Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Capsule Endoscopy vs. Push Enteroscopy in Occult Gastrointestinal Bleeding OGIB

23. mars 2007 oppdatert av: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Efficiency of Capsule Endoscopy and Push Enteroscopy in Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding. A Prospective Randomized Study.

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a safe and effective tool for the assessment of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). However, its real efficacy and its position in the diagnostic algorithm of OGIB vs. push enteroscopy (PE) remain unknown since in previous studies both techniques were performed in all included patients The purpose of this protocol is to conduct a randomized prospective controlled trial in patients with OGIB comparing a strategy based on CE or PE followed by the alternative exploration only when the first line exploration was negative. The main outpoint of this study concerns the diagnostic yield of the two explorations. Second endpoint concerns the clinical relevance of the two strategies tested (CE ± PE vs. CE ± PE) in terms of diagnostic yield, clinical outcome, therapeutic impact and added explorations

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Detaljert beskrivelse

This was a prospective randomized multicentric study. After the screening visit, eligible subjects were randomly assigned to be explored by CE or PE (first line exploration). The alternative exploration was only performed if no diagnosis was evidenced by the examination assigned by randomization. An independent staff member assigned subjects in 1:1 ratio between CE and PE strategies with stratification for overt and occult bleeding and centers according to consecutive number that were kept in serialized sealed opaque envelopes. After the completion of these explorations, the patients returned at month 3, 6 and 12 thereafter. At each visit, clinical evaluation and laboratory tests were performed and patients were managed according to published recommendations2 (AGA medical position). The first line exploration as well as the alternative exploration could be done during the one year follow-up period only in case of severe relapse of OGIB or necessity to perform biopsies or a therapeutic procedure.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering

45

Fase

  • Fase 3

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

      • Paris, Frankrike, 75015
        • Hôpital Europeén Georges Pompidou

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients may suffer from episodes of active bleeding within the last 6 months or chronic iron-deficiency anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dl).
  • A gynecologic or proctologic bleeding source had to be excluded.
  • All patients had to have negative workup including upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, colonoscopy and small-bowel barium series or computed tomography enteroclysis.
  • Medical reports and/or the imaging documents were available and reviewed in all patients. Usually these investigations were repeated several times before inclusion.
  • Abdominal angiography was only performed when there were signs of active bleeding during the diagnostic work-up (n = 3). Meckel scintigraphy was usually carried out in patients under 30 years of age (n = 14).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient presenting a digestive bleeding with an echo hemodynamic major and\or requiring urgent therapeutic measures
  • Wait presenting a gynaecological cause or a cause proctology of sure imputability or syndrome of malabsorption or deficiency of contribution not formally excluded
  • Patient presenting an occlusive syndrome or a hurt of stenosis hail objectivized by a radiological exploration
  • Surrounding wall(Speaker) or in age waits to procreate without effective contraception
  • The mental or physical state of the patient not allowing a maid compliance in the conditions of the try(essay) and or in the correct use of the device Patient carrier of a pacemaker or another electromechanical implant
  • Patient that must undergo an examination by MRI before having been able to eliminate the capsule
  • Enteroscopy or video capsule prerequisite technically satisfactory and in touch with same pathological episode or dating at least less than 6 months Patient participating at present in another clinical trial without direct profit which can directly or indirectly influence the results(profits) of the present study

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Diagnostisk
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
The primary end point was the diagnostic yield of CE and PE (first line exploration allocated by randomization) for the identification of a definitive source of bleeding.

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Secondary end points were evaluated at the end of the follow up period and concerned the clinical relevance of the two strategies (PE ± CE vs. CE ± PE). They included: (1) the diagnostic yield of the two strategies for the identification of a definitive

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Raymond JIAN, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. mars 2002

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. juni 2005

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

16. september 2005

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

16. september 2005

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

23. september 2005

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)

26. mars 2007

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

23. mars 2007

Sist bekreftet

1. mars 2007

Mer informasjon

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere