Table Height Effects on Spinal Success by Residents in Indonesia
Effects of Operating Table Height on Subarachnoid Block Success by Anesthesia Residents in Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia
Operating table height influences operator comfort and performance during neuraxial anaesthesia, particularly when the patient is positioned sitting. This study aimed to analyse the effect of operating table height on the success rate and incidence of complications during spinal anesthesia, particularly done by trainees/residents.
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
Patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not meet any exclusion criteria were randomised by computer software into two groups according to operating table height - set with puncture site at the level of the operator's umbilicus or the operator's xiphoid process - with group allocation concealed in opaque envelopes. Operators were enrolled by consecutive sampling, consisting of anaesthesiology residents who met the eligibility criteria and were present in the operating theatre during the study period. The outcomes assessed included subarachnoid block success, procedural duration from needle insertion to free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, the need for needle redirection, the need for needle reinsertion, operator comfort, operator posture analysis, and minor complications such as paresthesia or vascular puncture
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
Jakarta Special Capital Region
-
Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta Special Capital Region, Indonesia, 10430
- Universitas Indonesia
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- adult patients aged 18-65 years scheduled for elective surgery under neuraxial subarachnoid block anaesthesia
- classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- operator had performed fewer than 39 prior subarachnoid blocks
Exclusion Criteria:
- body mass index >30 kg/m²
- contraindications to subarachnoid block
- patients' inability to be positioned sitting in accordance with the study protocol
- unwillingness to participate
- operator being unable to perform subarachnoid block according to protocol (injuries etc)
- table height being unable to be adjusted to the target level
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Støttende omsorg
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Umbilicus
Patients with table height set so that the puncture site is at operators' umbilicus level |
Table height set so that the puncture site is at operators' umbilicus or xyphoid process level |
|
Eksperimentell: Xyphoid process
Patients with table height set so that puncture site is at the operators' xyphoid process level |
Table height set so that the puncture site is at operators' umbilicus or xyphoid process level |
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Procedure sucess
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Determined as free flowing cerebrospinal fluid in spinal needle hub with total procedure time less than 10 minutes, redirection less than 5 minutes, and reinsertion less than 3 times, without occurrence of paresthesia and bloody tao |
Periprocedural
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to sucess
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Time needed from spinal needle-skin contact to free flow of cerebrospinal fluid |
Periprocedural
|
|
Redirection
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Numbers of needle redirection needed at the same puncture site |
Periprocedural
|
|
Reinsertion
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Numbers of spinal needle insertion (after fully pulled out from the skin) |
Periprocedural
|
|
Paresthesia
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Abnormal unpleasant sensation (tingling, burning electric shock, or pain) on lower limbs during spinal procedure |
Periprocedural
|
|
Blood contamination
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Blood observed in spinal needle hub that went away after needle redirection |
Periprocedural
|
|
Bloody tap
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Aspirated blood in spinal needle hub that persists even after needle redirection and necessitate a reinsertion |
Periprocedural
|
|
Subjective comfort assessment
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Subjective assessment of perceived comfort during procedure, asked simply as "comfortable" or "uncomfortable" |
Periprocedural
|
|
Musculoskeletal complaints
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Perceived sensation of aches, pains, tiredness, or stiffness in certain body areas as measured by nordic body map. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 28. Higher scores mean worse outcome. |
Periprocedural
|
|
Body postures score
Tidsramme: Periprocedural
|
Assessment of forced posture risk scoring using Rapid Entire Body Assessment. Minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 15. Higher scores mean worse outcome. |
Periprocedural
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Rahendra Rahendra, MD, Universitas Indonesia
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Generelle publikasjoner
- ijerph19010595
Hjelpsomme linker
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 25-08-1204
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
All IPD collected during trial
IPD-delingstidsramme
Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results
Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling
De-identified participant data supporting the results reported in this article will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal via email. A data sharing agreement should be signed.
IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
- CSR
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .