- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07634679
Impact of a Bladder Flap on Cesarean Scar Niche Development (B-FIND)
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
As the rate of cesarean deliveries increases globally, the importance of a cesarean scar niche (CSN) has evolved into a significant clinical concern with long term obstetric and gynecologic implications including increasing risk for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in future pregnancies and abnormal uterine bleeding. In fact, the main cause of PAS is placentation into uterine scars secondary to cesarean deliveries
Bladder flap formation is a standard step in cesarean deliveries and involves dissecting the bladder off the uterus to push it inferiorly to allow better access to the lower uterine segment for hysterotomy and decrease risk of bladder injury. The lower uterine segment is targeted for hysterotomy as it has been shown that the proportion of muscle tissue and the thickness of the wall of the uterus increases as one travels from the cervix to the fundus. Therefore, by making an incision in the lower uterine segment, the surgeon has less tissue to go through to deliver the fetus and disrupts less muscle to preserve uterine myometrial integrity. While studies have suggested bladder flap omission in primary cesarean deliveries does not increase intraoperative complications and reduces operating time. CSN assessment was not an outcome evaluated in these studies and the decision to omit or perform a bladder flap is at the discretion of the surgeon.
Previous studies have looked at different surgical techniques and different cervical dilations at time of cesarean delivery and the impact on niche formation and location. There has been no consensus on hysterotomy or other surgical techniques to decrease risk of CSN formation. To our knowledge, there have not been studies that have assessed postoperative CSN in relation to completion or omission of a bladder flap prior to hysterotomy. As such, the investigator team hypothesizes that omission of a bladder flap lends itself to a more cephalad hysterotomy and potentially more clinically significant CSNs.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Alyssa Yeung, MD
- Número de telefone: 574-329-8771
- E-mail: ayeung@montefiore.org
Locais de estudo
-
-
New York
-
The Bronx, New York, Estados Unidos, 10461
- Recrutamento
- Jack D. Weiler Hospital - Einstein Campus
-
Contato:
- Alyssa Yeung, MD
- Número de telefone: 574-329-8771
- E-mail: ayeung@montefiore.org
-
The Bronx, New York, Estados Unidos, 10466
- Recrutamento
- Montefiore Einstein Hospital - Wakefield Campus
-
Contato:
- Alyssa Yeung, MD
- Número de telefone: 574-329-8771
- E-mail: ayeung@montefiore.org
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older
- Primary low transverse cesarean section performed at Montefiore Weiler or Wakefield Hospitals
- Able to provide informed consent in English or Spanish
- Plan for postpartum care at Montefiore Medical Center
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of a prior uterine surgery
- Known congenital uterine anomalies
- Inability to safely access lower uterine segment at time of delivery
- Hysterotomy is extended past/outside the lower uterine segment at time of surgery
- Hysterectomy is indicated prior to postpartum follow-up
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Sem intervenção: Bladder flap omission
Participants randomized to this arm will have the bladder flap step omitted prior to low transverse hysterotomy formation.
Participants will not need to alter their postoperative or postpartum care.
|
|
|
Experimental: Bladder flap formation
Participants randomized to this arm will have a bladder flap formed using standard procedure during the cesarean delivery prior to low transverse hysterotomy and delivery of the infant.
As with the 'Bladder flap omission' arm, participants will not need to alter their postoperative or postpartum care.
|
Participants in this arm will have a bladder flap completed at the time of their cesarean delivery.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Presence of cesarean scar niche
Prazo: From enrollment to transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
A dichotomous measure of the presence or absence of a cesarean scar niche, as defined by a residual myometrial thickness of <3mm at the scar level, detected on transvaginal ultrasound.
The presence of a cesarean scar niche increases risk for gynecologic complaints and abnormal placentation in subsequent pregnancies.
|
From enrollment to transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Distance of cesarean scar niche from internal os
Prazo: From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
Sonographic distance of cesarean scar niche from internal cervical os, measured in millimeters, on postpartum transvaginal ultrasound.
The investigator team hypothesizes that a scar further from the internal os has increased risk for abnormal placentation in future pregnancies.
|
From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
|
Size of cesarean scar niche
Prazo: From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
Sonographic dimensions of length and width of cesarean scar niche, measured in mm, on transvaginal ultrasound.
The investigator team hypothesizes that larger niches are associated with increased risk of abnormal placentation in future pregnancies and increased risk of future gynecologic complaints.
|
From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
|
Measurement of residual myometrium
Prazo: From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
Sonographic measurement of residual myometrium in mm by transvaginal ultrasound.
Thinner residual myometrium may imply a larger defect, increased risk for abnormal placentation or formation of a uterine window in future pregnancies.
|
From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
|
Size of cesarean scar defect in subsequent pregnancy
Prazo: From time of enrollment to time of subsequent pregnancy, up to 5 years following baseline pregnancy
|
Sonographic measurement of dimensions (length and width) of cesarean scar defect in subsequent pregnancy, measured in mm, to assess if larger postpartum niches are associated with larger defects in subsequent pregnancies as they may carry increased risk of morbidity in the pregnancy.
|
From time of enrollment to time of subsequent pregnancy, up to 5 years following baseline pregnancy
|
|
Cases of abnormal placentation in subsequent pregnancies
Prazo: From time of enrollment to time of subsequent pregnancy, up to 5 years following baseline pregnancy
|
If encountered in a subsequent pregnancy, the number of cases of abnormal placentation in the cesarean scar and placenta accreta spectrum will be summarized.
Ultrasound evidence of placenta accreta spectrum include disappearance of the border between placenta and myometrium, placental lacunae, increased vasculature from placenta extending into myometrium, abnormal invasion of placenta into surrounding organs and structures.
Pathology will be used to confirm the number of cases of placenta accreta spectrum.
|
From time of enrollment to time of subsequent pregnancy, up to 5 years following baseline pregnancy
|
|
Uterine Position/Flexion
Prazo: From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
As an anteverted and retroflexed uterus is commonly the result of a cesarean delivery and scar tissue altering anatomical position, the clinicians will observe if a bladder flap alters position of the uterus.
At the 6 week transvaginal ultrasound, the position of the uterus as anteverted or retroverted and flexion as anteflexed or retroflexed will be recorded.
In the sagittal plane on transvaginal ultrasound, if the cervix appears on the viewer's right or left, the position is anteverted or retroverted, respectively.
The anterior or posterior flexion of the fundus will define anteflexion and retroflexion, respectively
|
From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
|
Number/percentage of Operative and Postoperative Complications
Prazo: From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
Patient charts will be reviewed to summarize the number/percentage of surgical complications in each arm.
This includes complications such as damage to surrounding structures, hemorrhage, hematoma formation, surgical site infections.
|
From enrollment to time of transvaginal ultrasound, completed approximately 6-8 weeks postpartum
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Pe'er Dar, MD, Montefiore Medical Center
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
- Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Fogertey P, Roehl K, Stamilio D, Macones GA. Utility of the bladder flap at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):815-21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824c0e12.
- Fukuda M, Fukuda K, Shimizu T, Bujold E. Ultrasound Assessment of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness During Pregnancy, Labour, and the Postpartum Period. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Feb;38(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
- Angolile CM, Max BL, Mushemba J, Mashauri HL. Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action. Health Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;6(5):e1274. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1274. eCollection 2023 May.
- Klein Meuleman SJM, Min N, Hehenkamp WJK, Post Uiterweer ED, Huirne JAF, de Leeuw RA. The definition, diagnosis, and symptoms of the uterine niche - A systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Aug;90:102390. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102390. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
- Kamel R, Thilaganathan B. Time to reconsider elective Cesarean birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):363-365. doi: 10.1002/uog.22158. No abstract available.
- Kamara M, Henderson JJ, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE, Pennell CE. The risk of placenta accreta following primary elective caesarean delivery: a case-control study. BJOG. 2013 Jun;120(7):879-86. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12148. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
- Shi XM, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wei Y, Chen L, Zhao YY. Effect of Primary Elective Cesarean Delivery on Placenta Accreta: A Case-Control Study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Mar 20;131(6):672-676. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.226902.
- O'Neill HA, Egan G, Walsh CA, Cotter AM, Walsh SR. Omission of the bladder flap at caesarean section reduces delivery time without increased morbidity: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.020. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
- Rorie DK, Newton M. Histologic and chemical studies of the smooth muscle in the human cervix and uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967 Oct 15;99(4):466-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(67)90292-x.
- Kamel R, Eissa T, Sharaf M, Negm S, Thilaganathan B. Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):466-470. doi: 10.1002/uog.22053.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 2025-17472
- 2025 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA: Faculty of Social Sciences Scientific Grant at the University of Gdańsk)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
- CIF
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .