Using Values to Enhance Inmates' Response to Substance Use and HIV Risk Feedback
6 de agosto de 2019 actualizado por: June Tangney, George Mason University
A key component of effective offender treatment is an initial assessment of risk factors followed by feedback to facilitate problem awareness and engagement in appropriate treatment and/or behavior change. Feedback regarding areas of high risk, however, can be experienced as threatening.
The investigators propose to develop, fine-tune, and pilot-test a computerized system for risk assessment and feedback, including evaluation of a brief pre-feedback prosocial values affirmation exercise (Cohen & Sherman, 2014) aimed at decreasing defensiveness and increasing inmates' willingness to access and process risk-relevant information and to utilize post-release treatment resources, thereby reducing post-release substance misuse, HIV risk behavior, and criminal recidivism. Participants will be 170 jail inmates nearing release into the community - 20 pilot participants and 150 study participants randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) Values Affirmation + Personalized Risk Feedback; (2) Personalized Risk Feedback only; (3) Control. The baseline and risk assessment, values affirmation manipulation, and personalized risk feedback will be presented via touch-screen computers, requiring minimal training to administer. Analyses will assess:
- The feasibility of utilizing a computerized system to assess and share risk information with jail inmates, including a brief values affirmation exercise to reduce defensiveness;
- The acceptability of this approach from the perspectives of jail staff and inmates themselves;
- The impact of the intervention on observed proximal outcomes (mechanisms of action), such as time spent viewing feedback, electing to print a copy of informational and treatment resources, and consequent changes in perceptions of risk, treatability, etc.;
- The impact of the intervention on key post-release outcomes including engagement in relevant treatment services, substance misuse, HIV risk behaviors, re-offense and re-arrest;
- The links between proximal outcomes (MOAs) and key post-release outcomes;
- Potential moderators of treatment effectiveness.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Desconocido
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Anticipado)
150
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Todos
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sufficient proficiency in spoken English to understand computer-assisted assessments and feedback
- post-sentencing with a sentence (i.e., less than 12 months) likely to be served out at the jail (vs. a state or federal prison) and likely to be released into the community. The invitation to participate will be timed so treatment is delivered toward the end of incarceration (within one week of release) to minimize decay of effects, and to capitalize on the motivational value of the up-coming release.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those with detainers to other jurisdictions and to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación factorial
- Enmascaramiento: Cuadruplicar
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Values Affirmation plus Risk Feedback
Values Affirmation with Risk Feedback in substance use and HIV domains of risk
|
Experimental Group selects two values and describes why they are important
Experimental and comparator conditions both receive normative feedback in domains of risk
|
|
Comparador activo: Risk Feedback
Sham Values Affirmation with Risk Feedback in substance use and HIV domains of risk
|
Experimental and comparator conditions both receive normative feedback in domains of risk
|
|
Sin intervención: Sleep Control
Description of sleep habits in lieu of values affirmation/sham values affirmation.
No risk feedback
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in substance use
Periodo de tiempo: 3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Changes in substance use -- among those who were identified at risk and who thus received feedback, pre-post incarceration changes in terms of pre-incarceration standard deviations.
If more than one domain of feedback, average standard deviation change.
|
3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
|
Changes in HIV risk behavior
Periodo de tiempo: 3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Changes in HIV risk behavior -- among those who were identified at risk and who thus received feedback, pre-post incarceration changes in terms of pre-incarceration standard deviations.
If more than one domain of feedback (risky sex, risky needle use), average standard deviation change.
|
3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in accuracy of perceptions of normative risk behavior
Periodo de tiempo: Immediately following intervention (Time 1)
|
Changes in accuracy of perceptions of normative behavior (pre-post intervention changes in terms of pre-intervention standard deviations) in areas of risk/feedback
|
Immediately following intervention (Time 1)
|
|
Requests Community Resources
Periodo de tiempo: Immediately following intervention (Time 1)
|
Choose to print a copy of community resources in domain(s) of risk
|
Immediately following intervention (Time 1)
|
|
Makes Use of Community Resources
Periodo de tiempo: 3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Makes use of relevant community services during 3 months post-release
|
3 months post-release (Time 2)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: June P Tangney, PhD, George Mason University
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Anticipado)
27 de agosto de 2019
Finalización primaria (Anticipado)
1 de abril de 2020
Finalización del estudio (Anticipado)
1 de agosto de 2020
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
27 de marzo de 2018
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
10 de abril de 2018
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
18 de abril de 2018
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
8 de agosto de 2019
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
6 de agosto de 2019
Última verificación
1 de agosto de 2019
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- R34DA042974-01 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
SÍ
Descripción del plan IPD
We will make the data and associated documentation available to researchers under a data-sharing agreement that provides for: (1) release of individually prepared datasets containing the subset of variables required to answer the requester's research question(s); (2) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to attempt to identify any individual participant; (3) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology housed in a secure laboratory facility; and (4) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.
Because of the exceptionally sensitive nature of the data, detailed criminal history and re-arrest information and self-reports of undetected criminal behavior will not be shared.
Data requests will be accepted beginning 12 months after publication of the primary findings of the proposed project.
Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD
Beginning 12 months after publication of the primary findings of the proposed project, for 5 years.
Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD
Researchers who commit to using the data only for research purposes and not to attempt to identify any individual participant; who commit to securing the data using appropriate computer technology housed in a secure laboratory facility; and who commit to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.
Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
- SAVIA
- CIF
- CÓDIGO_ANALÍTICO
- RSC
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .