Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Community Healthcare for Asthma Management and Prevention of Symptoms (CHAMPS)

5 de abril de 2016 atualizado por: George Washington University

A Study of the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Implementing and Diffusing an Evidence-based Childhood Asthma Management Intervention in Community Health Centers

The purpose of this study is to systematically investigate across health center study sites participating in this study the process of adopting, integrating, implementing, and diffusing a minimum set of evidence-based interventions for the management of childhood asthma. Investigators hypothesized that an intervention that is evidence- and consensus-based (i.e., minimum elements to be integrated into existing practice, dosing of each element) would be implemented effectively, as measured by health center performance improvement on child health outcomes, health care utilization, and other measures (e.g., avoidable costs).

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

In this study, investigators combined childhood asthma counseling and environmental interventions proven effective in previous NIH-funded clinical trials, the National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study (NCICAS) and the Inner-City Asthma Study (ICAS), and a third study, Head-off Environmental Asthma in Louisiana (HEAL). These studies demonstrated that participant-tailored interventions reduce asthma morbidity. Through a process of consensus building, investigators adapted a hybrid of these interventions for use in primary care clinics located in medically underserved areas (FQHCs). Investigators recruited participants ages 5-12 years with poorly controlled, moderate-to-severe asthma to ensure comparability with previous studies. Unlike the earlier clinical trials, which limited eligibility to inner-city children in stable housing, CHAMPS enrolled participants regardless of housing situation (e.g., temporary/shared homes) and location (e.g., urban/rural). Investigators collaborated with 3 FQHCs in Arizona, Michigan, and Porto Rico to enroll children and implement the CHAMPS intervention but otherwise granted them discretion to make decisions about staffing, patient flow and other process determinations, while tracking what those entailed. Investigators also invited 3 additional FQHCs to recruit and enroll children in a comparison group that did not receive the intervention.

The primary aim is to identify and understand barriers and solutions to the adaptation of an evidence-based asthma intervention at the system-level. The evaluation consists of determining how a system makes room for an intervention, identifying stakeholders to make it happen, documenting the process for replication, and monitoring processes and outcomes to ensure the integrity of the intervention remains intact. The process of implementation in the unique clinical settings presented by health centers will be described, including the facilitators and the barriers to the systematic adoption of an evidence-based childhood asthma intervention into routine practice. Of particular importance are those determinants related to in-home and community-based environmental risks, the limits of understanding on the part of parents and caretakers, and community-wide policies and practices that may create health risks.

The secondary aim is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the evidence-based asthma intervention as implemented in health centers.

The third and final aim is to develop a dissemination strategy and some tools for further take up of the intervention.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

599

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, Estados Unidos, 20052
        • Milken Institute School of Public Health

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

5 anos a 12 anos (Filho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of asthma
  • Currently receiving long-term asthma control therapy and either has symptoms consistent with persistent asthma or has evidence of uncontrolled disease or is not currently receiving long-term asthma control therapy and has symptoms consistent with persistent asthma and also has evidence of uncontrolled disease
  • Caretaker speaks English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger or older children
  • Mild, intermittent asthma

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
  • Alocação: Não randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Outro: CHAMPS Intervention
Tailored asthma education and counseling for children with moderate to severe asthma who have confirmed allergies to environmental triggers present in their homes provided through a combination of clinic and home visits
Sem intervenção: Usual Care
Usual asthma care and management

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Asthma symptoms
Prazo: In the past 4 weeks
Reduction in asthma symptom days in the past 4 weeks as measured by the Asthma Symptoms and Utilization (ASU) questionnaire
In the past 4 weeks

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Utilization of health care services
Prazo: In the past year
Reduction of utilization of Emergency Departments and hospitalizations in the past 12 months as measured by the Asthma Symptom and Utilization (ASU) questionnaire
In the past year

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Success of implementation
Prazo: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by different aspects of implementation (see Outcomes 4-9) as measured by different instruments, including fidelity index, ASU, modified CAHPS and attitude patient surveys, provider interviews, leadership interviews, and Medicaid health plan claims data
5 years
Success of implementation
Prazo: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by close fidelity to intervention protocol as measured by fidelity index
5 years
Success of implementation
Prazo: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by improvement in clinical outcomes (i.e., reduction in asthma symptom days) as measured by ASU
5 years
Success of implementation
Prazo: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by high satisfaction/change in attitudes about home visits among caretakers as measured by modified Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) and patient attitude surveys
5 years
Success of implementation
Prazo: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by change in providers' perceptions of benefit of CHAMPS as measured by provider interviews
5 years
Success of implementation
Prazo: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by leadership intent to sustain services included in CHAMPS as measured by leadership interviews
5 years
Success of implementation
Prazo: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by decrease in costs, especially among high users, as measured by ASU questionnaire and Medicaid health plan claims data
5 years

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Colaboradores

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Anne R Markus, JD, PhD, MHS, George Washington University
  • Investigador principal: Herman Mitchell, PhD, Rho, Inc.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de outubro de 2010

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de janeiro de 2015

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de março de 2016

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

29 de abril de 2015

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

26 de maio de 2015

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

27 de maio de 2015

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)

7 de abril de 2016

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

5 de abril de 2016

Última verificação

1 de abril de 2016

Mais Informações

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em CHAMPS

Se inscrever