Clinical Evaluation of Vagal Nerve Preservation in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Lung Cancer (CEVNPIMISELC)
11. Oktober 2019 aktualisiert von: Yongxin Zhou, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine
Clinical Application of Vagus Nerve Preservation in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Lung Cancer
Through prospective, randomized and controlled clinical study, patients with early lung cancer who do not need lymph node dissection according to routine diagnosis and treatment were selected.
The feasibility and safety of preserving vagal pulmonary branch intact during minimally invasive surgery were compared with traditional minimally invasive surgery, and the feasibility and safety of preserving vagal pulmonary branch intact during minimally invasive surgery were clarified.
The effect of preserving pulmonary branches of vagus nerve in minimally invasive surgery of early lung cancer on preventing or reducing pulmonary complications after operation was evaluated by main observation indexes (incidence of pulmonary complications) and secondary evaluation indexes.
It will provide a safer, simpler and more effective new technology for patients with early lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery, and provide a basis for the popularization of this new technology.
Studienübersicht
Status
Unbekannt
Bedingungen
Detaillierte Beschreibung
According to the suggestion of statistical experts and the minimum sample size, 120 IA1-2 patients who are going to undergo thoracoscopic lung surgery were selected according to the criteria of admission and exclusion.
The risk and benefit were informed and the informed consent of the subjects was signed.
The patients were numbered and randomly divided into two groups: group A with vagus nerve preservation during minimally invasive surgery and group B with traditional minimally invasive surgery for early lung cancer.
The incidence of pulmonary complications within 5 weeks after operation (see the evaluation criteria for details), operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative mortality, incidence of cardiovascular complications, rate of re-tracheal intubation, rate of re-admission to ICU, duration of stay in ICU, hospitalization costs were observed.
Statistical analysis and evaluation of the safety of preserving pulmonary branches of vagus nerve in minimally invasive surgery and the effectiveness of preventing or reducing pulmonary complications after minimally invasive surgery.
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Voraussichtlich)
120
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienorte
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200000
- Rekrutierung
- Yongxin Zhou
-
Kontakt:
- Wenli Wang, Master
- Telefonnummer: 13761295864
- E-Mail: Anderson840913@163.com
-
Kontakt:
- Shaorui Gu, scholor
- Telefonnummer: 18351977377
- E-Mail: 870005908@qq.com
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
18 Jahre bis 80 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- (1) 18-70 years of age, regardless of gender;
- (2) From May 2019 to December 2021, patients with lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic pneumonectomy (wedge-shaped, segment and lobe) were admitted to our hospital. Postoperative pathological diagnosis was non-small cell lung cancer. Preoperative pathological staging was T1a-bN0M0 and IA1-2 (pathological staging refers to UICC 8th Edition TNM staging standard for lung cancer).
- (3) In addition to routine examinations, all patients underwent enhanced chest CT, cranial CT/MRI, abdominal B-mode ultrasound, whole body bone isotope scan or PET-CT to exclude distant metastasis.
- (4) Subjects clearly understand the purpose of the study, are willing and able to comply with the requirements to complete the study, and sign the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- (1) Patients with other infectious diseases (inflammation, tuberculosis, etc.) in the thoracic cavity;
- (2) Patients are unwilling to accept the new technique of preserving pulmonary branch of vagus nerve during operation;
- (3) Clinical unstable patients with severe cardiovascular, renal and respiratory system;
- (4) Participated in other clinical trials within 30 days;
- (5) Other reasons why researchers think it is inappropriate to participate in the experiment.
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Preservation of pulmonary vagus nerve
Preservation of pulmonary branches of vagus nerve in minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer
|
In minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer, the experimental group retained the pulmonary branches of vagus nerve
|
|
Experimental: No pulmonary vagus nerve preservation
In minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer, the pulmonary branches of vagus nerve were severed
|
In minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer, the control group did not retain the vagus nerve.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
cough after pulmonary resection
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
(1) dry cough lasting no less than 2 weeks after pneumonectomy; (2) no obvious abnormalities in chest X-ray; (3) excluding drug factors such as postnasal drip syndrome, bronchial asthma and ACEI
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
pulmonary infection
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Postoperative pneumonia should be considered if there are three or more of the following indicators:
If it contains 4, only one of the other items can be considered as a respiratory consultation to determine pulmonary infection, and need to replace antibiotics or prolong the use of antibiotics. |
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Atelectasis
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
(1) Imaging findings suggest atelectasis or consolidation of the lungs; (2) signs of dyspnea; (3) decreased oxygen saturation to below 90%.
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
hydrothorax
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Re-catheterization was needed; dyspnea symptoms; and drainage time was longer than 15 days.
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Postoperative respiratory failure or ARDS or requiring tracheal intubation
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Tracheal intubation; Ventilator; ICU
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Operation time;
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Operation time;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Intraoperative bleeding volume;
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Intraoperative bleeding volume;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Postoperative drainage volume;
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Postoperative drainage volume;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Postoperative mortality
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Postoperative mortality
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Postoperative cardiovascular complications
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Postoperative cardiovascular complications
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Re-admission ICU rate;
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Re-admission ICU rate;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Time of stay in ICU;
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Time of stay in ICU;
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Hospitalization days
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Hospitalization days
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
|
Hospitalization expenses
Zeitfenster: From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Hospitalization expenses
|
From the date of randomized grouping to 5 weeks after operation, the evaluation time was as long as 5 weeks.
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Ermittler
- Studienleiter: Yongxin zhou, Doctor, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S. Epidemiology of lung cancer in China. Thorac Cancer. 2015 Mar;6(2):209-15. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12169. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
- Sawabata N, Maeda H, Takeda S, Inoue M, Koma M, Tokunaga T, Matsuda H. Persistent cough following pulmonary resection: observational and empiric study of possible causes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jan;79(1):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.045.
- Sarna L, Evangelista L, Tashkin D, Padilla G, Holmes C, Brecht ML, Grannis F. Impact of respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function on quality of life of long-term survivors of non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2004 Feb;125(2):439-45. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.2.439.
- Weijs TJ, Goense L, van Rossum PSN, Meijer GJ, van Lier AL, Wessels FJ, Braat MN, Lips IM, Ruurda JP, Cuesta MA, van Hillegersberg R, Bleys RL. The peri-esophageal connective tissue layers and related compartments: visualization by histology and magnetic resonance imaging. J Anat. 2017 Feb;230(2):262-271. doi: 10.1111/joa.12552. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
1. Januar 2019
Primärer Abschluss (Voraussichtlich)
30. Januar 2021
Studienabschluss (Voraussichtlich)
31. Januar 2022
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
5. Oktober 2019
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
11. Oktober 2019
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
14. Oktober 2019
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
14. Oktober 2019
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
11. Oktober 2019
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. Oktober 2019
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 2019-LCYJ-006
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Nein
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .