- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07637409
Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for School Teachers' Well-being and Social Skills (EduSocSchool2)
Edu:Social School Study2: Promoting Well-being and Socio-emotional Skills for School Teachers With App-based Mindfulness and Dyadic Empathy-compassion Trainings.
The Edu:Social School Study 2 is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an 8-week socio-emotional, partner-based empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo) compared with a mindfulness-based training (MBT) and a waitlist control group (WLC) in school teachers.
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the adapted 8-week online EmCo Dyad training program across multiple domains of teacher functioning. Seven domains capture individual-level outcomes: (1) mental health, (2) resilience, (3) attention and cognitive processes, (4) social emotions, (5) stress coping and emotion regulation, (6) listening skills, and (7) voice-based emotional expression (DYVA). Two additional domains assess broader contextual outcomes: (8) classroom teaching and (9) organizational/school level outcomes, reflecting how individual-level changes may translate into perceived changes in the teaching and school context.
To this end, participants will be randomized into one of three groups: (1) an 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention (EmCo), (2) an 8-week mindfulness-based training program (MBT), or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC) that will receive the EmCo intervention after completion of the initial post-test. Both interventions are delivered online via a dedicated study application to ensure scalability and accessibility.
A second aim is to validate the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) as a measure of teachers' perceived social interactions and network structures. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial in teachers to examine whether changes in internal psychological processes are associated with perceived changes in the perception of the quality of interaction between school teachers and their students in the classroom as well as between school teachers and their colleagues in school.
A third aim is to introduce and validate objective measures of emotional processing based on AI-based voice analysis in educational field research. Specifically, the study will evaluate two tasks using different parameters of AI-based emotional voice analysis: (a) the Teacher Voice Assessment (TEAVA), in which teachers' voices are recorded during a teaching-related task, and (b) the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA), conducted during the daily partner-based Dyad practice. In both tasks, non-semantic vocal features (e.g., pitch, loudness, speaking rate, intonation) and vocal emotional expressions (e.g., arousal, valence, dominance, and basic emotional categories) will be analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. No speech content will be transcribed or analyzed.
A final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying intervention-related changes. Based on prior research, the EmCo Dyad training is expected to enhance care- and affiliation-related motivational systems associated with positive affect, social emotions and connectedness, and prosocial behavior, while reducing loneliness, social stress, and other forms of psychological vulnerability. In contrast, mindfulness-based training is expected to primarily strengthen attention- and thought-related processes, including present-moment awareness, calming the mind and executive attentional control. These mechanisms are expected to contribute to improvements in mental health and overall well-being across both intervention groups.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Descrição detalhada
The teaching profession is widely recognized as highly demanding, and teachers report elevated rates of stress and burnout. If left unaddressed, burnout adversely affects teachers' health, job performance, teaching quality, and school turnover rates. Moreover, teacher burnout has important consequences for students. Teachers' emotional exhaustion has been shown to negatively affect students' academic achievement and self-concept in Germany. Given teachers' pivotal role in shaping children's socio-emotional development, addressing psychological vulnerability-including stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and exhaustion-is essential. Strengthening resilience enables teachers to maintain well-being and effective classroom functioning in the face of adversity by supporting adaptive stress management. In addition, strong interpersonal skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening play an important role in the teacher-student communication. Addressing psychological vulnerability and strengthening resilience and social skills, is essential not only for teacher well-being but also for the functioning of educational systems broadly.
In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices (Dyads), which specifically target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, social connectedness and different types of listening. However, dyadic interventions, that is daily mental practices done with a partner, have not yet been systematically investigated in educational settings. Existing evidence suggests that contemplative Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, enhancing social connection, and strengthening resilience. Moreover, dyadic practices appear to engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.
Empathy, (self-)compassion, and high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in school contexts. However, empathy may lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective due to its association with positive affect and prosocial motivation. To address this distinction, the Edu:Social School Study 2 implements an empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains participants in empathic listening and emotion regulation during the first four weeks, followed by (self-)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.
The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. These two large-scale mental training studies, have shown that different types of practices produce distinct effects on psychological and biological outcomes. The ReSource project, a 9-month longitudinal study using behavioral, hormonal, autonomic and neuroimaging (fMRI) measures, compared three training modules, including a mindfulness-based "Presence" module, a socio-affective "Affect" module (including the Affect Dyad) and a socio-cognitive "Perspective" module, and demonstrated that training content differentially affects mind, behavior and brain. Building on this work, the CovSocial project implemented a 10-week fully online design comparing a low-dose purely online socio-emotional Dyad training with a mindfulness-based active control training group. Results showed both shared and distinct effects: while both interventions improved mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and compassion, the Dyad training showed stronger effects on resilience, positivity bias, social connectedness, and reductions in loneliness and social stress.
Further, mediation analyses suggest that individual mindfulness practices and partner-based Dyadic practices influence well-being through partly distinct psychological mechanisms, whereas care-based motivational processes could account for Dyad-practice effects and thought-related process for mindfulness-practice effects.
Compared with these prior interventions, the present Edu:Social School intervention program introduces a novel empathy versus compassion listening component and reduces the duration from 10 to 8 weeks, improving feasibility within applied school settings. In an initial Edu:Social School pilot study, 120 teachers participated in a 10-week socio-emotional training program (EmCo). The pilot demonstrated high compliance and provided preliminary evidence for reductions in psychological vulnerability. However, the study lacked an active control group and a reliable waitlist control group, limiting interpretation. In addition, the 10-week duration was difficult to implement within the German school calendar.
The present study is a randomized controlled trial in a sample of school teachers (target N = 900). A multimethod assessment approach will be used, including validated trait and state self-report questionnaires, behavioral phone-based tasks administered via an app application, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered through smartphone notifications. These different assessments are capturing changes across the nine domains mentioned before.
After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) an empathy-compassion training group (EmCo), based on the Affect Dyad daily mental practice; (2) a mindfulness-based training group, based on attention-based mindfulness practices; or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC). All participants will first complete a pre-test assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, phone-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention groups will then be onboarded through two group-specific online sessions (Onboarding I and II) led by trained instructors, followed by participation in their respective 8-week programs delivered via a dedicated web and smartphone application. These programs include daily partner-based Dyad practices or mindfulness meditations, respectively, as well as weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. Throughout the intervention period, participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR) to assess changes in key psychological and social processes, which will be examined as potential mediators. At the end of the intervention, all participants will complete a post-test assessment phase comparable to the pre-test (T0) and mid-test (TM), with the addition of a final feedback questionnaire.
Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the waitlist control group will subsequently receive the same 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo) and complete an additional mid-tests (TM1) and post-test assessment (T2). After both training groups (EmCo and MBT) have completed their respective interventions, participants will be offered the opportunity to continue their practice via the study app. Participants in the EmCo group will be invited to continue the Dyad practice, whereas participants in the MBT group may choose to continue either the mindfulness-based practice or switch to the EmCo Dyad intervention. This phase of voluntary continued practice will take place in parallel with the 8-week EmCo Dyad training offered to the WLC following post-test.
The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at https://osf.io/x59pk
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Lab Manager Social Neuroscience Lab
- Número de telefone: +49 30 209346-180
- E-mail: office@social.mpg.de
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 18- and 68-years old.
- Currently working as a school teacher in Germany or Austria; grades 1-12; primary, secondary, special needs, and vocational schools.
- Proficient in German.
- Informed consent.
- No symptoms of psychiatric disease within the past two years; healthy population, non-clinical population.
- Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).
- No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Insufficient German proficiency.
- Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).
- No informed consent.
- Not currently working as a school teacher.
- Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).
Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Martin et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2004; Cutoff ≥ 20; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15),
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)
- In addition, participants will complete the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003) which is not used as quantitative exclusion criteria in step 3, but provides additional information to support the phone call with one of the teachers, as part of the screening process.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Ciência básica
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Dobro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
The socio-emotional intervention will consist of two 1.5h online onboarding I and II sessions and then 8 weeks of weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert teachers as well as daily dyad practice with a partner over 8 week.
|
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Mindfulness-based Training (MBT)
MBT includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily mindfulness practice over 8 weeks.
|
|
|
Outro: Waitlist Control Group (WLC)
WLC receives EmCo training only after both intervention groups complete their programs.
|
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Escala de Depressão, Ansiedade e Stress (DASS-21)
Prazo: Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 e 2)
|
Uma escala que mede depressão, ansiedade e stress (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021).
Pontuações mais altas indicam mais depressão, ansiedade e stress.
|
Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 e 2)
|
|
Escala de Solidão da UCLA (UCLA)
Prazo: Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 e 2)
|
Uma escala que mede a gravidade da solidão (Döring & Bortz, 1993; Russell et al., 1980).
Pontuações mais elevadas indicam maior solidão.
|
Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 e 2)
|
|
Escala de Resiliência Connor Davidson (CD-RISC)
Prazo: Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 & 2)
|
Uma escala que mede a resiliência psicológica (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015).
Pontuações mais elevadas indicam maior resiliência. |
Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 & 2)
|
|
Escala de Compaixão de Sussex-Oxford para Si Próprio e para os Outros (SOCS)
Prazo: Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste), após 4 semanas de treino de escuta empática (a meio da intervenção) e após as 4 semanas de treino de escuta compassiva (pós-teste 1 & 2)
|
Uma escala que mede a autocompaixão (SOCS-S) e a compaixão pelos outros (SOCS-O; Gu et al., 2020).
Pontuações mais altas indicam mais compaixão.
|
Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste), após 4 semanas de treino de escuta empática (a meio da intervenção) e após as 4 semanas de treino de escuta compassiva (pós-teste 1 & 2)
|
|
Estratégias de coping
Prazo: Avaliado utilizando um design EMA com cinco medições por notificação push por dia, distribuídas ao longo de cinco intervalos de 3 horas, em quatro dias num período de duas semanas, no pré-teste (Linha de Base) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-intervenção).
|
Itens personalizados baseados no Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) e no Questionário de Regulação Emocional Cognitiva (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) que medem Estratégias de Coping (Aceitação, Reinterpretação Positiva, Suporte Social, Ruminação, Auto-Culpa, Distração).
Pontuações mais altas indicam um uso mais frequente das estratégias de coping especificadas.
|
Avaliado utilizando um design EMA com cinco medições por notificação push por dia, distribuídas ao longo de cinco intervalos de 3 horas, em quatro dias num período de duas semanas, no pré-teste (Linha de Base) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-intervenção).
|
|
Escala de Escuta Empática Ativa (AELS)
Prazo: Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste), após 4 semanas de treino de escuta empática (meio da intervenção) e após as 4 semanas de treino de escuta compassiva (pós-teste 1 & 2)
|
Uma escala que mede a escuta empática ativa (Bodie, 2011).
Pontuações mais altas indicam uma escuta empática ativa mais elevada.
|
Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste), após 4 semanas de treino de escuta empática (meio da intervenção) e após as 4 semanas de treino de escuta compassiva (pós-teste 1 & 2)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Pitch
Prazo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Loudness
Prazo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
Prazo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Intonation
Prazo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Prazo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software.
The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1).
Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Prazo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES)
Prazo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000).
Higher scores indicate more burnout.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS)
Prazo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring the frequency and intensity of three distinct types of positive emotions: Activated PA (excitement, energy), Relaxed PA (calm, peacefulness), and Safe/Contentment PA (safety, security) (Gilbert et al., 2008).
Higher scores indicate a greater frequency and intensity of experiencing specific types of positive emotions.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Executive control (Flanker Task; FT)
Prazo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
This task assesses executive control with three indices reaction times (RT), error rates, and the flanker effect (FE) (Trautwein et al., 2016; 2020).
Faster RT, lower error rates and FE indicate higher cognitive control.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Mind-Wandering
Prazo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
These two questions embedded in the flanker task assess mind-wandering during attentional performance (Smallwood, 2015).
Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT)
Prazo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
|
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Klimecki et al., 2014, 2013).
Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Stress intensity
Prazo: Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
|
Custom item based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990) measuring stress intensity.
Higher scores indicate more intense stress.
|
Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
|
|
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)
Prazo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring psychological working conditions (stressors and coping resources) impact employee health and well-being (Kristensen et al., 2005; Nübling, 2005)
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP)
Prazo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
The e-SNAP is a novel assessment paradigm based on the Affect Grid.
Teachers rate their interactions with both students and colleagues in terms of frequency and pleasantness in interactions.
In addition, teachers rate in both the student and colleague networks the relationships among each other, allowing to assess positive relations and network density.
Higher scores indicate more frequent and more positively experienced interactions, as well as more cohesive and positively connected social networks.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Afeto Positivo (Grelha de Afetos) (mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado semanalmente durante o curso de 8 semanas de intervenção
|
Avaliação do estado emocional (valência) e excitação (Russell et al., 1989).
Pontuações mais elevadas em valência e excitação indicam afeto mais positivo e maior excitação.
|
Avaliado semanalmente durante o curso de 8 semanas de intervenção
|
|
Questionário de Gratidão-6 (GQ-5-G) (mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado semanalmente ao longo de 8 semanas
|
Uma escala que mede a gratidão (Hudecek et al., 2021; McCullough et al., 2002).
Pontuações mais altas indicam mais gratidão.
|
Avaliado semanalmente ao longo de 8 semanas
|
|
Escala de Autocompaixão (SCS-SF) (mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado semanalmente durante o período de 8 semanas
|
Um questionário de autorrelato que mede a autocompaixão e atitudes compassivas em relação a si mesmo (Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011).
Pontuações mais elevadas indicam maior autocompaixão. |
Avaliado semanalmente durante o período de 8 semanas
|
|
Viés de Interpretação Positiva (ERT) (mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 e 2)
|
Esta tarefa avalia a tendência para julgar as expressões faciais das pessoas de forma mais positiva utilizando sequências transformadas de expressões faciais (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015).
Pontuações mais elevadas indicam um viés de interpretação positiva mais forte.
|
Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 e 2)
|
|
Escala Breve de Solidão (SLS) (mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado semanalmente ao longo de 8 semanas
|
Uma escala curta que mede a frequência, intensidade e duração da solidão (Hughes et al., 2004; Qualter et al., 2021).
Pontuações mais altas indicam maior solidão.
|
Avaliado semanalmente ao longo de 8 semanas
|
|
Depressão (PHQ-2) (mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado semanalmente durante o período de 8 semanas
|
Uma breve medida de rastreio auto-reportada que avalia os principais sintomas depressivos, incluindo humor depressivo e anedonia (Kroenke et al., 2003).
Pontuações mais elevadas indicam maior gravidade dos sintomas depressivos. |
Avaliado semanalmente durante o período de 8 semanas
|
|
Preocupação Empática & Angústia (IRI) (mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado semanalmente durante o curso de 8 semanas
|
Uma escala que mede diferentes facetas das emoções sociais, incluindo angústia pessoal e preocupação empática (Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009).
Pontuações mais elevadas indicam maior angústia pessoal ou preocupação empática.
|
Avaliado semanalmente durante o curso de 8 semanas
|
|
Viés de Grupo Interno-Grupo Externo (ERT) (mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 e 2)
|
Esta tarefa avalia a tendência para julgar as pessoas do próprio grupo de forma mais positiva no reconhecimento de emoções faciais, utilizando sequências transformadas de expressões faciais (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015).
Pontuações mais elevadas indicam um viés mais forte entre o grupo interno e o grupo externo.
|
Avaliado na linha de base (pré-teste) e após o período de intervenção de 8 semanas (pós-teste 1 e 2)
|
|
Estratégias de coping (mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado semanalmente ao longo de 8 semanas
|
Itens personalizados baseados no Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) e no Questionário de Regulação Cognitiva das Emoções (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) que medem Estratégias de Coping (Aceitação, Reinterpretação Positiva, Suporte Social, Ruminação, Autoculpa, Distração).
Pontuações mais elevadas indicam uma maior utilização das estratégias de coping especificadas.
|
Avaliado semanalmente ao longo de 8 semanas
|
|
DPR-Affect (Grade de Afeto; mecanismo explicativo)
Prazo: Avaliado durante 8 semanas no período de intervenção, antes do exercício diário
|
Avaliação do estado emocional (valência) e excitação (Russell et al., 1989) imediatamente antes de iniciar o Dyad.
Pontuações mais elevadas em valência e excitação indicam afeto mais positivo e maior excitação.
|
Avaliado durante 8 semanas no período de intervenção, antes do exercício diário
|
|
DPR-Emoções
Prazo: Avaliado semanalmente da semana 1 à semana 8, como parte da Avaliação Vocal do Díade (DYVA)
|
Intensidades emocionais (por exemplo, felicidade, gratidão, tristeza, raiva) avaliadas pelo falante e pelo ouvinte de uma Díade diretamente após a Díade.
|
Avaliado semanalmente da semana 1 à semana 8, como parte da Avaliação Vocal do Díade (DYVA)
|
|
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
Prazo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025).
Higher scores indicate greater emotion awareness and acceptance.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Perceived Stress (PSS-4) (explanatory mechanism)
Prazo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
A self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Weekly Mind-Wandering (explanatory mechanism)
Prazo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
These two questions assess mind-wandering in day-to-day life (Smallwood et al., 2013).
Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Weekly Thought Patterns (Cube of Thought) (explanatory mechanism)
Prazo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
These three questions assess polarities of thought orientation or quality (self-other, past-future, pleasant-unpleasant) (Petzold et al. 2023).
Higher scores indicate a higher level in each respective dimension.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
DPR-involvement (explanatory mechanism)
Prazo: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
Assessment of listening involvement (1 custom item; only post-Dyad exercise).
Higher scores indicate more listening involvement.
|
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
|
DPR-Listening-Affect
Prazo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated affective state during listening to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for.
Higher scores indicate a more positive affect.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
|
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
Prazo: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise).
Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013).
|
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
|
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
Prazo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner.
Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
|
Dyad empathic and compassionate listening skills (DPR-listening-skills)
Prazo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated skill of listening empathically and compassionately to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for.
Higher scores indicate a higher degree of empathic or compassionate listening respectively.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Outras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Questionário de Saúde do Paciente (PHQ-9; pré-triagem)
Prazo: Avaliado antes da intervenção, apenas uma vez, para pré-selecionar e excluir do estudo indivíduos que apresentem níveis clínicos de sintomas depressivos
|
Uma escala que avalia a depressão (Löwe et al., 2004; Martin et al., 2006).
Pontuações mais altas indicam maior depressão.
|
Avaliado antes da intervenção, apenas uma vez, para pré-selecionar e excluir do estudo indivíduos que apresentem níveis clínicos de sintomas depressivos
|
|
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
Prazo: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
|
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000).
Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; pre-screening)
Prazo: Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
|
A scale assessing generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007).
Higher scores indicate more anxiety.
|
Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
|
|
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
Prazo: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
|
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
|
|
General demographic questions
Prazo: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
|
Self-generated demographic items.
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Tania Singer, PhD, Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
- Investigador principal: Philipp Beuchel, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
- Investigador principal: Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
- Empatia
- Resiliência
- Compaixão
- Professores de escola
- Treinamento mental
- Formação em Díades
- Saúde-Mental
- Formação Online & Baseada em Aplicativo
- Avaliação de Voz Baseada em IA
- Compassionate Listening
- Empathic Listening
- Mindfulness-based Training
- Social Emotions
- e-SNAP
- Perceive Psychosocial Work Environment
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- Edu:Social School Study 2
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .
Ensaios clínicos em Grupo de controle de lista de espera
-
University of Buenos AiresAinda não está recrutandoAvaliar a utilidade clínica e o nível de aceitabilidade do formato UP Online Group na Argentina, bem como a satisfação dos participantesArgentina
-
Vanderbilt UniversityUniversity of California, IrvineConcluídoCondição 1 - Condição Educacional (Grupo de Livros Educacionais) | Condição 2 - Condição Não Educacional (Grupo de Livros Não Educacionais) | Condição 3 - Condição de Controle (No-book Group)Estados Unidos
-
Jin FengDesconhecido1、Casos suficientes | 2、Elekta Precise 1343 Digital Control Acelerador Eletrônico Linear | Pode realizar amostras de carcinoma nasofaríngeo na matéria, | Departamento de Imagem do Ministério Nariz Faringe Teste dinâmico de ressonância magnética,China
-
Andrew Hantel, MDAinda não está recrutandoMieloma múltiplo | Câncer de Mama Triplo Negativo | Grupo Sanguíneo Duffy, Mutação do Gene do Recetor de Quimiocina | Duffy Blood Group, Chemokine Receptor Gene C.-67T>CEstados Unidos