此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for School Teachers' Well-being and Social Skills (EduSocSchool2)

2026年9月11日 更新者:Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab

Edu:Social School Study2: Promoting Well-being and Socio-emotional Skills for School Teachers With App-based Mindfulness and Dyadic Empathy-compassion Trainings.

The Edu:Social School Study 2 is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an 8-week socio-emotional, partner-based empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo) compared with a mindfulness-based training (MBT) and a waitlist control group (WLC) in school teachers.

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the adapted 8-week online EmCo Dyad training program across multiple domains of teacher functioning. Seven domains capture individual-level outcomes: (1) mental health, (2) resilience, (3) attention and cognitive processes, (4) social emotions, (5) stress coping and emotion regulation, (6) listening skills, and (7) voice-based emotional expression (DYVA). Two additional domains assess broader contextual outcomes: (8) classroom teaching and (9) organizational/school level outcomes, reflecting how individual-level changes may translate into perceived changes in the teaching and school context.

To this end, participants will be randomized into one of three groups: (1) an 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention (EmCo), (2) an 8-week mindfulness-based training program (MBT), or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC) that will receive the EmCo intervention after completion of the initial post-test. Both interventions are delivered online via a dedicated study application to ensure scalability and accessibility.

A second aim is to validate the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) as a measure of teachers' perceived social interactions and network structures. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial in teachers to examine whether changes in internal psychological processes are associated with perceived changes in the perception of the quality of interaction between school teachers and their students in the classroom as well as between school teachers and their colleagues in school.

A third aim is to introduce and validate objective measures of emotional processing based on AI-based voice analysis in educational field research. Specifically, the study will evaluate two tasks using different parameters of AI-based emotional voice analysis: (a) the Teacher Voice Assessment (TEAVA), in which teachers' voices are recorded during a teaching-related task, and (b) the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA), conducted during the daily partner-based Dyad practice. In both tasks, non-semantic vocal features (e.g., pitch, loudness, speaking rate, intonation) and vocal emotional expressions (e.g., arousal, valence, dominance, and basic emotional categories) will be analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. No speech content will be transcribed or analyzed.

A final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying intervention-related changes. Based on prior research, the EmCo Dyad training is expected to enhance care- and affiliation-related motivational systems associated with positive affect, social emotions and connectedness, and prosocial behavior, while reducing loneliness, social stress, and other forms of psychological vulnerability. In contrast, mindfulness-based training is expected to primarily strengthen attention- and thought-related processes, including present-moment awareness, calming the mind and executive attentional control. These mechanisms are expected to contribute to improvements in mental health and overall well-being across both intervention groups.

研究概览

详细说明

The teaching profession is widely recognized as highly demanding, and teachers report elevated rates of stress and burnout. If left unaddressed, burnout adversely affects teachers' health, job performance, teaching quality, and school turnover rates. Moreover, teacher burnout has important consequences for students. Teachers' emotional exhaustion has been shown to negatively affect students' academic achievement and self-concept in Germany. Given teachers' pivotal role in shaping children's socio-emotional development, addressing psychological vulnerability-including stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and exhaustion-is essential. Strengthening resilience enables teachers to maintain well-being and effective classroom functioning in the face of adversity by supporting adaptive stress management. In addition, strong interpersonal skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening play an important role in the teacher-student communication. Addressing psychological vulnerability and strengthening resilience and social skills, is essential not only for teacher well-being but also for the functioning of educational systems broadly.

In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices (Dyads), which specifically target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, social connectedness and different types of listening. However, dyadic interventions, that is daily mental practices done with a partner, have not yet been systematically investigated in educational settings. Existing evidence suggests that contemplative Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, enhancing social connection, and strengthening resilience. Moreover, dyadic practices appear to engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.

Empathy, (self-)compassion, and high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in school contexts. However, empathy may lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective due to its association with positive affect and prosocial motivation. To address this distinction, the Edu:Social School Study 2 implements an empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains participants in empathic listening and emotion regulation during the first four weeks, followed by (self-)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.

The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. These two large-scale mental training studies, have shown that different types of practices produce distinct effects on psychological and biological outcomes. The ReSource project, a 9-month longitudinal study using behavioral, hormonal, autonomic and neuroimaging (fMRI) measures, compared three training modules, including a mindfulness-based "Presence" module, a socio-affective "Affect" module (including the Affect Dyad) and a socio-cognitive "Perspective" module, and demonstrated that training content differentially affects mind, behavior and brain. Building on this work, the CovSocial project implemented a 10-week fully online design comparing a low-dose purely online socio-emotional Dyad training with a mindfulness-based active control training group. Results showed both shared and distinct effects: while both interventions improved mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and compassion, the Dyad training showed stronger effects on resilience, positivity bias, social connectedness, and reductions in loneliness and social stress.

Further, mediation analyses suggest that individual mindfulness practices and partner-based Dyadic practices influence well-being through partly distinct psychological mechanisms, whereas care-based motivational processes could account for Dyad-practice effects and thought-related process for mindfulness-practice effects.

Compared with these prior interventions, the present Edu:Social School intervention program introduces a novel empathy versus compassion listening component and reduces the duration from 10 to 8 weeks, improving feasibility within applied school settings. In an initial Edu:Social School pilot study, 120 teachers participated in a 10-week socio-emotional training program (EmCo). The pilot demonstrated high compliance and provided preliminary evidence for reductions in psychological vulnerability. However, the study lacked an active control group and a reliable waitlist control group, limiting interpretation. In addition, the 10-week duration was difficult to implement within the German school calendar.

The present study is a randomized controlled trial in a sample of school teachers (target N = 900). A multimethod assessment approach will be used, including validated trait and state self-report questionnaires, behavioral phone-based tasks administered via an app application, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered through smartphone notifications. These different assessments are capturing changes across the nine domains mentioned before.

After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) an empathy-compassion training group (EmCo), based on the Affect Dyad daily mental practice; (2) a mindfulness-based training group, based on attention-based mindfulness practices; or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC). All participants will first complete a pre-test assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, phone-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention groups will then be onboarded through two group-specific online sessions (Onboarding I and II) led by trained instructors, followed by participation in their respective 8-week programs delivered via a dedicated web and smartphone application. These programs include daily partner-based Dyad practices or mindfulness meditations, respectively, as well as weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. Throughout the intervention period, participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR) to assess changes in key psychological and social processes, which will be examined as potential mediators. At the end of the intervention, all participants will complete a post-test assessment phase comparable to the pre-test (T0) and mid-test (TM), with the addition of a final feedback questionnaire.

Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the waitlist control group will subsequently receive the same 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo) and complete an additional mid-tests (TM1) and post-test assessment (T2). After both training groups (EmCo and MBT) have completed their respective interventions, participants will be offered the opportunity to continue their practice via the study app. Participants in the EmCo group will be invited to continue the Dyad practice, whereas participants in the MBT group may choose to continue either the mindfulness-based practice or switch to the EmCo Dyad intervention. This phase of voluntary continued practice will take place in parallel with the 8-week EmCo Dyad training offered to the WLC following post-test.

The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at https://osf.io/x59pk

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

900

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • State of Berlin
      • Berlin、State of Berlin、德国、10557
        • Social Neuroscience lab manages the Edu:Social study-based app

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18- and 68-years old.
  • Currently working as a school teacher in Germany or Austria; grades 1-12; primary, secondary, special needs, and vocational schools.
  • Proficient in German.
  • Informed consent.
  • No symptoms of psychiatric disease within the past two years; healthy population, non-clinical population.
  • Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient German proficiency.
  • Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No informed consent.
  • Not currently working as a school teacher.
  • Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).
  • Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:

    • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Martin et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2004; Cutoff ≥ 20; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
    • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15),
    • Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)

      • In addition, participants will complete the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003) which is not used as quantitative exclusion criteria in step 3, but provides additional information to support the phone call with one of the teachers, as part of the screening process.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:基础科学
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
The socio-emotional intervention will consist of two 1.5h online onboarding I and II sessions and then 8 weeks of weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert teachers as well as daily dyad practice with a partner over 8 week.
  1. Participants engage in a structured 13-minute partner-based contemplative exercise. Each dyad reflects on two experiences from the previous 24 hours: one involving a difficult emotion and one involving gratitude. Partners take turns speaking while the other listens non-judgmentally. During weeks 1-4, the practice emphasizes empathic listening; during weeks 5-8, compassionate listening. Participants are instructed to attend to bodily sensations associated with the emotions described. The practice aims to improve coping with difficult emotions, empathic and compassionate listening, (self)acceptance, compassion, gratitude, resilience.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert Dyad teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the Dyad practice and educate teachers about body language, coping better with difficult emotions/stress, the benefits of empathy versus compassion and the act of listening from a mindset of empathy versus compassion.
有源比较器:Mindfulness-based Training (MBT)
MBT includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily mindfulness practice over 8 weeks.
  1. In this intervention, participants will practice 13-minute basic attention-based mindfulness meditation such as the Breathing Meditation (BM). BM is a 13-minute individual exercise that requires participants to focus their attention on the sensations of breathing. Participants have to sustain their attention to breath for long stretches of time, and have to return their attention to their breath when their mind wanders. The key focus is on training attention and interoceptive body awareness. Other practices participants will be taught is mindfulness on sounds (here the object of attention is not the breath but sounds in the environment) as well as open presence meditation.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert mindfulness teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the mindfulness practice and educate teachers about bodily sensations, attention, rumination.
其他:Waitlist Control Group (WLC)
WLC receives EmCo training only after both intervention groups complete their programs.
  1. Initially, participants in the WLC group will not receive the intervention. They will complete pre- and post-test procedures consisting primarily of self-report questionnaires, and behavioral tasks, as well as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) conducted on four days within two weeks at pre-test and post-test 1 & 2.
  2. The WLC will be offered the EmCo training only after both intervention groups have completed their trainings

