Using Values to Enhance Inmates' Response to Substance Use and HIV Risk Feedback
6. august 2019 oppdatert av: June Tangney, George Mason University
A key component of effective offender treatment is an initial assessment of risk factors followed by feedback to facilitate problem awareness and engagement in appropriate treatment and/or behavior change. Feedback regarding areas of high risk, however, can be experienced as threatening.
The investigators propose to develop, fine-tune, and pilot-test a computerized system for risk assessment and feedback, including evaluation of a brief pre-feedback prosocial values affirmation exercise (Cohen & Sherman, 2014) aimed at decreasing defensiveness and increasing inmates' willingness to access and process risk-relevant information and to utilize post-release treatment resources, thereby reducing post-release substance misuse, HIV risk behavior, and criminal recidivism. Participants will be 170 jail inmates nearing release into the community - 20 pilot participants and 150 study participants randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) Values Affirmation + Personalized Risk Feedback; (2) Personalized Risk Feedback only; (3) Control. The baseline and risk assessment, values affirmation manipulation, and personalized risk feedback will be presented via touch-screen computers, requiring minimal training to administer. Analyses will assess:
- The feasibility of utilizing a computerized system to assess and share risk information with jail inmates, including a brief values affirmation exercise to reduce defensiveness;
- The acceptability of this approach from the perspectives of jail staff and inmates themselves;
- The impact of the intervention on observed proximal outcomes (mechanisms of action), such as time spent viewing feedback, electing to print a copy of informational and treatment resources, and consequent changes in perceptions of risk, treatability, etc.;
- The impact of the intervention on key post-release outcomes including engagement in relevant treatment services, substance misuse, HIV risk behaviors, re-offense and re-arrest;
- The links between proximal outcomes (MOAs) and key post-release outcomes;
- Potential moderators of treatment effectiveness.
Studieoversikt
Status
Ukjent
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Forventet)
150
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sufficient proficiency in spoken English to understand computer-assisted assessments and feedback
- post-sentencing with a sentence (i.e., less than 12 months) likely to be served out at the jail (vs. a state or federal prison) and likely to be released into the community. The invitation to participate will be timed so treatment is delivered toward the end of incarceration (within one week of release) to minimize decay of effects, and to capitalize on the motivational value of the up-coming release.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those with detainers to other jurisdictions and to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Faktoriell oppgave
- Masking: Firemannsrom
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Values Affirmation plus Risk Feedback
Values Affirmation with Risk Feedback in substance use and HIV domains of risk
|
Experimental Group selects two values and describes why they are important
Experimental and comparator conditions both receive normative feedback in domains of risk
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Risk Feedback
Sham Values Affirmation with Risk Feedback in substance use and HIV domains of risk
|
Experimental and comparator conditions both receive normative feedback in domains of risk
|
|
Ingen inngripen: Sleep Control
Description of sleep habits in lieu of values affirmation/sham values affirmation.
No risk feedback
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in substance use
Tidsramme: 3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Changes in substance use -- among those who were identified at risk and who thus received feedback, pre-post incarceration changes in terms of pre-incarceration standard deviations.
If more than one domain of feedback, average standard deviation change.
|
3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
|
Changes in HIV risk behavior
Tidsramme: 3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Changes in HIV risk behavior -- among those who were identified at risk and who thus received feedback, pre-post incarceration changes in terms of pre-incarceration standard deviations.
If more than one domain of feedback (risky sex, risky needle use), average standard deviation change.
|
3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in accuracy of perceptions of normative risk behavior
Tidsramme: Immediately following intervention (Time 1)
|
Changes in accuracy of perceptions of normative behavior (pre-post intervention changes in terms of pre-intervention standard deviations) in areas of risk/feedback
|
Immediately following intervention (Time 1)
|
|
Requests Community Resources
Tidsramme: Immediately following intervention (Time 1)
|
Choose to print a copy of community resources in domain(s) of risk
|
Immediately following intervention (Time 1)
|
|
Makes Use of Community Resources
Tidsramme: 3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Makes use of relevant community services during 3 months post-release
|
3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: June P Tangney, PhD, George Mason University
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Forventet)
27. august 2019
Primær fullføring (Forventet)
1. april 2020
Studiet fullført (Forventet)
1. august 2020
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
27. mars 2018
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
10. april 2018
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
18. april 2018
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
8. august 2019
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
6. august 2019
Sist bekreftet
1. august 2019
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- R34DA042974-01 (U.S. NIH-stipend/kontrakt)
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
JA
IPD-planbeskrivelse
We will make the data and associated documentation available to researchers under a data-sharing agreement that provides for: (1) release of individually prepared datasets containing the subset of variables required to answer the requester's research question(s); (2) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to attempt to identify any individual participant; (3) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology housed in a secure laboratory facility; and (4) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.
Because of the exceptionally sensitive nature of the data, detailed criminal history and re-arrest information and self-reports of undetected criminal behavior will not be shared.
Data requests will be accepted beginning 12 months after publication of the primary findings of the proposed project.
IPD-delingstidsramme
Beginning 12 months after publication of the primary findings of the proposed project, for 5 years.
Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling
Researchers who commit to using the data only for research purposes and not to attempt to identify any individual participant; who commit to securing the data using appropriate computer technology housed in a secure laboratory facility; and who commit to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.
IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SEVJE
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .