Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Methods for the Measurement of Respiratory Rate

23 de março de 2016 atualizado por: Niels Egholm Pedersen, Herlev Hospital

This study aims to investigate these research questions:

  1. Is there a difference in the results obtained, when respiratory rate is measured automatically by an electronic device (SensiumVitals® system, Sensium Healthcare) compared with a research assistant using a criterion standard approach?
  2. Is there a difference in the results obtained, when respiratory rate is measured automatically by an electronic device (SensiumVitals® system, Sensium Healthcare) compared with hospital staff's current clinical practice?

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

Respiratory rate is among the first vital signs to change when a deterioration in patient conditions occurs, and that it is highly useful in identifying high-risk patients, patients in pain, risk of death in patients treated for myocardial infarctions and medical patients at risk of cardiac arrest.

Respiratory rate is one of the seven physiological parameters included in the Early Warning Score (EWS), an aggregated track- and trigger-system for risk-stratification of patients in hospital wards at risk of imminent clinical deterioration. EWS includes an escalation protocol, defining when it is necessary for the ward staff to call for assistance and when vital parameters should be measured again.

Manual measurement of respiratory rates is the standard in hospital wards in the Capital Region of Denmark. During the measurement of respiratory rate, patients ideally have to lie still and refrain from talking. This poses a difficulty in daily, clinical practice. Several studies in hospital wards both using and not using an EWS-system report that respiratory rate is often omitted when vital signs are measured.

Even if the respiratory rate is measured regularly, poor inter-observer agreement and reproducibility of measured respiratory rates have been found. Respiratory rates recorded by nurses have been reported to be generally higher than those measured by observers using a standardised approach.

The EWS currently in use is validated using measurements obtained by normal nursing practise. If there is an element of human influence on the measurement of respiratory rate, automation could affect the prognostic properties of EWS in an unpredictable way, even if the automatically measured respiratory rates more reliably reflect the patients' physiology than current clinical practise.

If a systematic difference between the recordings by staff and the electronic devices currently on the market exists, this could have an implication on the EWS scores and subsequently, escalation protocols for patients with elevated EWS could be affected. If this is the case, EWS might even have to be re-validated using machine-measured respiratory rates.

Thus, even as there could be a number of advantages of automating the measurements of respiratory rates in hospital wards, due considerations are required before ward staff's manual measurement of respiratory rate can be replaced by measurements obtained from electronic devices. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if there is a systematic difference in the respiratory rate measurements performed by an electronic device (SensiumVitals® system, Sensium Healthcare) compared with the measurements performed by a research assistant using a criterion standard approach and the ward staff's usual measurements.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

50

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Herlev, Dinamarca, 2730
        • Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation and Medical-Short Time Ward, Herlev Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Able and willing to give informed consent to participation in the study and necessary data collection.
  • Admitted to the general medical short-time ward and planned stay there at the time of inclusion greater than two hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Wounds, burns or other conditions that prevent proper attachment of the measurement device, or where wearing the device might cause or increase discomfort from wearing the device.
  • Allergies to medical graded tape or ECG electrodes.
  • Patients with cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator.
  • Any condition or situation preventing proper information, consent and enrolment.
  • Respiratory rate measurements by another device using impedance pneumography.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Diagnóstico
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Outro: Included patients
All included patients will have respiratory rates measured by a research assistant using a criterion standard approach, by the SensiumVitals device and by the ward staff.
The patients will have their respiratory rates, heart rates and temperature (axilla) measured continuously by the SensiumVitals patch.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Difference in respiratory rate recorded by the research assistant using a criterion standard approach and the SensiumVitals device
Prazo: 24 Hours
After enrolment at the general, medical short-time ward a research assistant will measure the patient's respiratory rate using a criterion standard approach. The time of this measurement will be registered, and the corresponding measurement made by the SensiumVitals device will be extracted and used for the comparison. Reported with Bland-Altman plots.
24 Hours

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Difference in respiratory rate recorded by the ward staff using standard clinical practice and the SensiumVitals device
Prazo: 24 Hours
The ward staff's first measurement of respiratory rate after the patient is enrolled in the study at the general, medical short-time ward as registered in the electronic patient journal. The time of this measurement will be registered, and the corresponding measurement made by the SensiumVitals device will be extracted and used for the comparison. Reported with Bland-Altman plots.
24 Hours

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Early Warning Score recorded by the research assistant
Prazo: 24 Hours
Early Warning Score (point score) will be recorded using standard practice by the research assistant. Parameters included in the Early Warning Score: Peripheal arterial oxygen satuation (%), pulse (beats per minute), use of supplementary oxygen (liters per minute), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), level of consciousness (AVPU-scale), temperature (degrees celcius) and pulse regularity (yes/no).
24 Hours
Early Warning Score recorded by the ward staff
Prazo: 24 Hours
Early Warning Score (point score) recorded using standard practice by the ward staff. Early Warning Score consists of: Peripheal arterial oxygen satuation (%), pulse (beats per minute), use of supplementary oxygen (liters per minute), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), level of consciousness (AVPU-scale) and temperature (degrees celcius).
24 Hours

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Niels E Pedersen, MD, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Herlev Hospital, Center for HR, Capital Region of Denmark

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de janeiro de 2016

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de fevereiro de 2016

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de fevereiro de 2016

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

11 de janeiro de 2016

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

29 de janeiro de 2016

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

3 de fevereiro de 2016

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)

24 de março de 2016

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

23 de março de 2016

Última verificação

1 de março de 2016

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • CAMES-16-001

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever