Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Community Healthcare for Asthma Management and Prevention of Symptoms (CHAMPS)

5 avril 2016 mis à jour par: George Washington University

A Study of the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Implementing and Diffusing an Evidence-based Childhood Asthma Management Intervention in Community Health Centers

The purpose of this study is to systematically investigate across health center study sites participating in this study the process of adopting, integrating, implementing, and diffusing a minimum set of evidence-based interventions for the management of childhood asthma. Investigators hypothesized that an intervention that is evidence- and consensus-based (i.e., minimum elements to be integrated into existing practice, dosing of each element) would be implemented effectively, as measured by health center performance improvement on child health outcomes, health care utilization, and other measures (e.g., avoidable costs).

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

In this study, investigators combined childhood asthma counseling and environmental interventions proven effective in previous NIH-funded clinical trials, the National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study (NCICAS) and the Inner-City Asthma Study (ICAS), and a third study, Head-off Environmental Asthma in Louisiana (HEAL). These studies demonstrated that participant-tailored interventions reduce asthma morbidity. Through a process of consensus building, investigators adapted a hybrid of these interventions for use in primary care clinics located in medically underserved areas (FQHCs). Investigators recruited participants ages 5-12 years with poorly controlled, moderate-to-severe asthma to ensure comparability with previous studies. Unlike the earlier clinical trials, which limited eligibility to inner-city children in stable housing, CHAMPS enrolled participants regardless of housing situation (e.g., temporary/shared homes) and location (e.g., urban/rural). Investigators collaborated with 3 FQHCs in Arizona, Michigan, and Porto Rico to enroll children and implement the CHAMPS intervention but otherwise granted them discretion to make decisions about staffing, patient flow and other process determinations, while tracking what those entailed. Investigators also invited 3 additional FQHCs to recruit and enroll children in a comparison group that did not receive the intervention.

The primary aim is to identify and understand barriers and solutions to the adaptation of an evidence-based asthma intervention at the system-level. The evaluation consists of determining how a system makes room for an intervention, identifying stakeholders to make it happen, documenting the process for replication, and monitoring processes and outcomes to ensure the integrity of the intervention remains intact. The process of implementation in the unique clinical settings presented by health centers will be described, including the facilitators and the barriers to the systematic adoption of an evidence-based childhood asthma intervention into routine practice. Of particular importance are those determinants related to in-home and community-based environmental risks, the limits of understanding on the part of parents and caretakers, and community-wide policies and practices that may create health risks.

The secondary aim is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the evidence-based asthma intervention as implemented in health centers.

The third and final aim is to develop a dissemination strategy and some tools for further take up of the intervention.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

599

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, États-Unis, 20052
        • Milken Institute School of Public Health

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

5 ans à 12 ans (Enfant)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of asthma
  • Currently receiving long-term asthma control therapy and either has symptoms consistent with persistent asthma or has evidence of uncontrolled disease or is not currently receiving long-term asthma control therapy and has symptoms consistent with persistent asthma and also has evidence of uncontrolled disease
  • Caretaker speaks English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger or older children
  • Mild, intermittent asthma

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: CHAMPS Intervention
Tailored asthma education and counseling for children with moderate to severe asthma who have confirmed allergies to environmental triggers present in their homes provided through a combination of clinic and home visits
Aucune intervention: Usual Care
Usual asthma care and management

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Asthma symptoms
Délai: In the past 4 weeks
Reduction in asthma symptom days in the past 4 weeks as measured by the Asthma Symptoms and Utilization (ASU) questionnaire
In the past 4 weeks

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Utilization of health care services
Délai: In the past year
Reduction of utilization of Emergency Departments and hospitalizations in the past 12 months as measured by the Asthma Symptom and Utilization (ASU) questionnaire
In the past year

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Success of implementation
Délai: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by different aspects of implementation (see Outcomes 4-9) as measured by different instruments, including fidelity index, ASU, modified CAHPS and attitude patient surveys, provider interviews, leadership interviews, and Medicaid health plan claims data
5 years
Success of implementation
Délai: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by close fidelity to intervention protocol as measured by fidelity index
5 years
Success of implementation
Délai: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by improvement in clinical outcomes (i.e., reduction in asthma symptom days) as measured by ASU
5 years
Success of implementation
Délai: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by high satisfaction/change in attitudes about home visits among caretakers as measured by modified Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) and patient attitude surveys
5 years
Success of implementation
Délai: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by change in providers' perceptions of benefit of CHAMPS as measured by provider interviews
5 years
Success of implementation
Délai: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by leadership intent to sustain services included in CHAMPS as measured by leadership interviews
5 years
Success of implementation
Délai: 5 years
Successful implementation of the CHAMPS intervention at health centers during the study period as measured by decrease in costs, especially among high users, as measured by ASU questionnaire and Medicaid health plan claims data
5 years

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Collaborateurs

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Anne R Markus, JD, PhD, MHS, George Washington University
  • Chercheur principal: Herman Mitchell, PhD, Rho, Inc.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 octobre 2010

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 janvier 2015

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 mars 2016

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

29 avril 2015

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 mai 2015

Première publication (Estimation)

27 mai 2015

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

7 avril 2016

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 avril 2016

Dernière vérification

1 avril 2016

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur CHAMPS

S'abonner