Table Height Effects on Spinal Success by Residents in Indonesia
Effects of Operating Table Height on Subarachnoid Block Success by Anesthesia Residents in Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia
Operating table height influences operator comfort and performance during neuraxial anaesthesia, particularly when the patient is positioned sitting. This study aimed to analyse the effect of operating table height on the success rate and incidence of complications during spinal anesthesia, particularly done by trainees/residents.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not meet any exclusion criteria were randomised by computer software into two groups according to operating table height - set with puncture site at the level of the operator's umbilicus or the operator's xiphoid process - with group allocation concealed in opaque envelopes. Operators were enrolled by consecutive sampling, consisting of anaesthesiology residents who met the eligibility criteria and were present in the operating theatre during the study period. The outcomes assessed included subarachnoid block success, procedural duration from needle insertion to free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, the need for needle redirection, the need for needle reinsertion, operator comfort, operator posture analysis, and minor complications such as paresthesia or vascular puncture
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Jakarta Special Capital Region
-
Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta Special Capital Region, Indonesien, 10430
- Universitas Indonesia
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- adult patients aged 18-65 years scheduled for elective surgery under neuraxial subarachnoid block anaesthesia
- classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- operator had performed fewer than 39 prior subarachnoid blocks
Exclusion Criteria:
- body mass index >30 kg/m²
- contraindications to subarachnoid block
- patients' inability to be positioned sitting in accordance with the study protocol
- unwillingness to participate
- operator being unable to perform subarachnoid block according to protocol (injuries etc)
- table height being unable to be adjusted to the target level
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Umbilicus
Patients with table height set so that the puncture site is at operators' umbilicus level |
Table height set so that the puncture site is at operators' umbilicus or xyphoid process level |
|
Experimental: Xyphoid process
Patients with table height set so that puncture site is at the operators' xyphoid process level |
Table height set so that the puncture site is at operators' umbilicus or xyphoid process level |
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Procedure sucess
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Determined as free flowing cerebrospinal fluid in spinal needle hub with total procedure time less than 10 minutes, redirection less than 5 minutes, and reinsertion less than 3 times, without occurrence of paresthesia and bloody tao |
Periprocedural
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to sucess
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Time needed from spinal needle-skin contact to free flow of cerebrospinal fluid |
Periprocedural
|
|
Redirection
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Numbers of needle redirection needed at the same puncture site |
Periprocedural
|
|
Reinsertion
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Numbers of spinal needle insertion (after fully pulled out from the skin) |
Periprocedural
|
|
Paresthesia
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Abnormal unpleasant sensation (tingling, burning electric shock, or pain) on lower limbs during spinal procedure |
Periprocedural
|
|
Blood contamination
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Blood observed in spinal needle hub that went away after needle redirection |
Periprocedural
|
|
Bloody tap
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Aspirated blood in spinal needle hub that persists even after needle redirection and necessitate a reinsertion |
Periprocedural
|
|
Subjective comfort assessment
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Subjective assessment of perceived comfort during procedure, asked simply as "comfortable" or "uncomfortable" |
Periprocedural
|
|
Musculoskeletal complaints
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Perceived sensation of aches, pains, tiredness, or stiffness in certain body areas as measured by nordic body map. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 28. Higher scores mean worse outcome. |
Periprocedural
|
|
Body postures score
Zeitfenster: Periprocedural
|
Assessment of forced posture risk scoring using Rapid Entire Body Assessment. Minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 15. Higher scores mean worse outcome. |
Periprocedural
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Rahendra Rahendra, MD, Universitas Indonesia
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- ijerph19010595
Nützliche Links
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 25-08-1204
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
All IPD collected during trial
IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen
Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results
IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien
De-identified participant data supporting the results reported in this article will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal via email. A data sharing agreement should be signed.
Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen
- STUDIENPROTOKOLL
- ICF
- CSR
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .