Clinical Evaluation of Vagal Nerve Preservation in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Lung Cancer (CEVNPIMISELC)
11 октября 2019 г. обновлено: Yongxin Zhou, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine
Clinical Application of Vagus Nerve Preservation in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Lung Cancer
Through prospective, randomized and controlled clinical study, patients with early lung cancer who do not need lymph node dissection according to routine diagnosis and treatment were selected.
The feasibility and safety of preserving vagal pulmonary branch intact during minimally invasive surgery were compared with traditional minimally invasive surgery, and the feasibility and safety of preserving vagal pulmonary branch intact during minimally invasive surgery were clarified.
The effect of preserving pulmonary branches of vagus nerve in minimally invasive surgery of early lung cancer on preventing or reducing pulmonary complications after operation was evaluated by main observation indexes (incidence of pulmonary complications) and secondary evaluation indexes.
It will provide a safer, simpler and more effective new technology for patients with early lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery, and provide a basis for the popularization of this new technology.
Обзор исследования
Статус
Неизвестный
Условия
Подробное описание
According to the suggestion of statistical experts and the minimum sample size, 120 IA1-2 patients who are going to undergo thoracoscopic lung surgery were selected according to the criteria of admission and exclusion.
The risk and benefit were informed and the informed consent of the subjects was signed.
The patients were numbered and randomly divided into two groups: group A with vagus nerve preservation during minimally invasive surgery and group B with traditional minimally invasive surgery for early lung cancer.
The incidence of pulmonary complications within 5 weeks after operation (see the evaluation criteria for details), operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative mortality, incidence of cardiovascular complications, rate of re-tracheal intubation, rate of re-admission to ICU, duration of stay in ICU, hospitalization costs were observed.
Statistical analysis and evaluation of the safety of preserving pulmonary branches of vagus nerve in minimally invasive surgery and the effectiveness of preventing or reducing pulmonary complications after minimally invasive surgery.
Тип исследования
Интервенционный
Регистрация (Ожидаемый)
120
Фаза
- Непригодный
Контакты и местонахождение
В этом разделе приведены контактные данные лиц, проводящих исследование, и информация о том, где проводится это исследование.
Места учебы
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, Китай, 200000
- Рекрутинг
- Yongxin Zhou
-
Контакт:
- Wenli Wang, Master
- Номер телефона: 13761295864
- Электронная почта: Anderson840913@163.com
-
Контакт:
- Shaorui Gu, scholor
- Номер телефона: 18351977377
- Электронная почта: 870005908@qq.com
-
-
Критерии участия
Исследователи ищут людей, которые соответствуют определенному описанию, называемому критериям приемлемости. Некоторыми примерами этих критериев являются общее состояние здоровья человека или предшествующее лечение.
Критерии приемлемости
Возраст, подходящий для обучения
От 18 лет до 80 лет (Взрослый, Пожилой взрослый)
Принимает здоровых добровольцев
Нет
Полы, имеющие право на обучение
Все
Описание
Inclusion Criteria:
- (1) 18-70 years of age, regardless of gender;
- (2) From May 2019 to December 2021, patients with lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic pneumonectomy (wedge-shaped, segment and lobe) were admitted to our hospital. Postoperative pathological diagnosis was non-small cell lung cancer. Preoperative pathological staging was T1a-bN0M0 and IA1-2 (pathological staging refers to UICC 8th Edition TNM staging standard for lung cancer).
- (3) In addition to routine examinations, all patients underwent enhanced chest CT, cranial CT/MRI, abdominal B-mode ultrasound, whole body bone isotope scan or PET-CT to exclude distant metastasis.
- (4) Subjects clearly understand the purpose of the study, are willing and able to comply with the requirements to complete the study, and sign the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- (1) Patients with other infectious diseases (inflammation, tuberculosis, etc.) in the thoracic cavity;
- (2) Patients are unwilling to accept the new technique of preserving pulmonary branch of vagus nerve during operation;
- (3) Clinical unstable patients with severe cardiovascular, renal and respiratory system;
- (4) Participated in other clinical trials within 30 days;
- (5) Other reasons why researchers think it is inappropriate to participate in the experiment.
Учебный план
В этом разделе представлена подробная информация о плане исследования, в том числе о том, как планируется исследование и что оно измеряет.
Как устроено исследование?
Детали дизайна
- Основная цель: Уход
- Распределение: Рандомизированный
- Интервенционная модель: Параллельное назначение
- Маскировка: Нет (открытая этикетка)
Оружие и интервенции
Группа участников / Армия |
Вмешательство/лечение |
|---|---|
|
Экспериментальный: Preservation of pulmonary vagus nerve
Preservation of pulmonary branches of vagus nerve in minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer
|
In minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer, the experimental group retained the pulmonary branches of vagus nerve
|
|
Экспериментальный: No pulmonary vagus nerve preservation
In minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer, the pulmonary branches of vagus nerve were severed
|
In minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer, the control group did not retain the vagus nerve.
|
Что измеряет исследование?
Первичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
cough after pulmonary resection
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
(1) dry cough lasting no less than 2 weeks after pneumonectomy; (2) no obvious abnormalities in chest X-ray; (3) excluding drug factors such as postnasal drip syndrome, bronchial asthma and ACEI
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
pulmonary infection
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Postoperative pneumonia should be considered if there are three or more of the following indicators:
If it contains 4, only one of the other items can be considered as a respiratory consultation to determine pulmonary infection, and need to replace antibiotics or prolong the use of antibiotics. |
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Atelectasis
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
(1) Imaging findings suggest atelectasis or consolidation of the lungs; (2) signs of dyspnea; (3) decreased oxygen saturation to below 90%.
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
hydrothorax
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Re-catheterization was needed; dyspnea symptoms; and drainage time was longer than 15 days.
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Postoperative respiratory failure or ARDS or requiring tracheal intubation
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Tracheal intubation; Ventilator; ICU
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Вторичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Operation time;
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Operation time;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Intraoperative bleeding volume;
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Intraoperative bleeding volume;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Postoperative drainage volume;
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Postoperative drainage volume;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Postoperative mortality
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Postoperative mortality
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Postoperative cardiovascular complications
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Postoperative cardiovascular complications
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Re-admission ICU rate;
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Re-admission ICU rate;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Time of stay in ICU;
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Time of stay in ICU;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Hospitalization days
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Hospitalization days
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Hospitalization expenses
Временное ограничение: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Hospitalization expenses
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Соавторы и исследователи
Здесь вы найдете людей и организации, участвующие в этом исследовании.
Следователи
- Директор по исследованиям: Yongxin zhou, Doctor, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University
Публикации и полезные ссылки
Лицо, ответственное за внесение сведений об исследовании, добровольно предоставляет эти публикации. Это может быть что угодно, связанное с исследованием.
Общие публикации
- Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S. Epidemiology of lung cancer in China. Thorac Cancer. 2015 Mar;6(2):209-15. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12169. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
- Sawabata N, Maeda H, Takeda S, Inoue M, Koma M, Tokunaga T, Matsuda H. Persistent cough following pulmonary resection: observational and empiric study of possible causes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jan;79(1):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.045.
- Sarna L, Evangelista L, Tashkin D, Padilla G, Holmes C, Brecht ML, Grannis F. Impact of respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function on quality of life of long-term survivors of non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2004 Feb;125(2):439-45. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.2.439.
- Weijs TJ, Goense L, van Rossum PSN, Meijer GJ, van Lier AL, Wessels FJ, Braat MN, Lips IM, Ruurda JP, Cuesta MA, van Hillegersberg R, Bleys RL. The peri-esophageal connective tissue layers and related compartments: visualization by histology and magnetic resonance imaging. J Anat. 2017 Feb;230(2):262-271. doi: 10.1111/joa.12552. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
Даты записи исследования
Эти даты отслеживают ход отправки отчетов об исследованиях и сводных результатов на сайт ClinicalTrials.gov. Записи исследований и сообщаемые результаты проверяются Национальной медицинской библиотекой (NLM), чтобы убедиться, что они соответствуют определенным стандартам контроля качества, прежде чем публиковать их на общедоступном веб-сайте.
Изучение основных дат
Начало исследования (Действительный)
1 января 2019 г.
Первичное завершение (Ожидаемый)
30 января 2021 г.
Завершение исследования (Ожидаемый)
31 января 2022 г.
Даты регистрации исследования
Первый отправленный
5 октября 2019 г.
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
11 октября 2019 г.
Первый опубликованный (Действительный)
14 октября 2019 г.
Обновления учебных записей
Последнее опубликованное обновление (Действительный)
14 октября 2019 г.
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
11 октября 2019 г.
Последняя проверка
1 октября 2019 г.
Дополнительная информация
Термины, связанные с этим исследованием
Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
- 2019-LCYJ-006
Планирование данных отдельных участников (IPD)
Планируете делиться данными об отдельных участниках (IPD)?
Нет
Информация о лекарствах и устройствах, исследовательские документы
Изучает лекарственный продукт, регулируемый FDA США.
Нет
Изучает продукт устройства, регулируемый Управлением по санитарному надзору за качеством пищевых продуктов и медикаментов США.
Нет
продукт, произведенный в США и экспортированный из США.
Нет
Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .