Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Guided Modified Socket Shield With Hyaluronic Acid for Black Triangle Management

13 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Walid Elamrousy, Kafrelsheikh University

Hyaluronic Acid With AI-Guided Immediate Implant Placement Using a Modified Socket Shield for Black Triangle Management: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The Primary aim of this study will be to evaluate the clinical, esthetic, and radiographic outcomes of hyaluronic acid combined with immediate implant placement using AI-assisted and computer guided modified socket shield technique in maxillary anterior sites exhibiting black triangles.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

The growing patient demand for quicker aesthetic solutions has led oral implantologists to adopt more immediate protocols compared to the delayed approach originally recommended by Brånemark. Studies have shown that implants placed immediately after atraumatic extraction can achieve success rates comparable to those placed in healed sockets. Other findings reported favorable results with immediate implant placement, including reduced resorptive bone changes post-extraction.

Following extraction, the alveolar ridge undergoes changes that often result in bone loss. This is mainly due to the elimination of periodontal ligament attachments and trauma during extraction, with the buccal bone plate being especially affected. Retaining part of the root has been shown to help preserve bone in pontic areas. In 2010, Hürzeler et al. introduced the socket shield technique to mitigate post-extraction bone loss by maintaining the labial portion of the root. Their results indicated stabilized buccal bone height.

Multiple modifications of the socket shield technique have since emerged. Modified socket shield technique (MSST), that involved thinning the labial shield to 1.5 mm, keeping it at the crest level, and leaving the space (jumping gap) between implant and shield without grafting . Some studies highlight the role of grafting this gap in achieving better outcomes. A histological investigation in sheep compared bone healing with and without grafting and found that although bone formed in both cases, the ungrafted bone was structurally weak and had fewer trabeculae, making it unsuitable for supporting masticatory loads.

Human histology showed that this gap could allow soft tissue ingrowth. Currently, there is no definitive human research proving the necessity of grafting in this context. Therefore, Gluckman emphasized the need for further clinical studies to evaluate the benefits of grafting the jumping gap in the MSST protocol.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed digital planning and clinical execution in implant dentistry. AI-based tools analyze CBCT data, segment anatomical structures, identify vital landmarks, and simulate prosthetically driven implant positions with high accuracy. AI can improve implant positioning, angulation, depth control, and proximity to anatomical structures. It reduces surgical errors and improves long-term outcomes.

AI also enables precision in guide design and improves the predictability of immediate implant protocols. In esthetically demanding cases, such as those involving anterior maxillary implants, AI enhances decision-making and reduces clinician variability. It further allows prediction of soft and hard tissue changes through machine learning models trained on clinical imaging data.

In compromised situations, such as periodontally involved teeth, AI supports better planning by incorporating bone quality, defect morphology, and risk factors into surgical execution . It can detect critical patterns in bone loss, root anatomy, and soft tissue contours, guiding shield design and implant orientation.

Implant placement in sites previously affected by periodontitis poses risks. These sites often present with reduced bone volume, loss of papilla, apical migration of soft tissue, and compromised blood supply. Residual periodontal pathogens and altered healing responses make these areas less predictable for osseointegration.

Immediate implant placement in such sites requires careful evaluation. Inadequate primary stability and poor soft tissue support increase implant failure risk. Using guided protocols, with the support of AI and advanced techniques like root shielding, can help reduce complications. Maintaining remaining structures and optimizing healing are critical in these patients.

Reconstructing the interdental papilla remains one of the most demanding aesthetic challenges in periodontology. The interdental papilla contributes not only to appearance but also to function. It also plays a protective role for the periodontium by preventing debris accumulation. Black triangles may develop. These can result from aging, tooth shape, or periodontal conditions.

Over the years, several surgical strategies, such as coronally advanced flaps or subepithelial connective tissue grafts, have been proposed. These interventions often yield inconsistent outcomes due to limited blood flow and the small size of the papillary area. ] Recently, non-surgical techniques have gained attention for papilla reconstruction. These include prosthetic adjustments, restorative procedures, and orthodontic interventions. One minimally invasive option is the injection of hyaluronic acid gel (HA) to restore lost interdental papilla between teeth or implants. This approach is considered safe and shows promising outcomes. HA is a naturally found linear polysaccharide in the extracellular matrix and exists in gingival tissues and the periodontal ligament. Its clinical effect usually lasts between 6 and 12 months.

Due to its hygroscopic properties, HA contributes to lubrication, volume maintenance, protein exclusion, and shock absorption in papillary gaps. It also supports wound healing, tissue repair, and the structural balance of periodontal tissues.

As far as the authors are aware, this is the first study utilizing socket shield approach in periodontally compromised sites & the first study that combines AI assisted and computer guided socket shield with HA in periodontally compromised sites in anterior esthetic zone.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

32

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

    • Kafrelsheikh
      • Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, Egito, 214312
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (20-50) years old.
  • Single rooted maxillary anterior teeth with hopeless prognosis.
  • Periodontally compromised but with >50% remaining bone.
  • Presence of black triangle ≥2 mm.
  • Systemically healthy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically compromised patients and systemic conditions that complicate implant placement as uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis.
  • Alcoholic and Smokers patients.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Acute Pathology or infection at implant site
  • Patients with a history of chemotherapy, radiotherapy in head and/or neck region.
  • Patients on bisphosphonate or steroids therapy.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Flapless Socket shield technique with AI-based immediate implant placement
The root was vertically sectioned with removal of the palatal fragment and preservation of a 2 mm buccal shield shaped and beveled to support the emergence profile. Guided osteotomy was performed followed by immediate implant placement
Computer guided socket shield with immediate implant placement
Experimental: Flapless Socket shield technique with AI-based immediate implant placement & Hyaluronic Acid
The root was vertically sectioned with removal of the palatal fragment and preservation of a 2 mm buccal shield shaped and beveled to support the emergence profile. Guided osteotomy was performed followed by immediate implant placement then 0.2 mL of hyaluronic acid was injected into the interproximal papillary area
Computer guided socket shield with immediate implant placement with papilla injection by 0.2 mL of hyaluronic acid

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Interproximal papilla fill
Prazo: 12-months
Using digital photographs the fill of interdental papilla will be assessed
12-months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
pink esthetic score
Prazo: 12-months
The Pink Esthetic Score (range: 0-14) was assessed based on digital intraoral photographs by assigning a score of 0 to 2 for the following criteria compared to the adjacent reference tooth: mesial and distal papillae, soft tissue color, texture, level, contour, and alveolar bone defect
12-months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Cadeira de estudo: Ahmed abdelmonem, bachelor, faculty of dentistry, Tanta university

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

10 de maio de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

10 de junho de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

15 de junho de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

8 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

8 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

14 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

15 de maio de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

13 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • OMPDR4-26/3575

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever