Sexual violence in the lives of first-year university women in Canada: no improvements in the 21st century

Charlene Y Senn, Misha Eliasziw, Paula C Barata, Wilfreda E Thurston, Ian R Newby-Clark, H Lorraine Radtke, Karen L Hobden, SARE Study Team, Charlene Y Senn, Misha Eliasziw, Paula C Barata, Wilfreda E Thurston, Ian R Newby-Clark, H Lorraine Radtke, Karen L Hobden, SARE Study Team

Abstract

Background: Summarizes the frequency, type, and context of sexual assault in a large sample of first-year university women at three Canadian universities.

Methods: As part of a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of a sexual assault resistance education program, baseline data were collected from women between ages of 17 and 24 using computerized surveys. Participants' experience with sexual victimization since the age of 14 years was assessed using the Sexual Experiences Survey--Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV).

Results: Among 899 first-year university women (mean age = 18.5 years), 58.7% (95% CI: 55.4%, 62.0%) had experienced one or more forms of victimization since the age of 14 years, 35.0% (95% CI: 31.9%, 38.3%) had experienced at least one completed or attempted rape, and 23.5% (95% CI: 20.7%, 26.4%) had been raped. Among the 211 rape victims, 46.4% (95% CI: 39.7%, 53.2%) had experienced more than one type of assault (oral, vaginal, anal) in a single incident or across multiple incidents. More than three-quarters (79.6%; 95% CI: 74.2%, 85.1%) of the rapes occurred while women were incapacitated by alcohol or drugs. One-third (33.3%) of women had previous self-defence training, but few (4.0%) had previous sexual assault education.

Conclusions: Findings from the first large Canadian study of university women since the 1990s indicate that a large proportion of women arrive on campuses with histories of sexual victimization, and they are generally unprepared for the perpetrators they may face during their academic years. There is an urgent need for effective rape prevention programs on university campuses.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01338428. Registered 13 April 2011.

References

    1. Kimble M, Neacsiu AD, Flack WFJ, Horner J. Risk of unwanted sex for college women: evidence for a red zone. J Am Coll Heal. 2008;57(3):331–332. doi: 10.3200/JACH.57.3.331-338.
    1. Flack WFJ, Caron ML, Leinen SJ, Breitenbach KG, Barber AM, Brown EN, Gilbert CT, Harchak TF, Hendricks MM, Rector CE, Schatten HT, Stein HC. “The Red Zone”: temporal risk for unwanted sex among college students. J Interpers Violence. 2008;23(9):1177–1196. doi: 10.1177/0886260508314308.
    1. DeKeseredy W, Kelly K. The incidence and prevelance of women abuse in Canadian university and college dating relationships. Can J Sociol. 1993;18(2):137–159. doi: 10.2307/3341255.
    1. Koss MP, Gidycz CA, Wisniewski N. The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55(2):162–170. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162.
    1. Fisher B, Cullen F, Turner M. The Sexual Victimization of College Women: Findings from Two National-Level Studies. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2000.
    1. Koss MP, Heise L, Russo NF. The global health burden of rape. Psychol Women Q. 1994;18(4):509–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01046.x.
    1. Martin SL, Macy RJ, Young SK. Health and economic consequences of sexual violence. In: White MPK JW, Kazdin AE, editors. Violence Against Women and Children: Mapping the Terrain. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2011. pp. 173–195.
    1. Violence Against Women Act of 1994. In Session 42 U.S.C, Sect. 40001–40703.
    1. White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault: Not Alone. In 2014. : United States Government.
    1. Carr JL: American College Health Association Campus Violence White Paper. In Baltimore, MD: American College Health Association; 2005. .
    1. Ullman SE. Talking About Sexual Assault: Society’s Response to Survivors. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2010.
    1. Developing a response to sexual violence: a resource guide for Ontario's Colleges and Universities. In : Ontario Women's Directorate / Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities.
    1. Canadian Federation of Students -- Ontario: Campus toolkit for combatting sexual violence. In 2013. : Canadian Federation of Students.
    1. Brennan S, Taylor-Butts A: Sexual assault in Canada: 2004 and 2007. In Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics; 2008. .
    1. Sinha M: Measuring violence against women: statistical trends 2013. In Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2013. .
    1. Newton-Taylor B, DeWit D, Gliksman L. Prevalence and factors associated with physical and sexual assault of female university students in Ontario. Health Care Women Int. 1998;19(2):155–164. doi: 10.1080/073993398246485.
    1. Senn CY, Eliasziw M, Barata PC, Thurston WE, Newby-Clark IR, Radtke HL, Hobden KL. Sexual assault resistance education for university women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (SARE trial) BMC Women's Health. 2013;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-25.
    1. Jarvis BG. MediaLab. New York, NY: Empirisoft Corporation; 2010.
    1. Gray MD, Lesser D, Quinn E, Brounds C. The effectiveness of personalizing acquaintance rape prevention: programs on perception of vulnerability and on reducing risk-taking behavior. J Coll Stud Dev. 1990;31:217–220.
    1. Koss MP, Abbey A, Campbell R, Cook S, Norris J, Testa M, Ullman SE, West C, White J. Revising the SES: a collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychol Women Q. 2007;31:237–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x.
    1. Koss MP, Gidycz CA. Sexual experiences survey: reliability and validity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53(3):422–423. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.422.
    1. Koss MP, Oros CJ. Sexual experiences survey: a research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982;50(3):455–457. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.50.3.455.
    1. Gidycz CA. Sexual revictimization revisited: a commentary. Psychol Women Q. 2011;35(2):355–361. doi: 10.1177/0361684311404111.
    1. Classen CC, Palesh OG, Aggarwal R. Sexual revictimization: a review of the empirical literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2005;6(2):103–129. doi: 10.1177/1524838005275087.
    1. Brecklin LR. Evaluation outcomes of self-defense training for women: a review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2008;13(1):60–76. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2007.10.001.
    1. Rozee PD, Koss MP. Rape: a century of resistance. Psychol Women Q. 2001;25:295–311. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00030.
    1. Nurius PS. Women's perception of risk for acquaintance sexual assault: a social cognitive assessment. Aggress Violent Behav. 2000;5(1):63–78. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00003-2.
    1. Abbey A. Alcohol-related sexual assault: a common problem among college students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2002;14:118–128.
    1. Ullman SE. A critical review of field studies on the link of alcohol and adult sexual assault in women. Aggress Violent Behav. 2003;8(5):471–486. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(03)00032-6.
    1. Gidycz CA, McNamara JR, Edwards KM. Women’s risk perception and sexual victimization: a review of the literature. Aggression Violent Behav. 2006;11:441–456. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.01.004.
    1. Tjaden P, Thoennes N: Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. In U.S: Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs; 2000. .
    1. Hanson KA, Gidycz CA. Evaluation of a sexual assault prevention program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(6):1046–1052. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.61.6.1046.
    1. Gidycz CA, Lynn SJ, Rich CL, Marioni NL, Loh C, Blackwell LM, Stafford J, Fite R, Pashdag J. The evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction program: a multisite investigation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(6):1073–1078. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.6.1073.
    1. Elliott DE, Bjelajac P, Fallot RD, Markoff LS, Reed BG. Trauma‐informed or trauma‐denied: principles and implementation of trauma‐informed services for women. J Community Psychol. 2005;33(4):461–477. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20063.
    1. Perilloux C, Duntley JD, Buss DM. The costs of rape. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(5):1099–1106. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9863-9.
    1. Lonsway KA, Banyard VL, Berkowitz AD, Gidycz CA, Katz JT, Koss MP, Schewe PA, Ullman SE: Rape prevention and risk reduction: Review of the research literature for practitioners. In VAWnet: The national online resource center on violence against women 2009, January:1–20.
    1. Tharp AT, DeGue S, Lang K, Valle LA, Massetti G, Holt M, Matjasko J. Commentary on Foubert, Godin, & Tatum (2010): the evolution of sexual violence prevention and the urgency of effectiveness. J Interpers Violence. 2011;26(16):3383–3392. doi: 10.1177/0886260510393010.
    1. Schewe PA. Guidelines for developing rape prevention and risk reduction interventions. In: Schewe PA, editor. Preventing Violence in Relationships. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2002. pp. 107–136.
    1. Moynihan MM, Banyard VL, Cares AC, Potter SJ, Williams LM, Stapleton JG. Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: what program effects remain 1 year later? J Interpers Violence. 2014;online first:1–23.
    1. Jozkowski KN, Peterson ZD. College students and sexual consent: unique insights. J Sex Res. 2012;50(6):517–523. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.700739.
    1. Weisz AN, Black BM. Evaluating a sexual assault and dating violence prevention program for urban youths. Soc Work Res. 2001;25(2):89–100. doi: 10.1093/swr/25.2.89.
    1. Saunders DM, Fisher WA, Hewitt EC, Clayton JP. A method for empirically assessing volunteer selection effects: recruitment procedures and responses to erotica. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;49(6):1703–1712. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1703.
    1. Stevens L: Screening for sexual violence: gaps in research and recommendations for change. In VAWnet: a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition against Domestic Violence; 2007, December.
    1. Gavey NJ, Senn CY. Sexual violence and sexuality. In: Tolman DL, Diamond L, editors. Handbook on Sexuality and Psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2013. pp. 339–382.
    1. Gidycz CA, Dardis CM. Feminist self-defense and resistance training for college students: a critical review and recommendations for the future. Trauma, Violence & Abuse. 2014;15(4):322–333. doi: 10.1177/1524838014521026.
    1. Senn CY, Gee SS, Thake J. Emancipatory sexuality education and sexual assault resistance: does the former enhance the latter? Psychol Women Q. 2011;35(1):72–91. doi: 10.1177/0361684310384101.
    1. Hollander JA. Does self-defense training prevent sexual violence against women? Violence Against Women. 2014;20(3):252–269. doi: 10.1177/1077801214526046.
    1. Senn CY, Forrest A. Using social psychology to make a university campus a safer place. Psynopsis. 2013;35(1):61–62.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다