- ICH GCP
- Rejestr badań klinicznych w USA
- Badanie kliniczne NCT07637409
Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for School Teachers' Well-being and Social Skills (EduSocSchool2)
Edu:Social School Study2: Promoting Well-being and Socio-emotional Skills for School Teachers With App-based Mindfulness and Dyadic Empathy-compassion Trainings.
The Edu:Social School Study 2 is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an 8-week socio-emotional, partner-based empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo) compared with a mindfulness-based training (MBT) and a waitlist control group (WLC) in school teachers.
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the adapted 8-week online EmCo Dyad training program across multiple domains of teacher functioning. Seven domains capture individual-level outcomes: (1) mental health, (2) resilience, (3) attention and cognitive processes, (4) social emotions, (5) stress coping and emotion regulation, (6) listening skills, and (7) voice-based emotional expression (DYVA). Two additional domains assess broader contextual outcomes: (8) classroom teaching and (9) organizational/school level outcomes, reflecting how individual-level changes may translate into perceived changes in the teaching and school context.
To this end, participants will be randomized into one of three groups: (1) an 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention (EmCo), (2) an 8-week mindfulness-based training program (MBT), or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC) that will receive the EmCo intervention after completion of the initial post-test. Both interventions are delivered online via a dedicated study application to ensure scalability and accessibility.
A second aim is to validate the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) as a measure of teachers' perceived social interactions and network structures. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial in teachers to examine whether changes in internal psychological processes are associated with perceived changes in the perception of the quality of interaction between school teachers and their students in the classroom as well as between school teachers and their colleagues in school.
A third aim is to introduce and validate objective measures of emotional processing based on AI-based voice analysis in educational field research. Specifically, the study will evaluate two tasks using different parameters of AI-based emotional voice analysis: (a) the Teacher Voice Assessment (TEAVA), in which teachers' voices are recorded during a teaching-related task, and (b) the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA), conducted during the daily partner-based Dyad practice. In both tasks, non-semantic vocal features (e.g., pitch, loudness, speaking rate, intonation) and vocal emotional expressions (e.g., arousal, valence, dominance, and basic emotional categories) will be analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. No speech content will be transcribed or analyzed.
A final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying intervention-related changes. Based on prior research, the EmCo Dyad training is expected to enhance care- and affiliation-related motivational systems associated with positive affect, social emotions and connectedness, and prosocial behavior, while reducing loneliness, social stress, and other forms of psychological vulnerability. In contrast, mindfulness-based training is expected to primarily strengthen attention- and thought-related processes, including present-moment awareness, calming the mind and executive attentional control. These mechanisms are expected to contribute to improvements in mental health and overall well-being across both intervention groups.
Przegląd badań
Status
Szczegółowy opis
The teaching profession is widely recognized as highly demanding, and teachers report elevated rates of stress and burnout. If left unaddressed, burnout adversely affects teachers' health, job performance, teaching quality, and school turnover rates. Moreover, teacher burnout has important consequences for students. Teachers' emotional exhaustion has been shown to negatively affect students' academic achievement and self-concept in Germany. Given teachers' pivotal role in shaping children's socio-emotional development, addressing psychological vulnerability-including stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and exhaustion-is essential. Strengthening resilience enables teachers to maintain well-being and effective classroom functioning in the face of adversity by supporting adaptive stress management. In addition, strong interpersonal skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening play an important role in the teacher-student communication. Addressing psychological vulnerability and strengthening resilience and social skills, is essential not only for teacher well-being but also for the functioning of educational systems broadly.
In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices (Dyads), which specifically target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, social connectedness and different types of listening. However, dyadic interventions, that is daily mental practices done with a partner, have not yet been systematically investigated in educational settings. Existing evidence suggests that contemplative Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, enhancing social connection, and strengthening resilience. Moreover, dyadic practices appear to engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.
Empathy, (self-)compassion, and high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in school contexts. However, empathy may lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective due to its association with positive affect and prosocial motivation. To address this distinction, the Edu:Social School Study 2 implements an empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains participants in empathic listening and emotion regulation during the first four weeks, followed by (self-)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.
The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. These two large-scale mental training studies, have shown that different types of practices produce distinct effects on psychological and biological outcomes. The ReSource project, a 9-month longitudinal study using behavioral, hormonal, autonomic and neuroimaging (fMRI) measures, compared three training modules, including a mindfulness-based "Presence" module, a socio-affective "Affect" module (including the Affect Dyad) and a socio-cognitive "Perspective" module, and demonstrated that training content differentially affects mind, behavior and brain. Building on this work, the CovSocial project implemented a 10-week fully online design comparing a low-dose purely online socio-emotional Dyad training with a mindfulness-based active control training group. Results showed both shared and distinct effects: while both interventions improved mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and compassion, the Dyad training showed stronger effects on resilience, positivity bias, social connectedness, and reductions in loneliness and social stress.
Further, mediation analyses suggest that individual mindfulness practices and partner-based Dyadic practices influence well-being through partly distinct psychological mechanisms, whereas care-based motivational processes could account for Dyad-practice effects and thought-related process for mindfulness-practice effects.
Compared with these prior interventions, the present Edu:Social School intervention program introduces a novel empathy versus compassion listening component and reduces the duration from 10 to 8 weeks, improving feasibility within applied school settings. In an initial Edu:Social School pilot study, 120 teachers participated in a 10-week socio-emotional training program (EmCo). The pilot demonstrated high compliance and provided preliminary evidence for reductions in psychological vulnerability. However, the study lacked an active control group and a reliable waitlist control group, limiting interpretation. In addition, the 10-week duration was difficult to implement within the German school calendar.
The present study is a randomized controlled trial in a sample of school teachers (target N = 900). A multimethod assessment approach will be used, including validated trait and state self-report questionnaires, behavioral phone-based tasks administered via an app application, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered through smartphone notifications. These different assessments are capturing changes across the nine domains mentioned before.
After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) an empathy-compassion training group (EmCo), based on the Affect Dyad daily mental practice; (2) a mindfulness-based training group, based on attention-based mindfulness practices; or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC). All participants will first complete a pre-test assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, phone-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention groups will then be onboarded through two group-specific online sessions (Onboarding I and II) led by trained instructors, followed by participation in their respective 8-week programs delivered via a dedicated web and smartphone application. These programs include daily partner-based Dyad practices or mindfulness meditations, respectively, as well as weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. Throughout the intervention period, participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR) to assess changes in key psychological and social processes, which will be examined as potential mediators. At the end of the intervention, all participants will complete a post-test assessment phase comparable to the pre-test (T0) and mid-test (TM), with the addition of a final feedback questionnaire.
Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the waitlist control group will subsequently receive the same 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo) and complete an additional mid-tests (TM1) and post-test assessment (T2). After both training groups (EmCo and MBT) have completed their respective interventions, participants will be offered the opportunity to continue their practice via the study app. Participants in the EmCo group will be invited to continue the Dyad practice, whereas participants in the MBT group may choose to continue either the mindfulness-based practice or switch to the EmCo Dyad intervention. This phase of voluntary continued practice will take place in parallel with the 8-week EmCo Dyad training offered to the WLC following post-test.
The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at https://osf.io/x59pk
Typ studiów
Zapisy (Szacowany)
Faza
- Nie dotyczy
Kontakty i lokalizacje
Kontakt w sprawie studiów
- Nazwa: Lab Manager Social Neuroscience Lab
- Numer telefonu: +49 30 209346-180
- E-mail: office@social.mpg.de
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
- Dorosły
- Starszy dorosły
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 18- and 68-years old.
- Currently working as a school teacher in Germany or Austria; grades 1-12; primary, secondary, special needs, and vocational schools.
- Proficient in German.
- Informed consent.
- No symptoms of psychiatric disease within the past two years; healthy population, non-clinical population.
- Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).
- No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Insufficient German proficiency.
- Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).
- No informed consent.
- Not currently working as a school teacher.
- Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).
Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Martin et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2004; Cutoff ≥ 20; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15),
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)
- In addition, participants will complete the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003) which is not used as quantitative exclusion criteria in step 3, but provides additional information to support the phone call with one of the teachers, as part of the screening process.