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
抑郁焦虑压力量表 (DASS-21)
大体时间:在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
一种测量抑郁、焦虑和压力的量表(Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021)。 分数越高表示抑郁、焦虑和压力程度越严重。
在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
UCLA孤独量表(UCLA)
大体时间:在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
一项测量孤独感严重程度的量表(Döring & Bortz,1993;Russell等人,1980)。 分数越高表明孤独感越强。
在基线(测试前)和8周干预期后(测试后1和2)进行评估
康纳-戴维森心理韧性量表 (CD-RISC)
大体时间:在基线(预测试)和8周干预期后(后测试1和2)进行评估
一个测量心理韧性的量表(Connor & Davidson,2003;Sarubin 等人,2015)。 分数越高表示韧性越强。
在基线(预测试)和8周干预期后(后测试1和2)进行评估
苏塞克斯-牛津自我与他人共情量表(SOCS)
大体时间:在基线(前测)、共情倾听训练4周后(中期干预)以及同情倾听训练4周后(后测1和2)进行评估
测量自我慈悲(SOCS-S)和对他人的慈悲(SOCS-O;Gu等人,2020年)的量表。 分数越高表示慈悲程度越高。
在基线(前测)、共情倾听训练4周后(中期干预)以及同情倾听训练4周后(后测1和2)进行评估
应对策略
大体时间:采用EMA设计进行评估,在两周内的四天中,每天通过五次推送通知进行测量,分布在五个3小时间隔内,分别在测试前(基线期)和8周干预期后(干预后)进行。
基于简要应对方式问卷(Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005)和认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011)设计的定制项目,用于测量应对策略(接纳、积极重评、社会支持、沉思、自责、分心)。 得分越高表示对特定应对策略的使用频率越高。
采用EMA设计进行评估,在两周内的四天中,每天通过五次推送通知进行测量,分布在五个3小时间隔内,分别在测试前(基线期)和8周干预期后(干预后)进行。
积极共情倾听量表 (AELS)
大体时间:在基线(测试前)、共情倾听训练4周后(干预中期)以及慈悲倾听训练4周后(测试后1和2)进行评估
一项测量主动共情倾听的量表(Bodie,2011)。 分数越高表示主动共情倾听能力越强。
在基线(测试前)、共情倾听训练4周后(干预中期)以及慈悲倾听训练4周后(测试后1和2)进行评估
Prosodic Feature Pitch
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Loudness
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Intonation
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1). Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES)
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000). Higher scores indicate more burnout.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS)
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring the frequency and intensity of three distinct types of positive emotions: Activated PA (excitement, energy), Relaxed PA (calm, peacefulness), and Safe/Contentment PA (safety, security) (Gilbert et al., 2008). Higher scores indicate a greater frequency and intensity of experiencing specific types of positive emotions.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Executive control (Flanker Task; FT)
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses executive control with three indices reaction times (RT), error rates, and the flanker effect (FE) (Trautwein et al., 2016; 2020). Faster RT, lower error rates and FE indicate higher cognitive control.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Mind-Wandering
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
These two questions embedded in the flanker task assess mind-wandering during attentional performance (Smallwood, 2015). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT)
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Klimecki et al., 2014, 2013). Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
Stress intensity
大体时间:Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Custom item based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990) measuring stress intensity. Higher scores indicate more intense stress.
Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring psychological working conditions (stressors and coping resources) impact employee health and well-being (Kristensen et al., 2005; Nübling, 2005)
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP)
大体时间:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
The e-SNAP is a novel assessment paradigm based on the Affect Grid. Teachers rate their interactions with both students and colleagues in terms of frequency and pleasantness in interactions. In addition, teachers rate in both the student and colleague networks the relationships among each other, allowing to assess positive relations and network density. Higher scores indicate more frequent and more positively experienced interactions, as well as more cohesive and positively connected social networks.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
积极情感(情感网格)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周干预期间每周评估
情绪状态(效价)与唤醒度评估(Russell等人,1989年)。 效价与唤醒度得分越高,表明积极情感越强、唤醒度越高。
在8周干预期间每周评估
感恩问卷-6(GQ-5-G)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估
一种衡量感恩程度的量表(Hudecek等人,2021年;McCullough等人,2002年)。 分数越高表示感恩程度越高。
在8周疗程期间每周评估
自我仁慈量表(SCS-SF)(解释机制)
大体时间:在为期8周的疗程期间每周评估
一份衡量自我仁慈和对自己富有同情心态度的自陈式问卷(Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011)。 分数越高表明自我仁慈程度越高。
在为期8周的疗程期间每周评估
积极解释偏倚(ERT)(解释机制)
大体时间:在基线(预测试)和8周干预期后(后测试1和2)进行评估
该任务通过使用面部表情的渐变序列(DeBruine & Jones,2017;Griffiths 等人,2015),评估对人物面部表情做出更积极判断的倾向。 分数越高表示更强的积极解释偏差。
在基线(预测试)和8周干预期后(后测试1和2)进行评估
简短孤独感量表(SLS)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
一项测量孤独感频率、强度和持续时间的简短量表(Hughes等人,2004年;Qualter等人,2021年)。 分数越高表明孤独感越强。
在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
抑郁症(PHQ-2)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
一项简短的自我报告筛查工具,用于评估核心抑郁症状,包括抑郁情绪和快感缺乏(Kroenke等人,2003年)。 分数越高表明抑郁症状越严重。
在8周疗程期间每周评估一次
共情关切与困扰(IRI)(解释机制)
大体时间:在8周疗程期间每周评估
一种测量社会情绪不同维度的量表,包括个人困扰和共情关怀(Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009)。 分数越高表示个人困扰或共情关怀程度越高。
在8周疗程期间每周评估
群内-群外偏见(ERT)(解释机制)
大体时间:在基线(前测)和8周干预期后(后测1和2)进行评估
该任务通过使用面部表情的渐变序列(DeBruine & Jones,2017;Griffiths等,2015),评估个体在面部情绪识别中倾向于认为来自自己群体的人更为积极的倾向。 分数越高表示内群体-外群体偏见越强。
在基线(前测)和8周干预期后(后测1和2)进行评估
应对策略(解释机制)
大体时间:在为期8周的疗程中每周评估一次
根据简要应对方式问卷(Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005)和认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011)制定的自定义项目,用于测量应对策略(接纳、积极重评、社会支持、沉思、自责、分心)。 分数越高表明使用特定应对策略的频率越高。
在为期8周的疗程中每周评估一次
DPR-Affect(情感网格;解释机制)
大体时间:在干预期间评估8周,在每日锻炼之前
在开始双人任务前评估情绪状态(效价)和唤醒度(Russell等人,1989年)。 效价和唤醒度得分越高,表示积极情绪越强且唤醒度越高。
在干预期间评估8周,在每日锻炼之前
DPR-情绪
大体时间:作为Dyad语音评估(DYVA)的一部分,从第1周到第8周每周评估一次
由对话双方(说话者和倾听者)在对话结束后直接评定的情绪强度(例如,快乐、感激、悲伤、愤怒)。
作为Dyad语音评估(DYVA)的一部分,从第1周到第8周每周评估一次
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
大体时间:Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025). Higher scores indicate greater emotion awareness and acceptance.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Perceived Stress (PSS-4) (explanatory mechanism)
大体时间:Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016). Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Mind-Wandering (explanatory mechanism)
大体时间:Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These two questions assess mind-wandering in day-to-day life (Smallwood et al., 2013). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Thought Patterns (Cube of Thought) (explanatory mechanism)
大体时间:Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These three questions assess polarities of thought orientation or quality (self-other, past-future, pleasant-unpleasant) (Petzold et al. 2023). Higher scores indicate a higher level in each respective dimension.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
DPR-involvement (explanatory mechanism)
大体时间:Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of listening involvement (1 custom item; only post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more listening involvement.
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
DPR-Listening-Affect
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated affective state during listening to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a more positive affect.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
大体时间:Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013).
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad empathic and compassionate listening skills (DPR-listening-skills)
大体时间:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated skill of listening empathically and compassionately to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of empathic or compassionate listening respectively.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
患者健康问卷(PHQ-9;预筛选)
大体时间:在干预前评估,仅一次,以预先筛查出具有临床抑郁症状水平的个体
评估抑郁程度的量表(Löwe等人,2004年;Martin等人,2006年)。 分数越高表示抑郁程度越严重。
在干预前评估,仅一次,以预先筛查出具有临床抑郁症状水平的个体
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
大体时间:Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000). Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; pre-screening)
大体时间:Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
A scale assessing generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007). Higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
大体时间:Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
General demographic questions
大体时间:Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
Self-generated demographic items.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Tania Singer, PhD、Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • 首席研究员:Philipp Beuchel, Ph.D.、Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • 首席研究员:Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Ph.D.、Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年8月28日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年12月20日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年4月3日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月26日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月4日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月9日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月15日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月11日

最后验证

2026年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