Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for School Teachers' Well-being and Social Skills (EduSocSchool2)

4 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab

Edu:Social School Study2: Promoting Well-being and Socio-emotional Skills for School Teachers With App-based Mindfulness and Dyadic Empathy-compassion Trainings.

The Edu:Social School Study 2 is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an 8-week socio-emotional, partner-based empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo) compared with a mindfulness-based training (MBT) and a waitlist control group (WLC) in school teachers.

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the adapted 8-week online EmCo Dyad training program across multiple domains of teacher functioning. Seven domains capture individual-level outcomes: (1) mental health, (2) resilience, (3) attention and cognitive processes, (4) social emotions, (5) stress coping and emotion regulation, (6) listening skills, and (7) voice-based emotional expression (DYVA). Two additional domains assess broader contextual outcomes: (8) classroom teaching and (9) organizational/school level outcomes, reflecting how individual-level changes may translate into perceived changes in the teaching and school context.

To this end, participants will be randomized into one of three groups: (1) an 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention (EmCo), (2) an 8-week mindfulness-based training program (MBT), or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC) that will receive the EmCo intervention after completion of the initial post-test. Both interventions are delivered online via a dedicated study application to ensure scalability and accessibility.

A second aim is to validate the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) as a measure of teachers' perceived social interactions and network structures. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial in teachers to examine whether changes in internal psychological processes are associated with perceived changes in the perception of the quality of interaction between school teachers and their students in the classroom as well as between school teachers and their colleagues in school.

A third aim is to introduce and validate objective measures of emotional processing based on AI-based voice analysis in educational field research. Specifically, the study will evaluate two tasks using different parameters of AI-based emotional voice analysis: (a) the Teacher Voice Assessment (TEAVA), in which teachers' voices are recorded during a teaching-related task, and (b) the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA), conducted during the daily partner-based Dyad practice. In both tasks, non-semantic vocal features (e.g., pitch, loudness, speaking rate, intonation) and vocal emotional expressions (e.g., arousal, valence, dominance, and basic emotional categories) will be analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. No speech content will be transcribed or analyzed.

A final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying intervention-related changes. Based on prior research, the EmCo Dyad training is expected to enhance care- and affiliation-related motivational systems associated with positive affect, social emotions and connectedness, and prosocial behavior, while reducing loneliness, social stress, and other forms of psychological vulnerability. In contrast, mindfulness-based training is expected to primarily strengthen attention- and thought-related processes, including present-moment awareness, calming the mind and executive attentional control. These mechanisms are expected to contribute to improvements in mental health and overall well-being across both intervention groups.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

The teaching profession is widely recognized as highly demanding, and teachers report elevated rates of stress and burnout. If left unaddressed, burnout adversely affects teachers' health, job performance, teaching quality, and school turnover rates. Moreover, teacher burnout has important consequences for students. Teachers' emotional exhaustion has been shown to negatively affect students' academic achievement and self-concept in Germany. Given teachers' pivotal role in shaping children's socio-emotional development, addressing psychological vulnerability-including stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and exhaustion-is essential. Strengthening resilience enables teachers to maintain well-being and effective classroom functioning in the face of adversity by supporting adaptive stress management. In addition, strong interpersonal skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening play an important role in the teacher-student communication. Addressing psychological vulnerability and strengthening resilience and social skills, is essential not only for teacher well-being but also for the functioning of educational systems broadly.

In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices (Dyads), which specifically target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, social connectedness and different types of listening. However, dyadic interventions, that is daily mental practices done with a partner, have not yet been systematically investigated in educational settings. Existing evidence suggests that contemplative Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, enhancing social connection, and strengthening resilience. Moreover, dyadic practices appear to engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.

Empathy, (self-)compassion, and high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in school contexts. However, empathy may lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective due to its association with positive affect and prosocial motivation. To address this distinction, the Edu:Social School Study 2 implements an empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains participants in empathic listening and emotion regulation during the first four weeks, followed by (self-)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.

The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. These two large-scale mental training studies, have shown that different types of practices produce distinct effects on psychological and biological outcomes. The ReSource project, a 9-month longitudinal study using behavioral, hormonal, autonomic and neuroimaging (fMRI) measures, compared three training modules, including a mindfulness-based "Presence" module, a socio-affective "Affect" module (including the Affect Dyad) and a socio-cognitive "Perspective" module, and demonstrated that training content differentially affects mind, behavior and brain. Building on this work, the CovSocial project implemented a 10-week fully online design comparing a low-dose purely online socio-emotional Dyad training with a mindfulness-based active control training group. Results showed both shared and distinct effects: while both interventions improved mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and compassion, the Dyad training showed stronger effects on resilience, positivity bias, social connectedness, and reductions in loneliness and social stress.

Further, mediation analyses suggest that individual mindfulness practices and partner-based Dyadic practices influence well-being through partly distinct psychological mechanisms, whereas care-based motivational processes could account for Dyad-practice effects and thought-related process for mindfulness-practice effects.

Compared with these prior interventions, the present Edu:Social School intervention program introduces a novel empathy versus compassion listening component and reduces the duration from 10 to 8 weeks, improving feasibility within applied school settings. In an initial Edu:Social School pilot study, 120 teachers participated in a 10-week socio-emotional training program (EmCo). The pilot demonstrated high compliance and provided preliminary evidence for reductions in psychological vulnerability. However, the study lacked an active control group and a reliable waitlist control group, limiting interpretation. In addition, the 10-week duration was difficult to implement within the German school calendar.

The present study is a randomized controlled trial in a sample of school teachers (target N = 900). A multimethod assessment approach will be used, including validated trait and state self-report questionnaires, behavioral phone-based tasks administered via an app application, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered through smartphone notifications. These different assessments are capturing changes across the nine domains mentioned before.

After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) an empathy-compassion training group (EmCo), based on the Affect Dyad daily mental practice; (2) a mindfulness-based training group, based on attention-based mindfulness practices; or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC). All participants will first complete a pre-test assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, phone-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention groups will then be onboarded through two group-specific online sessions (Onboarding I and II) led by trained instructors, followed by participation in their respective 8-week programs delivered via a dedicated web and smartphone application. These programs include daily partner-based Dyad practices or mindfulness meditations, respectively, as well as weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. Throughout the intervention period, participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR) to assess changes in key psychological and social processes, which will be examined as potential mediators. At the end of the intervention, all participants will complete a post-test assessment phase comparable to the pre-test (T0) and mid-test (TM), with the addition of a final feedback questionnaire.

Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the waitlist control group will subsequently receive the same 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo) and complete an additional mid-tests (TM1) and post-test assessment (T2). After both training groups (EmCo and MBT) have completed their respective interventions, participants will be offered the opportunity to continue their practice via the study app. Participants in the EmCo group will be invited to continue the Dyad practice, whereas participants in the MBT group may choose to continue either the mindfulness-based practice or switch to the EmCo Dyad intervention. This phase of voluntary continued practice will take place in parallel with the 8-week EmCo Dyad training offered to the WLC following post-test.

The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at https://osf.io/x59pk

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

900

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Lab Manager Social Neuroscience Lab
  • Número de teléfono: +49 30 209346-180
  • Correo electrónico: office@social.mpg.de

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18- and 68-years old.
  • Currently working as a school teacher in Germany or Austria; grades 1-12; primary, secondary, special needs, and vocational schools.
  • Proficient in German.
  • Informed consent.
  • No symptoms of psychiatric disease within the past two years; healthy population, non-clinical population.
  • Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient German proficiency.
  • Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No informed consent.
  • Not currently working as a school teacher.
  • Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).
  • Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:

    • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Martin et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2004; Cutoff ≥ 20; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
    • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15),
    • Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)