Plan studiów
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
- Główny cel: Podstawowa nauka
- Przydział: Randomizowane
- Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
- Maskowanie: Podwójnie
Broń i interwencje
Grupa uczestników / Arm |
Interwencja / Leczenie |
|---|---|
|
Eksperymentalny: Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
The socio-emotional intervention will consist of two 1.5h online onboarding I and II sessions and then 8 weeks of weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert teachers as well as daily dyad practice with a partner over 8 week.
|
|
|
Aktywny komparator: Mindfulness-based Training (MBT)
MBT includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily mindfulness practice over 8 weeks.
|
|
|
Inny: Waitlist Control Group (WLC)
WLC receives EmCo training only after both intervention groups complete their programs.
|
|
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Skala Depresji, Lęku i Stresu (DASS-21)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniano na początku (przed testem) i po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (po teście 1 i 2)
|
Skala mierząca depresję, lęk i stres (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większą depresję, lęk i stres.
|
Oceniano na początku (przed testem) i po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (po teście 1 i 2)
|
|
Skala Samotności UCLA (UCLA)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniano na początku badania (test wstępny) oraz po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (test końcowy 1 i 2)
|
Skala mierząca nasilenie samotności (Döring & Bortz, 1993; Russell et al., 1980).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większą samotność.
|
Oceniano na początku badania (test wstępny) oraz po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (test końcowy 1 i 2)
|
|
Skala Odporności Connora-Davidsona (CD-RISC)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniano na początku (przed testem) i po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (po teście 1 i 2)
|
Skala mierząca odporność psychiczną (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większą odporność.
|
Oceniano na początku (przed testem) i po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (po teście 1 i 2)
|
|
Skala Współczucia Sussex-Oxford dla Siebie i Innych (SOCS)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniano na początku (pretest), po 4 tygodniach szkolenia z empatycznego słuchania (w trakcie interwencji) oraz po 4 tygodniach szkolenia z współczującego słuchania (post-test 1 & 2)
|
Skala mierząca współczucie dla siebie (SOCS-S) i współczucie dla innych (SOCS-O; Gu et al., 2020).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większe współczucie.
|
Oceniano na początku (pretest), po 4 tygodniach szkolenia z empatycznego słuchania (w trakcie interwencji) oraz po 4 tygodniach szkolenia z współczującego słuchania (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Strategie radzenia sobie
Ramy czasowe: Oceniano przy użyciu projektu EMA z pięcioma pomiarami za pomocą powiadomień push dziennie, rozłożonymi na pięć 3-godzinnych interwałów, przez cztery dni w okresie dwóch tygodni, przed testem (Linia bazowa) oraz po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (po interwencji).
|
Niestandardowe pozycje oparte na Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll i in., 2005) oraz Kwestionariuszu Poznawczej Regulacji Emocji (CERQ; Garnefski i in., 2001; Loch i in., 2011) mierzące strategie radzenia sobie (Akceptacja, Pozytywna reinterpretacja, Wsparcie społeczne, Ruminacja, Obwinianie siebie, Rozproszenie).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większe wykorzystanie określonych strategii radzenia sobie.
|
Oceniano przy użyciu projektu EMA z pięcioma pomiarami za pomocą powiadomień push dziennie, rozłożonymi na pięć 3-godzinnych interwałów, przez cztery dni w okresie dwóch tygodni, przed testem (Linia bazowa) oraz po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (po interwencji).
|
|
Skala Aktywnego Empatycznego Słuchania (AELS)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniano na początku (przed testem), po 4 tygodniach szkolenia z empatycznego słuchania (w trakcie interwencji) oraz po 4 tygodniach szkolenia z współczującego słuchania (po teście 1 i 2)
|
Skala mierząca aktywne empatyczne słuchanie (Bodie, 2011).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na bardziej aktywne empatyczne słuchanie.
|
Oceniano na początku (przed testem), po 4 tygodniach szkolenia z empatycznego słuchania (w trakcie interwencji) oraz po 4 tygodniach szkolenia z współczującego słuchania (po teście 1 i 2)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Pitch
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Loudness
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Prosodic Feature Intonation
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software.
The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1).
Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
|
|
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000).
Higher scores indicate more burnout.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring the frequency and intensity of three distinct types of positive emotions: Activated PA (excitement, energy), Relaxed PA (calm, peacefulness), and Safe/Contentment PA (safety, security) (Gilbert et al., 2008).
Higher scores indicate a greater frequency and intensity of experiencing specific types of positive emotions.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Executive control (Flanker Task; FT)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
This task assesses executive control with three indices reaction times (RT), error rates, and the flanker effect (FE) (Trautwein et al., 2016; 2020).
