A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eculizumab in Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS): Protocol of Japanese Eculizumab Trial for GBS (JET-GBS)

Nobuko Yamaguchi, Sonoko Misawa, Yasunori Sato, Kengo Nagashima, Kanako Katayama, Yukari Sekiguchi, Yuta Iwai, Hiroshi Amino, Tomoki Suichi, Takanori Yokota, Yoichiro Nishida, Nobuo Kohara, Koichi Hirata, Kazutoshi Nishiyama, Ichiro Yabe, Ken-Ichi Kaida, Norihiro Suzuki, Hiroyuki Nodera, Shoji Tsuji, Haruki Koike, Jun-Ichi Kira, Hideki Hanaoka, Susumu Kusunoki, Satoshi Kuwabara, JET-GBS Group, Nobuko Yamaguchi, Sonoko Misawa, Yasunori Sato, Kengo Nagashima, Kanako Katayama, Yukari Sekiguchi, Yuta Iwai, Hiroshi Amino, Tomoki Suichi, Takanori Yokota, Yoichiro Nishida, Nobuo Kohara, Koichi Hirata, Kazutoshi Nishiyama, Ichiro Yabe, Ken-Ichi Kaida, Norihiro Suzuki, Hiroyuki Nodera, Shoji Tsuji, Haruki Koike, Jun-Ichi Kira, Hideki Hanaoka, Susumu Kusunoki, Satoshi Kuwabara, JET-GBS Group

Abstract

Background: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated neuropathy that causes acute flaccid paralysis. Immunoglobulin and plasma exchange are established treatments for GBS; however, a substantial number of patients, particularly those with severe disease, have poor recovery and residual deficits. Recent studies suggest that complement activation plays a pivotal role in GBS-associated axonal degeneration, and eculizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to complement component 5 and potently inhibits complement activation.

Objective: This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against complement component 5, for treatment of GBS.

Methods: The Japanese Eculizumab Trial for GBS (JET-GBS) is a prospective, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase II study conducted at 13 tertiary neurology centers and is funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. A total of 33 GBS patients unable to walk independently within 2 weeks from symptom onset (Hughes functional grade 3-5) were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to receive either intravenous eculizumab (900 mg/day) or placebo once weekly for 4 weeks, followed by 20 weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint for efficacy is the proportion of patients who regain their ability to walk without aid at 4 weeks after the first dose of the study treatment, while primary safety outcomes are the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events during the trial.

Results: Enrollment for the trial began in August 2015. This trial is still ongoing. All participants have been enrolled, and follow-up will be completed in October 2016.

Conclusions: This study is the first to investigate the efficacy and safety of eculizumab for GBS. In case of a positive result, we will plan a phase III trial to investigate this issue in a larger number of patients.

Clinicaltrial: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN 000018171; https:/upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function= brows&action=brows&type=summary&language=J&recptno=R000020978 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/ 6lTiG8ltG). Clinical Trials.gov NCT02493725; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02493725 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6lVJZXKSL).

Keywords: Guillain-Barré syndrome; antiganglioside antibody; clinical trial; complement activation; eculizumab.

Conflict of interest statement

The investigational product is provided by US-based Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc under the Global Investigator-Sponsored Research Program. The interest profile of this trial is to be reviewed and approved by the conflict of interest committees of the participating sites, all in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements and guidelines, and potential conflicts addressed through conflict of interest management and integrity assurance efforts.

©Nobuko Yamaguchi, Sonoko Misawa, Yasunori Sato, Kengo Nagashima, Kanako Katayama, Yukari Sekiguchi, Yuta Iwai, Hiroshi Amino, Tomoki Suichi, Takanori Yokota, Yoichiro Nishida, Nobuo Kohara, Koichi Hirata, Kazutoshi Nishiyama, Ichiro Yabe, Ken-Ichi Kaida, Norihiro Suzuki, Hiroyuki Nodera, Shoji Tsuji, Haruki Koike, Jun-Ichi Kira, Hideki Hanaoka, Susumu Kusunoki, Satoshi Kuwabara, JET-GBS Group. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 07.11.2016.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic depiction of the trial design. The study is composed of 3 periods: the screening period, investigational product (IP) administration period (4 weeks), and post-IP period follow-up (20 weeks).

