanalmente durante il corso di 8 settimane
Positive Interpretation Bias (ERT) (meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 e 2)
Questo compito valuta la tendenza a giudicare le espressioni facciali delle persone in modo più positivo utilizzando sequenze di espressioni facciali morfate (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015). Punteggi più alti indicano un bias di interpretazione positivo più forte.
Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 e 2)
Short Loneliness Scale (SLS) (meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato settimanalmente durante il corso di 8 settimane
Una breve scala che misura frequenza, intensità e durata della solitudine (Hughes et al., 2004; Qualter et al., 2021). Punteggi più alti indicano maggiore solitudine.
Valutato settimanalmente durante il corso di 8 settimane
Depressione (PHQ-2) (meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato settimanalmente durante il corso di 8 settimane
Un breve strumento di screening autovalutativo che valuta i sintomi depressivi principali, inclusi l'umore depresso e l'anedonia (Kroenke et al., 2003). Punteggi più alti indicano una maggiore gravità dei sintomi depressivi.
Valutato settimanalmente durante il corso di 8 settimane
Preoccupazione Empatica e Angoscia (IRI) (meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato settimanalmente nel corso di 8 settimane
Una scala che misura diversi aspetti delle emozioni sociali, compreso il disagio personale e la preoccupazione empatica (Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009). Punteggi più alti indicano un maggiore disagio personale o preoccupazione empatica.
Valutato settimanalmente nel corso di 8 settimane
Bias Gruppo Interno-Gruppo Esterno (ERT) (meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 & 2)
Questo compito valuta la tendenza a giudicare le persone del proprio gruppo come più positive nel riconoscimento delle emozioni facciali utilizzando sequenze morfate di espressioni facciali (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015). Punteggi più alti indicano un più forte bias in-group-out-group.
Valutato al basale (pre-test) e dopo il periodo di intervento di 8 settimane (post-test 1 & 2)
Strategie di coping (meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato settimanalmente nel corso di 8 settimane
Elementi personalizzati basati sul Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) e sul Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) che misurano le strategie di coping (Accettazione, Reinterpretazione positiva, Supporto sociale, Rimuginio, Autoaccusa, Distrazione). Punteggi più alti indicano un maggiore utilizzo delle strategie di coping specificate.
Valutato settimanalmente nel corso di 8 settimane
DPR-Affect (Affect Grid; meccanismo esplicativo)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato per 8 settimane durante il periodo di intervento, prima dell'esercizio quotidiano
Valutazione dello stato emotivo (valenza) e dell’eccitazione (Russell et al., 1989) subito prima di iniziare la Diade. Punteggi più alti per valenza ed eccitazione indicano un affetto più positivo e una maggiore eccitazione.
Valutato per 8 settimane durante il periodo di intervento, prima dell'esercizio quotidiano
DPR-Emotions
Lasso di tempo: Valutato settimanalmente dalla settimana 1 alla settimana 8, come parte della Valutazione Vocale della Diade (DYVA)
Intensità emotive (ad esempio, felicità, gratitudine, tristezza, rabbia) valutate dal parlante e dall'ascoltatore di una diade direttamente dopo la diade.
Valutato settimanalmente dalla settimana 1 alla settimana 8, come parte della Valutazione Vocale della Diade (DYVA)
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025). Higher scores indicate greater emotion awareness and acceptance.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Perceived Stress (PSS-4) (explanatory mechanism)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016). Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Mind-Wandering (explanatory mechanism)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These two questions assess mind-wandering in day-to-day life (Smallwood et al., 2013). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Thought Patterns (Cube of Thought) (explanatory mechanism)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These three questions assess polarities of thought orientation or quality (self-other, past-future, pleasant-unpleasant) (Petzold et al. 2023). Higher scores indicate a higher level in each respective dimension.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
DPR-involvement (explanatory mechanism)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of listening involvement (1 custom item; only post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more listening involvement.
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
DPR-Listening-Affect
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated affective state during listening to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a more positive affect.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013).
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad empathic and compassionate listening skills (DPR-listening-skills)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated skill of listening empathically and compassionately to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of empathic or compassionate listening respectively.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Questionario sulla Salute del Paziente (PHQ-9; pre-screening)
Lasso di tempo: Valutato prima dell'intervento, una sola volta, per escludere dallo studio individui con livelli clinici di sintomi depressivi
Una scala per valutare la depressione (Löwe et al., 2004; Martin et al., 2006). Punteggi più alti indicano maggiore depressione.
Valutato prima dell'intervento, una sola volta, per escludere dallo studio individui con livelli clinici di sintomi depressivi
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000). Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; pre-screening)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
A scale assessing generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007). Higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
General demographic questions
Lasso di tempo: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
Self-generated demographic items.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Tania Singer, PhD, Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • Investigatore principale: Philipp Beuchel, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • Investigatore principale: Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 giugno 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

20 dicembre 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

3 aprile 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

26 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

4 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

9 giugno 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

9 giugno 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

4 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 aprile 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Gruppo di controllo della lista d'attesa

Sottoscrivi