Faster RT, lower error rates and FE indicate higher cognitive control.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Mind-Wandering
Ramy czasowe: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
These two questions embedded in the flanker task assess mind-wandering during attentional performance (Smallwood, 2015).
Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
|
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Klimecki et al., 2014, 2013).
Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Stress intensity
Ramy czasowe: Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
|
Custom item based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990) measuring stress intensity.
Higher scores indicate more intense stress.
|
Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
|
|
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
A scale measuring psychological working conditions (stressors and coping resources) impact employee health and well-being (Kristensen et al., 2005; Nübling, 2005)
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
|
Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
The e-SNAP is a novel assessment paradigm based on the Affect Grid.
Teachers rate their interactions with both students and colleagues in terms of frequency and pleasantness in interactions.
In addition, teachers rate in both the student and colleague networks the relationships among each other, allowing to assess positive relations and network density.
Higher scores indicate more frequent and more positively experienced interactions, as well as more cohesive and positively connected social networks.
|
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
|
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Pozytywny afekt (Siatka afektywna) (mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8-tygodniowej interwencji
|
Ocena stanu emocjonalnego (walencja) i pobudzenia (Russell i in., 1989).
Wyższe wyniki w zakresie walencji i pobudzenia wskazują na bardziej pozytywny afekt i wyższy poziom pobudzenia.
|
Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8-tygodniowej interwencji
|
|
Kwestionariusz Wdzięczności-6 (GQ-5-G) (mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8-tygodniowego okresu
|
Skala mierząca wdzięczność (Hudecek i in., 2021; McCullough i in., 2002).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większą wdzięczność.
|
Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8-tygodniowego okresu
|
|
Skala Życzliwości Wobec Siebie (SCS-SF) (mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane co tydzień w ciągu 8 tygodni
|
Kwestionariusz samoopisowy mierzący życzliwość wobec siebie i współczujące nastawienie do samego siebie (Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większą życzliwość wobec siebie.
|
Oceniane co tydzień w ciągu 8 tygodni
|
|
Pozytywne Tendencyjne Interpretowanie (ERT) (mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniano na początku badania (przed testem) i po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (po teście 1 i 2)
|
To zadanie ocenia tendencję do bardziej pozytywnego oceniania wyrazów twarzy osób, wykorzystując zmodyfikowane sekwencje wyrazów twarzy (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths i in., 2015).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na silniejsze pozytywne nastawienie interpretacyjne.
|
Oceniano na początku badania (przed testem) i po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (po teście 1 i 2)
|
|
Skala Krótkiej Samotności (SLS) (mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8 tygodni
|
Krótka skala mierząca częstotliwość, intensywność i czas trwania samotności (Hughes i in., 2004; Qualter i in., 2021).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większą samotność.
|
Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8 tygodni
|
|
Depresja (PHQ-2) (mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8-tygodniowego kursu
|
Krótka miara przesiewowa oparta na samoopisie oceniająca podstawowe objawy depresyjne, w tym obniżony nastrój i anhedonię (Kroenke i in., 2003).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większe nasilenie objawów depresyjnych.
|
Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8-tygodniowego kursu
|
|
Empatyczna Troska i Cierpienie (IRI) (mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8-tygodniowego kursu
|
Skala mierząca różne aspekty emocji społecznych, w tym osobiste cierpienie i empatyczne zaangażowanie (Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większe osobiste cierpienie lub większe empatyczne zaangażowanie.
|
Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8-tygodniowego kursu
|
|
Bias In-group-Out-group (ERT) (mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane na początku (test wstępny) i po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (test końcowy 1 i 2)
|
To zadanie ocenia tendencję do oceniania osób z własnej grupy jako bardziej pozytywne w rozpoznawaniu emocji na twarzy przy użyciu zmodyfikowanych sekwencji wyrazów twarzy (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths i in., 2015).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na silniejsze uprzedzenie wewnątrzgrupowe-zewnątrzgrupowe.
|
Oceniane na początku (test wstępny) i po 8-tygodniowym okresie interwencji (test końcowy 1 i 2)
|
|
Strategie radzenia sobie (mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8 tygodni
|
Niestandardowe pozycje oparte na Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll i in., 2005) oraz Kwestionariuszu Poznawczej Regulacji Emocji (CERQ; Garnefski i in., 2001; Loch i in., 2011) mierzące Strategie Radzenia Sobie (Akceptacja, Pozytywna Reinterpretacja, Wsparcie Społeczne, Ruminacja, Samooskarżanie, Rozpraszanie).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większe wykorzystanie określonych strategii radzenia sobie.
|
Oceniane co tydzień w trakcie 8 tygodni
|
|
DPR-Affect (Siatka Afektywna; mechanizm wyjaśniający)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniano przez 8 tygodni podczas okresu interwencji, przed codziennym ćwiczeniem
|
Ocena stanu emocjonalnego (walencja) i pobudzenia (Russell i in., 1989) bezpośrednio przed rozpoczęciem Diady.
Wyższe wyniki walencji i pobudzenia wskazują na bardziej pozytywny afekt i wyższy poziom pobudzenia. |
Oceniano przez 8 tygodni podczas okresu interwencji, przed codziennym ćwiczeniem
|
|
DPR-Emocje
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane co tydzień od tygodnia 1 do tygodnia 8, jako część oceny głosu w diadzie (DYVA)
|
Intensywności emocji (np. szczęścia, wdzięczności, smutku, złości) oceniane przez mówcę i przez słuchacza w Diadzie bezpośrednio po Diadzie.
|
Oceniane co tydzień od tygodnia 1 do tygodnia 8, jako część oceny głosu w diadzie (DYVA)
|
|
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025).
Higher scores indicate greater emotion awareness and acceptance.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Perceived Stress (PSS-4) (explanatory mechanism)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
A self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Weekly Mind-Wandering (explanatory mechanism)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
These two questions assess mind-wandering in day-to-day life (Smallwood et al., 2013).
Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
Weekly Thought Patterns (Cube of Thought) (explanatory mechanism)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
These three questions assess polarities of thought orientation or quality (self-other, past-future, pleasant-unpleasant) (Petzold et al. 2023).
Higher scores indicate a higher level in each respective dimension.
|
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
|
|
DPR-involvement (explanatory mechanism)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
Assessment of listening involvement (1 custom item; only post-Dyad exercise).
Higher scores indicate more listening involvement.
|
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
|
DPR-Listening-Affect
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated affective state during listening to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for.
Higher scores indicate a more positive affect.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
|
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise).
Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013).
|
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
|
|
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner.
Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
|
Dyad empathic and compassionate listening skills (DPR-listening-skills)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated skill of listening empathically and compassionately to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for.
Higher scores indicate a higher degree of empathic or compassionate listening respectively.
|
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
|
Inne miary wyników
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Kwestionariusz Zdrowia Pacjenta (PHQ-9; wstępne badanie przesiewowe)
Ramy czasowe: Oceniane przed interwencją, tylko raz, aby wstępnie wykluczyć z badania osoby, u których występują kliniczne objawy depresji
|
Skala oceny depresji (Löwe i in., 2004; Martin i in., 2006).
Wyższe wyniki wskazują na większą depresję.
|
Oceniane przed interwencją, tylko raz, aby wstępnie wykluczyć z badania osoby, u których występują kliniczne objawy depresji
|
|
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
|
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000).
Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; pre-screening)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
|
A scale assessing generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007).
Higher scores indicate more anxiety.
|
Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
|
|
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
Ramy czasowe: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
|
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
|
|
General demographic questions
Ramy czasowe: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
|
Self-generated demographic items.
|
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Śledczy
- Główny śledczy: Tania Singer, PhD, Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
- Główny śledczy: Philipp Beuchel, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
- Główny śledczy: Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
Daty zapisu na studia
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)
Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)
Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
Ostatnia weryfikacja
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Słowa kluczowe
- Empatia
- Odporność
- Współczucie
- Nauczyciele szkolni
- Trening mentalny
- Szkolenie w parach
- Zdrowie Psychiczne
- Szkolenia online i aplikacyjne
- Ocena głosu oparta na sztucznej inteligencji
- Compassionate Listening
- Empathic Listening
- Mindfulness-based Training
- Social Emotions
- e-SNAP
- Perceive Psychosocial Work Environment
Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- Edu:Social School Study 2
Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)
Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?
Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze
Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .
Badania kliniczne na Grupa kontrolna listy oczekujących
-
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteZakończonyCiężka otyłość dziecięca (BMI > 97° szt. -według wykresów BMI Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-) | Zmienione testy czynnościowe wątroby | Nietolerancja glikemicznaWłochy