References

    1. Osler LD, Sidell AD. The Guillain-Barre syndrome; the need for exact diagnostic criteria. N Engl J Med. 1960 May 12;262:964–969. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196005122621905.
    1. Hughes RA, Cornblath DR. Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet. 2005 Nov 5;366(9497):1653–1666. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67665-9.
    1. Sejvar JJ, Baughman AL, Wise M, Morgan OW. Population incidence of Guillain-Barre syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2011;36(2):123–133. doi: 10.1159/000324710.
    1. Hughes RA, Swan AV, van Doorn PA. Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;CD002063(9) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002063.pub6.
    1. Raphaël JC, Chevret S, Hughes RA, Annane D. Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;CD001798(7) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001798.pub2.
    1. Rajabally YA, Uncini A. Outcome and its predictors in Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;83(7):711–718. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301882.
    1. Kuwabara S, Yuki N. Axonal Guillain-Barre syndrome: concepts and controversies. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Dec;12(12):1180–1188. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70215-1.
    1. Susuki K, Rasband MN, Tohyama K, Koibuchi K, Okamoto S, Funakoshi K, Hirata K, Baba H, Yuki N. Anti-GM1 antibodies cause complement-mediated disruption of sodium channel clusters in peripheral motor nerve fibers. J Neurosci. 2007 Apr 11;27(15):3956–3967. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4401-06.2007.
    1. Susuki K, Yuki N, Schafer DP, Hirata K, Zhang G, Funakoshi K, Rasband MN. Dysfunction of nodes of Ranvier: a mechanism for anti-ganglioside antibody-mediated neuropathies. Exp Neurol. 2012 Jan;233(1):534–542. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.11.039.
    1. Phongsisay V, Susuki K, Matsuno K, Yamahashi T, Okamoto S, Funakoshi K, Hirata K, Shinoda M, Yuki N. Complement inhibitor prevents disruption of sodium channel clusters in a rabbit model of Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Neuroimmunol. 2008 Dec 15;205(1-2):101–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.09.016.
    1. Zuber J, Fakhouri F, Roumenina LT, Loirat C, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, French Study Group for aHUS/C3G Use of eculizumab for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012 Nov;8(11):643–657. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2012.214.
    1. Rother RP, Rollins SA, Mojcik CF, Brodsky RA, Bell L. Discovery and development of the complement inhibitor eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Nov;25(11):1256–1264. doi: 10.1038/nbt1344.
    1. Legendre CM, Licht C, Muus P, Greenbaum LA, Babu S, Bedrosian C, Bingham C, Cohen DJ, Delmas Y, Douglas K, Eitner F, Feldkamp T, Fouque D, Furman RR, Gaber O, Herthelius M, Hourmant M, Karpman D, Lebranchu Y, Mariat C, Menne J, Moulin B, Nürnberger J, Ogawa M, Remuzzi G, Richard T, Sberro-Soussan R, Severino B, Sheerin NS, Trivelli A, Zimmerhackl LB, Goodship T, Loirat C. Terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2169–2181. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208981.
    1. Hillmen P, Hall C, Marsh JC, Elebute M, Bombara MP, Petro BE, Cullen MJ, Richards SJ, Rollins SA, Mojcik CF, Rother RP. Effect of eculizumab on hemolysis and transfusion requirements in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 5;350(6):552–559. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031688.
    1. Halstead SK, Zitman FM, Humphreys PD, Greenshields K, Verschuuren JJ, Jacobs BC, Rother RP, Plomp JJ, Willison HJ. Eculizumab prevents anti-ganglioside antibody-mediated neuropathy in a murine model. Brain. 2008 May;131(Pt 5):1197–1208. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm316.
    1. Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1990;27 Suppl:S21–S24.
    1. Sekiguchi Y, Uncini A, Yuki N, Misawa S, Notturno F, Nasu S, Kanai K, Noto Y, Fujimaki Y, Shibuya K, Ohmori S, Sato Y, Kuwabara S. Antiganglioside antibodies are associated with axonal Guillain-Barre syndrome: a Japanese-Italian collaborative study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;83(1):23–28. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300309.
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975 Mar;31(1):103–115.
    1. Brown S, Thorpe H, Hawkins K, Brown J. Minimization: reducing predictability for multi-centre trials whilst retaining balance within centre. Stat Med. 2005 Dec 30;24(24):3715–3727. doi: 10.1002/sim.2391.
    1. Pritchard J, Gray IA, Idrissova ZR, Lecky BR, Sutton IJ, Swan AV, Willison HJ, Winer JB, Hughes RA. A randomized controlled trial of recombinant interferon-beta 1a in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology. 2003 Nov 11;61(9):1282–1284.
    1. Bensa S, Hadden RD, Hahn A, Hughes RA, Willison HJ. Randomized controlled trial of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in Guillain-Barre syndrome: a pilot study. Eur J Neurol. 2000 Jul;7(4):423–426.
    1. Garssen MP, van Koningsveld KR, van Doorn PA, Merkies IS, Scheltens-de Boer M, van Leusden JA, van Schaik IN, Linssen WH, Visscher F, Boon AM, Faber CG, Meulstee J, Prick MJ, van den Berg LH, Franssen H, Hiel JA, van den Bergh PY, Sindic CJ. Treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome with mycophenolate mofetil: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;78(9):1012–1013. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.102731.
    1. Hafer-Macko CE, Sheikh KA, Li CY, Ho TW, Cornblath DR, McKhann GM, Asbury AK, Griffin JW. Immune attack on the Schwann cell surface in acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Ann Neurol. 1996 May;39(5):625–635. doi: 10.1002/ana.410390512.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다