Telephone Calls for Health for Homebound Older Adults

March 26, 2021 updated by: Maninder Kahlon, University of Texas at Austin
A randomized controlled trial of the effect of 4 weeks of regular check-in calls, up to 5 per week based on participant's choice and 2 survey collection calls and possible referral of other services, versus no daily check-in calls, on self-reported loneliness measures for current Meals on Wheels participants (MOW).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The intervention arm will include 125 MOW clients to receive a call of between 5 - 10 minutes in length each by a consistent caller, five times a week, Monday through Friday for 4 consecutive weeks to check in on them. After the first week of calls, subjects in the intervention arm will be asked if the frequency of calls is acceptable or if they would like to reduce the call frequency, potentially to a minimum of twice per week.

Brief guidance and training will be provided for the daily conversation to maximize time spent speaking by the recipient but otherwise, the calls are unscripted other than specific prompts to ask about the recipient's general sense of well-being. "How are you doing today?"

The control Arm will include 125 MOW clients who will be randomized to a control group that will not receive the intervention calls. The control group will receive calls from a member of the research team at the beginning of the study to collect baseline survey data and at the post-4-week period to collect post-study survey data.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
        • University of Texas at Austin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (18+) clients of Meals on Wheels of Central Texas

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment or in a hospice program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention - Calls
Participants randomized to the intervention will receive a call of between 5 - 10 minutes in length each by a consistent caller, five times a week, Monday through Friday for 4 consecutive weeks to check in on them. After the first week of calls, subjects in the intervention arm will be asked if the frequency of calls is acceptable or if they would like to reduce the call frequency, potentially to a minimum of twice per week.
Calls were made by volunteers trained to engage with participants. Call structure was unscripted and call length was recommended to be between 5-10 min.
No Intervention: Control - No calls
Participants randomized to a control group will not receive the intervention calls. The control group will receive calls from a member of the research team at the beginning of the study to collect baseline survey data and at the post-4-week period to collect post-study survey data.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Loneliness as assessed by the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Investigators will use the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness 6-Item Scale for Overall, Emotional, and Social Loneliness. Scored from 0-6, a score of 0 indicates least lonely while a score of 6 indicates most lonely.
4 weeks
Loneliness as Assessed by the UCLA Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Investigators will use the UCLA Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys to measure loneliness. Scored from 3-9, higher scores indicate greater degrees of loneliness.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression as Assessed by the 8-item Depression Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Investigators will use the Depression Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) to measure depression. Scored from 0-3, and a score of 0 indicates lower levels of depression while a score of 3 indicates higher levels of depression.
4 weeks
Anxiety as Assessed by the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Investigators will use the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) to measure anxiety. Scored from 0-3, and a score of 0 indicates lower levels of anxiety while a score of 3 indicates higher levels of anxiety.
4 weeks
Health Status and Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form-12 Question Survey
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Investigators will use the Short Form-12 question survey to measure physical and mental health status. Summary scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better self-reported level of health.
4 weeks
Social Engagement as Assess by the Short Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Investigators will use the 6-item Short Lubben Social Network Scale to measure social engagement. For the LSNS-6, the score ranges between 0 and 30, with a higher score indicating more social engagement.
4 weeks
Empathy as Assessed by The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure
Time Frame: After the 4 week intervention (follow-up)
Investigators will use the CARE Measure to evaluate measures of empathy in the context of the caller/participant relationship
After the 4 week intervention (follow-up)
Toronto Empathy Questionnaire
Time Frame: Prior to the 4 week intervention (baseline)
The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire will be used to assess characteristics of callers that align with measures of ability to be empathetic.
Prior to the 4 week intervention (baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-05-0009

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Phone Call

3
Subscribe