      • In addition, participants will complete the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003) which is not used as quantitative exclusion criteria in step 3, but provides additional information to support the phone call with one of the teachers, as part of the screening process.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Ciencia básica
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
The socio-emotional intervention will consist of two 1.5h online onboarding I and II sessions and then 8 weeks of weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert teachers as well as daily dyad practice with a partner over 8 week.
  1. Participants engage in a structured 13-minute partner-based contemplative exercise. Each dyad reflects on two experiences from the previous 24 hours: one involving a difficult emotion and one involving gratitude. Partners take turns speaking while the other listens non-judgmentally. During weeks 1-4, the practice emphasizes empathic listening; during weeks 5-8, compassionate listening. Participants are instructed to attend to bodily sensations associated with the emotions described. The practice aims to improve coping with difficult emotions, empathic and compassionate listening, (self)acceptance, compassion, gratitude, resilience.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert Dyad teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the Dyad practice and educate teachers about body language, coping better with difficult emotions/stress, the benefits of empathy versus compassion and the act of listening from a mindset of empathy versus compassion.
Comparador activo: Mindfulness-based Training (MBT)
MBT includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily mindfulness practice over 8 weeks.
  1. In this intervention, participants will practice 13-minute basic attention-based mindfulness meditation such as the Breathing Meditation (BM). BM is a 13-minute individual exercise that requires participants to focus their attention on the sensations of breathing. Participants have to sustain their attention to breath for long stretches of time, and have to return their attention to their breath when their mind wanders. The key focus is on training attention and interoceptive body awareness. Other practices participants will be taught is mindfulness on sounds (here the object of attention is not the breath but sounds in the environment) as well as open presence meditation.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert mindfulness teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the mindfulness practice and educate teachers about bodily sensations, attention, rumination.
Otro: Waitlist Control Group (WLC)
WLC receives EmCo training only after both intervention groups complete their programs.
  1. Initially, participants in the WLC group will not receive the intervention. They will complete pre- and post-test procedures consisting primarily of self-report questionnaires, and behavioral tasks, as well as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) conducted on four days within two weeks at pre-test and post-test 1 & 2.
  2. The WLC will be offered the EmCo training only after both intervention groups have completed their trainings

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Escala de Depresión, Ansiedad y Estrés (DASS-21)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado al inicio (prueba previa) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (prueba posterior 1 y 2)
Una escala que mide la depresión, la ansiedad y el estrés (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021). Las puntuaciones más altas indican más depresión, ansiedad y estrés.
Evaluado al inicio (prueba previa) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (prueba posterior 1 y 2)
Escala de Soledad de la UCLA (UCLA)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado al inicio (prueba previa) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (prueba posterior 1 y 2)
Una escala que mide la gravedad de la soledad (Döring & Bortz, 1993; Russell et al., 1980).
Las puntuaciones más altas indican mayor soledad.
Evaluado al inicio (prueba previa) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (prueba posterior 1 y 2)
Escala de Resiliencia Connor Davidson (CD-RISC)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado al inicio (preprueba) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (posprueba 1 y 2)
Una escala que mide la resiliencia psicológica (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015). Puntuaciones más altas indican mayor resiliencia.
Evaluado al inicio (preprueba) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (posprueba 1 y 2)
Escala de Compasión Sussex-Oxford para Uno Mismo y los Demás (SOCS)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado al inicio (preprueba), después de 4 semanas de entrenamiento en escucha empática (durante la intervención) y después de las 4 semanas de entrenamiento en escucha compasiva (posprueba 1 y 2)
Una escala que mide la autocompasión (SOCS-S) y la compasión por los demás (SOCS-O; Gu et al., 2020).
Puntuaciones más altas indican mayor compasión.
Evaluado al inicio (preprueba), después de 4 semanas de entrenamiento en escucha empática (durante la intervención) y después de las 4 semanas de entrenamiento en escucha compasiva (posprueba 1 y 2)
Estrategias de afrontamiento
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado mediante un diseño EMA con cinco mediciones de notificaciones push al día, distribuidas en cinco intervalos de 3 horas, durante cuatro días en un período de dos semanas, en la prueba previa (línea base) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (post-intervención).
Elementos personalizados basados en el Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) y el Cuestionario de Regulación Emocional Cognitiva (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) que miden Estrategias de Afrontamiento (Aceptación, Reinterpretación Positiva, Apoyo Social, Rumia, Autoculpa, Distracción). Puntuaciones más altas indican un mayor uso de las estrategias de afrontamiento especificadas.
Evaluado mediante un diseño EMA con cinco mediciones de notificaciones push al día, distribuidas en cinco intervalos de 3 horas, durante cuatro días en un período de dos semanas, en la prueba previa (línea base) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (post-intervención).
Escala de Escucha Empática Activa (AELS)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado al inicio (pre-test), después de 4 semanas de entrenamiento en escucha empática (intervención intermedia) y después de las 4 semanas de entrenamiento en escucha compasiva (post-test 1 y 2)
Una escala que mide la escucha empática activa (Bodie, 2011). Puntuaciones más altas indican una mayor escucha empática activa.
Evaluado al inicio (pre-test), después de 4 semanas de entrenamiento en escucha empática (intervención intermedia) y después de las 4 semanas de entrenamiento en escucha compasiva (post-test 1 y 2)
Prosodic Feature Pitch
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Loudness
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Intonation
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1). Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000). Higher scores indicate more burnout.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring the frequency and intensity of three distinct types of positive emotions: Activated PA (excitement, energy), Relaxed PA (calm, peacefulness), and Safe/Contentment PA (safety, security) (Gilbert et al., 2008). Higher scores indicate a greater frequency and intensity of experiencing specific types of positive emotions.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Executive control (Flanker Task; FT)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses executive control with three indices reaction times (RT), error rates, and the flanker effect (FE) (Trautwein et al., 2016; 2020). Faster RT, lower error rates and FE indicate higher cognitive control.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Mind-Wandering
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
These two questions embedded in the flanker task assess mind-wandering during attentional performance (Smallwood, 2015). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Klimecki et al., 2014, 2013). Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
Stress intensity
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Custom item based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990) measuring stress intensity. Higher scores indicate more intense stress.
Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring psychological working conditions (stressors and coping resources) impact employee health and well-being (Kristensen et al., 2005; Nübling, 2005)
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
The e-SNAP is a novel assessment paradigm based on the Affect Grid. Teachers rate their interactions with both students and colleagues in terms of frequency and pleasantness in interactions. In addition, teachers rate in both the student and colleague networks the relationships among each other, allowing to assess positive relations and network density. Higher scores indicate more frequent and more positively experienced interactions, as well as more cohesive and positively connected social networks.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Afecto Positivo (Cuadrícula de Afecto) (mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas de intervención
Evaluación del estado emocional (valencia) y la excitación (Russell et al., 1989). Puntuaciones más altas en valencia y excitación indican un afecto más positivo y una mayor excitación.
Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas de intervención
Cuestionario de Gratitud-6 (GQ-5-G) (mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Una escala que mide la gratitud (Hudecek et al., 2021; McCullough et al., 2002). Las puntuaciones más altas indican mayor gratitud.
Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Escala de Autocompasión (SCS-SF) (mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Un cuestionario de autoinforme que mide la autocompasión y las actitudes compasivas hacia uno mismo (Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011). Puntuaciones más altas indican una mayor autocompasión.
Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Sesgo de Interpretación Positiva (ERT) (mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado al inicio (preprueba) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (postprueba 1 y 2)
Esta tarea evalúa la tendencia a juzgar las expresiones faciales de las personas de manera más positiva utilizando secuencias morfológicas de expresiones faciales (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015). Las puntuaciones más altas indican un sesgo de interpretación positiva más fuerte.
Evaluado al inicio (preprueba) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (postprueba 1 y 2)
Escala Breve de Soledad (SLS) (mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Una escala breve que mide la frecuencia, intensidad y duración de la soledad (Hughes et al., 2004; Qualter et al., 2021). Las puntuaciones más altas indican mayor soledad.
Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Depresión (PHQ-2) (mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Una breve medida de evaluación autoinformada que evalúa los síntomas centrales de la depresión, incluyendo el estado de ánimo deprimido y la anhedonia (Kroenke et al., 2003). Las puntuaciones más altas indican una mayor gravedad de los síntomas depresivos.
Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Preocupación Empática y Malestar (IRI) (mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Una escala que mide diferentes facetas de las emociones sociales, incluyendo el malestar personal y la preocupación empática (Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009). Las puntuaciones más altas indican mayor malestar personal o preocupación empática.
Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Sesgo endogrupo-exogrupo (ERT) (mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado en la línea de base (pretest) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (postest 1 y 2)
Esta tarea evalúa la tendencia a juzgar a las personas del propio grupo como más positivas en el reconocimiento de emociones faciales mediante secuencias morfeadas de expresiones faciales (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015). Puntuaciones más altas indican un sesgo más fuerte entre el endogrupo y el exogrupo.
Evaluado en la línea de base (pretest) y después del período de intervención de 8 semanas (postest 1 y 2)
Estrategias de afrontamiento (mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
Elementos personalizados basados en el Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) y el Cuestionario de Regulación Emocional Cognitiva (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) que miden Estrategias de Afrontamiento (Aceptación, Reinterpretación Positiva, Apoyo Social, Rumia, Autoculpa, Distracción). Puntuaciones más altas indican un mayor uso de las estrategias de afrontamiento especificadas.
Evaluado semanalmente durante el transcurso de 8 semanas
DPR-Affect (Cuadrícula de Afecto; mecanismo explicativo)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado durante 8 semanas en el período de intervención, antes del ejercicio diario
Evaluación del estado emocional (valencia) y la excitación (Russell et al., 1989) justo antes de comenzar el Dúo. Puntuaciones más altas en valencia y excitación indican un afecto más positivo y una mayor excitación.
Evaluado durante 8 semanas en el período de intervención, antes del ejercicio diario
DPR-Emociones
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado semanalmente desde la semana 1 hasta la semana 8, como parte de la Evaluación de Voz Diádica (DYVA)
Intensidades emocionales (de, por ejemplo, felicidad, gratitud, tristeza, ira) evaluadas por el hablante y por el oyente de un díada directamente después de la díada.
Evaluado semanalmente desde la semana 1 hasta la semana 8, como parte de la Evaluación de Voz Diádica (DYVA)
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025). Higher scores indicate greater emotion awareness and acceptance.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Perceived Stress (PSS-4) (explanatory mechanism)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016). Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Mind-Wandering (explanatory mechanism)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These two questions assess mind-wandering in day-to-day life (Smallwood et al., 2013). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Thought Patterns (Cube of Thought) (explanatory mechanism)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These three questions assess polarities of thought orientation or quality (self-other, past-future, pleasant-unpleasant) (Petzold et al. 2023). Higher scores indicate a higher level in each respective dimension.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
DPR-involvement (explanatory mechanism)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of listening involvement (1 custom item; only post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more listening involvement.
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
DPR-Listening-Affect
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated affective state during listening to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a more positive affect.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013).
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad empathic and compassionate listening skills (DPR-listening-skills)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated skill of listening empathically and compassionately to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of empathic or compassionate listening respectively.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente (PHQ-9; pre-tamizaje)
Periodo de tiempo: Evaluado antes de la intervención, solo una vez, para excluir previamente del estudio a individuos que presenten niveles clínicos de síntomas depresivos
Una escala para evaluar la depresión (Löwe et al., 2004; Martin et al., 2006). Las puntuaciones más altas indican mayor depresión.
Evaluado antes de la intervención, solo una vez, para excluir previamente del estudio a individuos que presenten niveles clínicos de síntomas depresivos
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000). Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; pre-screening)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
A scale assessing generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007). Higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
General demographic questions
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
Self-generated demographic items.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Tania Singer, PhD, Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • Investigador principal: Philipp Beuchel, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • Investigador principal: Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

20 de diciembre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

3 de abril de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

26 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

9 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

9 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Grupo de control de lista de espera

Suscribir