- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01338428
Sexual Assault Resistance Education for University Women
Sexual Assault Resistance Education for University Women: A Trial in Three Canadian Universities
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Violence against women costs Canadians at least $1.5 billion each year in health related expenses (Day, 1995). The associated physical and mental health effects are extensive and the social and economic costs are staggering. The aim of this project is to reduce a very common form of violence against women, sexual assault, at Canadian universities. At least 1 in 6 women will experience an attempted or completed rape in their lifetimes (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000). The situation on university campuses is even more startling with as many as 1 in 4 women experiencing rape or attempted rape while enrolled in university (Fisher, Cullen, & Turner, 2000). Reductions in sexual assault will have a direct impact on the mental and physical health of university women.
The proposed trial builds on the Principal Investigator's CIHR-funded research which developed, revised, and then tested the basic sexual assault resistance program against a non-random control. It also builds on the Ontario Women's Health Council funded RCT which evaluated the basic program against an enhanced version, and a no-program control. Our pilot work (N=214) revealed that women who had the program experienced lower rates of completed sexual assault (40 - 50% lower) at 3 and 6 months than women who did not. The program also produced measurable improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and skills related to sexual assault resistance and to better recovery following sexual assault. This testing was within one university setting and with only short-term (1 week,3 and 6 month post) follow-up. This RCT extends this evaluation by expanding the participant population and examining the longer term efficacy of the program. First year female students from three Canadian universities will be randomized to receive our education program or to be part of a current practice exposure condition. Outcome measures will be completed at baseline, 1 week, 6, 12 months.
The four session sexual assault resistance program under study is based on the best theories and evidence available.Three of the four sessions address steps in a woman's emotional and cognitive processes as they relate to male acquaintances who are acting in a way that makes sexual coercion or sexual assault more likely. The units provide information, skills, and practice aimed at a) decreasing the time needed for women to assess the situation as dangerous and take action, b) reducing emotional obstacles to taking action, and c) increasing the use of the most effective methods of verbal and physical self-defense. The enhanced program piloted in the OWHC project includes a fourth unit which focuses on facilitating a stronger positive sexuality from which women may resist sexual coercion by male intimates more successfully.
The primary objective of this study is to establish whether a novel, small-group education program can reduce the one-year incidence of sexual assault by 30% (absolute difference of 7.5%). The secondary objectives are to assess whether changes in knowledge, attitudes, and skills related to the process of sexual assault resistance are improved in the short term, and, along with the primary outcome, maintained for the longer term. The tertiary objective is to assess whether the education program can also reduce the one-year incidence of forced sexual contact and sexual coercion.
The results of the trial will be used either to: (a) produce a maximally effective rape resistance education program package which can be adopted by universities across Canada or; (b) provide direction for further research into which aspects of the program need to be strengthened before such broad dissemination. The results will also be used to indicate how long the effects of the program last and will indicate at which point in time refresher sessions may be necessary.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4Z6
- University of Calgary
-
-
Ontario
-
Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1
- University of Guelph
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- female subjects, aged 18 to 24 years;
- first-year university student;
- provide informed consent;
- able to attend one of four scheduled programs in the semester they are enrolled.
Exclusion Criteria:
None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Brochure
|
Current 'standard of care' at Canadian universities.
Invitation to take and read brochures on sexual assault selected from those available on their Canadian university campus.
All sites' brochures include general information on sexual assault and 'date-rape' drugs and post-rape legal and medical advice.
The research assistant (RA) will ask the participants to take brochures, read them over, and to ask any questions they may have.
Questions will be answered in a group setting and the participant will take home any brochures that she selected.
Interaction between participants and the RA on the topic will be limited to 10-15 minutes and will be audio recorded for verification.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Enhanced AAA Sexual Assault Education
|
Resistance Program: 4x3-hour units.
Unit 1 (Assess) accurate assessment of sexual assault risk.
Provides: empirically-based information on situational and (male) behavioural danger cues; practice identifying risk and counteracting it.
Unit 2 'Acknowledge[ment]' of risk when present.
Includes: women's sexual rights; emotional barriers; tactics used by coercive men; practice.
Unit 3 (Act) includes: assessing whether or not an escape is possible; research evidence on the effectiveness of resistance strategies; physical self-defense training.
Unit 4 applies content to longer term relationships covering: comfort talking about sexuality, identification of sexual values, practices beyond intercourse, and articulation of relationship goals.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time-to-event occurrence of completed sexual assault in one year since randomization
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Completed sexual assault (rape) will have occurred when a participant indicates she has had at least one experience of threatened, forced, or drugged completed (not attempted) sexual activity (oral, anal, or vaginal intercourse - answered 'once' or more to any of 9 questions (2c, 2d, 2e, 3c, 3d, 3e, 4c, 4d, or 4e) in the period between the baseline measurement and the current day (Sexual Experiences Survey Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV)(Koss et al., 2007)
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline in perception of risk of sexual assault by male acquaintances and maintenance to 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 6 and 12 months
|
Measured by one item ("What are your chances of being raped by someone you know?") adapted from Gray et al., (1990) and piloted extensively by Senn.
|
baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 6 and 12 months
|
Change from baseline in women's perception of their ability to defend themselves if a sexual assault situation were to arise and maintenance at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: baseline, 1 week and 6 and 12 months post-intervention
|
Self-defense self-efficacy: Ozer & Bandura, 1990
|
baseline, 1 week and 6 and 12 months post-intervention
|
Knowledge of effective rape resistance strategies
Time Frame: 1 week post-intervention
|
number of forceful physical and forceful verbal strategies in response to threatening hypothetical situations (Resistance measure, Testa et al., 2006; qualitative items by Senn) and real situations (items requesting details following sexual assaults experienced, questions added to SES items, Hanson & Gidycz, 1993).
|
1 week post-intervention
|
Ability to realistically assess risk of harm in hypothetical scenarios where acquaintance sexual assault is likely
Time Frame: 1 week post-intervention
|
A) Risk perception questionnaire (Testa et al., 2006).
B) Risk Perception Survey (RPS) (Messman-Moore & Brown, 2006)
|
1 week post-intervention
|
Change from baseline in beliefs and attitudes about rape
Time Frame: baseline, 1 week, 6 and 12 months post-intervention
|
Indicated by endorsement of rape myths (Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (IRMA-SF), Payne, et al., 1999) and misinformation about the causes of rape (Perceived Causes of Rape Scale (PCOR), Cowan & Campbell, 1995; revised Cowan & Quinton, 1997); focus on Female Precipitation subscale.
|
baseline, 1 week, 6 and 12 months post-intervention
|
Time-to-event occurrence of forced sexual contact and/or sexual coercion in one year since randomization
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Using the SES-SFV, forced sexual contact will have occurred when a participant indicates she has had an experience of threatened, forced, or drug facilitated sexual touch not including intercourse - answered 'once' or more to any of 3 questions (1c, 1d, or 1e).
Sexual coercion will have occurred when a participant reports one or more incidents of verbally coerced (excluding threats of physical harm) non-consensual oral, vaginal, or anal intercourse - answered 'once' or more to any of 6 questions (2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4a, or 4b) in the period between the baseline measurement and the current day.
|
12 months
|
Maintenance of improved knowledge of effective rape resistance strategies
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of forceful physical and forceful verbal strategies in response to threatening hypothetical situations (Resistance measure, Testa et al., 2006; qualitative items by Senn) and real situations (items requesting details following sexual assaults experienced, questions added to SES items, Hanson & Gidycz, 1993).
|
12 months
|
Maintenance of ability to realistically assess risk of harm in hypothetical scenarios where acquaintance sexual assault is likely
Time Frame: 12 months
|
A) Risk perception questionnaire (Testa et al., 2006).
B) Risk Perception Survey (RPS) (Messman-Moore & Brown, 2006)
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Charlene Y Senn, PhD, University of Windsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hanson KA, Gidycz CA. Evaluation of a sexual assault prevention program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Dec;61(6):1046-52. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.6.1046.
- Ozer EM, Bandura A. Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: a self-efficacy analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Mar;58(3):472-86. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.3.472.
- Senn CY, Gee S & Thake J. Emancipatory sexuality education and sexual assault resistance: Does the former enhance the latter? Psychology of Women Quarterly 35(1): 72-91, 2011.
- Day, T. (1995). The Health-Related Costs of Violence against Women in Canada: The Tip of the Iceberg. London, On.: The Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children, 1995.
- Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, 2000.
- Fisher B, Cullen F, Turner M. The Sexual Victimization of College Women: Findings From Two National-Level Studies. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2000.
- Koss MP, Abbey A, Campbell R, Cook S, Norris J, Testa M. et al. Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357-370, 2007.
- Gray DM, Lesser D, Quinn E, Brounds C. The effectiveness of personalizing acquaintance rape prevention: Programs on perception of vulnerability and on reducing risk-taking behavior. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 217-220, 1990.
- Testa M, Vanzile-Tamsen C, Livingston JA, Buddie AM. The role of women's alcohol consumption in managing sexual intimacy and sexual safety motives. J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Sep;67(5):665-74. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.665.
- Messman-Moore TL, Brown AL. Risk perception, rape and sexual revictimization: A prospective study of college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 159-172, 2006.
- Payne DL, Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF. Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68, 1999.
- Cowan G, Campbell RR. Rape causal attitudes among adolescents. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 145-153, 1995.
- Cowan G, Quinton WJ. Cognitive style and attitudinal correlates of the perceived causes of rape scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 227-245, 1997.
- Hobden KL, Thurston WE, McVey GL, Senn CY. An Evaluation of Strategies Used to Maximize Intervention Fidelity in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Sexual Assault Resistance Program for University Women. Prev Sci. 2021 Oct;22(7):960-970. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01239-2. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
- Senn CY, Eliasziw M, Barata PC, Thurston WE, Newby-Clark IR, Radtke HL, Hobden KL. Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2326-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1411131.
- Senn CY, Eliasziw M, Barata PC, Thurston WE, Newby-Clark IR, Radtke HL, Hobden KL; SARE Study Team. Sexual violence in the lives of first-year university women in Canada: no improvements in the 21st century. BMC Womens Health. 2014 Nov 5;14:135. doi: 10.1186/s12905-014-0135-4.
- Senn CY, Eliasziw M, Barata PC, Thurston WE, Newby-Clark IR, Radtke HL, Hobden KL; SARE study team. Sexual assault resistance education for university women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (SARE trial). BMC Womens Health. 2013 May 23;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-25.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- MOP-110976
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sexual Assault
-
University of Nebraska LincolnUniversity of NebraskaCompletedSexual AssaultUnited States
-
Happy People Games, LLCClemson UniversityCompletedSexual AssaultUnited States
-
University of PittsburghCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedViolence | Sexual AssaultUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierNot yet recruiting
-
University of MichiganTufts University; University of Guelph; University of Nebraska; University of WindsorRecruitingSexual AssaultUnited States, Canada
-
University of WindsorPublic Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)RecruitingSexual AssaultCanada
-
University of MichiganCompletedSexual AssaultUnited States
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
Mary KossArizona State University; Arizona Department of Health ServicesRecruitingSexual Assault Precursor BehaviorUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...United States Department of DefenseNot yet recruitingSexual Assault | Sexual HarassmentUnited States
Clinical Trials on Brochure
-
Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante)...Active, not recruiting
-
Fox Chase Cancer CenterKnowledge NetworksCompleted
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterCompletedChemotherapy Effect | Chemotherapeutic Toxicity | Chemotherapeutic Agent ToxicityUnited States
-
Selcuk UniversityCompleted
-
IRCSS Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Fondazione...Ministry of Health, Italy; Centro di Eccellenza per la Cultura e la Ricerca...Completed
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiTerminated
-
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip FakultesiCompletedPatient Education | Nursing CareTurkey
-
University Health Network, TorontoEnrolling by invitationParkinson Disease | Dementia | Alzheimer Disease | Vascular Dementia | Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration | Neuro-Degenerative Disease | Caregiver BurnoutCanada
-
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention...The Info Trial Group; Charlotte Behnke; Pia Caspersen; Dorte Fischer; Rolf I. Hansen and other collaboratorsCompletedAmbulatory Patients in the Dep. of Medical Gastroenterology | Ambulatory Patients in the Dep. of Gynecology | Ambulatory Patients in the Dep. of Orthopedic Surgery | Ambulatory Patients in the Dep. of UrologyDenmark