Effect of Layperson-Delivered, Empathy-Focused Program of Telephone Calls on Loneliness, Depression, and Anxiety Among Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Maninder K Kahlon, Nazan Aksan, Rhonda Aubrey, Nicole Clark, Maria Cowley-Morillo, Elizabeth A Jacobs, Rhonda Mundhenk, Katherine R Sebastian, Steven Tomlinson, Maninder K Kahlon, Nazan Aksan, Rhonda Aubrey, Nicole Clark, Maria Cowley-Morillo, Elizabeth A Jacobs, Rhonda Mundhenk, Katherine R Sebastian, Steven Tomlinson

Abstract

Importance: Loneliness is a risk factor for many clinical conditions, but there are few effective interventions deployable at scale.

Objective: To determine whether a layperson-delivered, empathy-focused program of telephone calls could rapidly improve loneliness, depression, and anxiety in at-risk adults.

Design, setting, and participants: From July 6 to September 24, 2020, we recruited and followed up 240 adults who were assigned to receive calls (intervention group) or no calls (control group) via block randomization. Loneliness, depression, and anxiety were measured using validated scales at enrollment and after 4 weeks. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted. Meals on Wheels Central Texas (MOWCTX) clients received calls in their homes or wherever they might have been when the call was received. The study included MOWCTX clients who fit their service criteria, including being homebound and expressing a need for food. A total of 296 participants were screened, of whom 240 were randomized to intervention or control.

Interventions: Sixteen callers, aged 17 to 23 years, were briefly trained in empathetic conversational techniques. Each called 6 to 9 participants over 4 weeks daily for the first 5 days, after which clients could choose to drop down to fewer calls but no less than 2 calls a week.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was loneliness (3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale, range 3-9; and 6-item De Jong Giervald Loneliness [De Jong] Scale, range 0-6). Secondary outcomes were depression (Personal Health Questionnaire for Depression), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale), and self-rated health (Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire).

Results: The 240 participants were aged 27 to 101 years, with 63% aged at least 65 years (n = 149 of 232), 56% living alone (n = 135 of 240), 79% women (n = 190 of 240), 39% Black or African American (n = 94 of 240), and 22% Hispanic or Latino (n = 52 of 240), and all reported at least 1 chronic condition. Of 240 participants enrolled, 13 were lost to follow-up in the intervention arm and 1 in the control arm. Postassessment differences between intervention and control after 4 weeks showed an improvement of 1.1 on the UCLA Loneliness Scale (95% CI, 0.5-1.7; P < .001; Cohen d of 0.48), and improvement of 0.32 on De Jong (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.81; P = .06; Cohen d, 0.17) for loneliness; an improvement of 1.5 on the Personal Health Questionnaire for Depression (95% CI, 0.22-2.7; P < .001; Cohen d, 0.31) for depression; and an improvement of 1.8 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (95% CI, 0.44 to 3.2; P < .001; Cohen d, 0.35) for anxiety. General physical health on the Short Form Health Questionnaire Survey showed no change, but mental health improved by 2.6 (95% CI, 0.81 to 4.4; P = .003; Cohen d of 0.46).

Conclusions and relevance: A layperson-delivered, empathy-oriented telephone call program reduced loneliness, depression, and anxiety compared with the control group and improved the general mental health of participants within 4 weeks. Future research can determine whether effects on depression and anxiety can be extended to maximize clinical relevance.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04595708.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Kahlon, Aksan, Aubrey, and Clark reported grants from Episcopal Health Foundation during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. CONSORT Diagram: Flow of Participants…
Figure 1.. CONSORT Diagram: Flow of Participants Through the Trial
Figure 2.. Box Plots of Changes in…
Figure 2.. Box Plots of Changes in Loneliness, Depression, Anxiety, and General Mental Health Over 4 Weeks in the Intervention and Control Arms
Box plot indicates median, interquartile range, and lower and upper adjacent values. De Jong indicates De Jong Giervald Loneliness Scale; GAD-7, Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale; PHQ-8, Personal Health Questionnaire for Depression; SF-12-MH, Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire Mental Health; UCLA, UCLA Loneliness Scale.

References

    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020. doi:10.17226/25663.
    1. Cacioppo JT, Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychol Aging. 2006;21(1):140-151. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140
    1. Luchetti M, Lee JH, Aschwanden D, et al. . The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19. Am Psychol. 2020;75(7):897-908. doi:10.1037/amp0000690
    1. McGinty EE, Presskreischer R, Han H, Barry CL. Psychological distress and loneliness reported by US adults in 2018 and April 2020. JAMA. 2020;324(1):93-94. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.9740
    1. Killgore WDS, Cloonan SA, Taylor EC, Dailey NS. Loneliness: a signature mental health concern in the era of COVID-19. Psychiatry Res. 2020;290:113117. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113117
    1. Bu F, Steptoe A, Fancourt D. Loneliness during a strict lockdown: trajectories and predictors during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38,217 United Kingdom adults. Soc Sci Med. 2020;265:113521. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113521
    1. van Tilburg TG, Steinmetz S, Stolte E, van der Roest H, de Vries DH. Loneliness and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study among Dutch older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020:gbaa111. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaa111
    1. McGinty EE, Presskreischer R, Anderson KE, Han H, Barry CL. Psychological distress and COVID-19–related stressors reported in a longitudinal cohort of US adults in April and July 2020. JAMA. 2020;324(24):2555-2557. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.21231
    1. Vahia IV, Jeste DV, Reynolds CF III. Older adults and the mental health effects of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(22):2253-2254. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.21753
    1. Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219-266. doi:10.1177/1088868310377394
    1. Choi NG, Pepin R, Marti CN, Stevens CJ, Bruce ML. Improving social connectedness for homebound older adults: randomized controlled trial of tele-delivered behavioral activation versus tele-delivered friendly visits. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;28(7):698-708. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.02.008
    1. Penning MJ, Liu G, Chou PH. Measuring loneliness among middle-aged and older adults: the UCLA and de Jong Gierveld loneliness scales. Soc Indic Res. 2014;118:1147-1166. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0461-1.
    1. De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg T. The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. Eur J Ageing. 2010;7(2):121-130. doi:10.1007/s10433-010-0144-6
    1. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi:10.1177/0164027504268574
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group . CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332. doi:10.1136/bmj.c332
    1. De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg TG. A six-item scale for overall, emotional and social loneliness: confirmatory tests on new survey data. Res Aging. 2006;28(5)582–598. doi:10.1177/0164027506289723.
    1. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220-233. doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
    1. Shin C, Lee SH, Han KM, Yoon HK, Han C. Comparison of the usefulness of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 for screening for major depressive disorder: analysis of psychiatric outpatient data. Psychiatry Investig. 2019;16(4):300-305. doi:10.30773/pi.2019.02.01
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092-1097. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
    1. Chiang KJ, Chu H, Chang HJ, et al. . The effects of reminiscence therapy on psychological well-being, depression, and loneliness among the institutionalized aged. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(4):380-388. doi:10.1002/gps.2350

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다