Comparison of Split Box and Split Bone Block Techniques in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation (SBBTvsSBT)
Comparison of Radiological Bone Gain and Resorption Between the Split Box Technique and the Split Bone Block Technique, and Evaluation of Implant Survival: a Retrospective Study
Horizontal alveolar ridge deficiencies may prevent the placement of dental implants and often require bone augmentation procedures before implant treatment. Two techniques commonly used for horizontal ridge augmentation are the Split Box Technique and the Split Bone Block Technique.
This retrospective study included patients treated at Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry between January 2014 and January 2026. Radiographic records were reviewed to evaluate bone gain after augmentation and the stability of the augmented bone during long-term follow-up. Implant survival after prosthetic rehabilitation was also assessed.
The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of the Split Box Technique and the Split Bone Block Technique in terms of bone gain, bone stability, and implant survival.
Обзор исследования
Статус
Вмешательство/лечение
Подробное описание
Horizontal alveolar ridge deficiencies often require augmentation procedures before dental implant placement. Among the available augmentation methods, the Split Bone Block Technique (SBBT) and the Split Box Technique (SBT) are autogenous bone augmentation approaches designed to increase horizontal ridge width and facilitate implant-supported rehabilitation.
The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the radiological outcomes of SBBT and SBT with respect to horizontal bone gain, long-term bone stability, and implant survival. In addition, postoperative complications associated with both techniques were evaluated.
Patients treated between January 2014 and January 2026 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, were retrospectively screened. Patients who underwent horizontal ridge augmentation using either SBBT or SBT and had complete radiographic follow-up records were included in the study.
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images obtained preoperatively, 6 months after augmentation, and during long-term follow-up after prosthetic rehabilitation were used to assess changes in horizontal bone width and graft stability. Radiological measurements were performed to evaluate bone gain after augmentation, dimensional changes during follow-up, and long-term maintenance of the augmented ridge.
The primary outcome measures were horizontal bone gain and long-term bone resorption. Secondary outcome measures included implant survival following definitive prosthetic rehabilitation and the occurrence of postoperative complications.
The study was designed to determine whether the Split Box Technique and the Split Bone Block Technique provide comparable long-term clinical and radiological outcomes for the treatment of horizontal alveolar ridge deficiencies prior to implant placement.
Тип исследования
Регистрация (Действительный)
Контакты и местонахождение
Места учебы
-
-
Istanbul
-
Istanbul, Istanbul, Турция (Туркие), 34854
- Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
-
-
Критерии участия
Критерии приемлемости
Возраст, подходящий для обучения
- Взрослый
- Пожилой взрослый
Принимает здоровых добровольцев
Метод выборки
Исследуемая популяция
Описание
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years.
- Patients with horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency requiring horizontal ridge augmentation before implant placement.
- Patients treated with either the Split Box Technique (SBT) or Split Bone Block Technique (SBBT) at Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry between January 2014 and January 2026.
- Availability of complete radiographic records, including CBCT scans obtained preoperatively (T0), 6 months after augmentation (T1), and during long-term follow-up after prosthetic loading (T2).
- Availability of complete clinical records and follow-up data.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Incomplete clinical or radiographic records.
- Patients lost to follow-up.
- Presence of uncontrolled systemic diseases or conditions known to adversely affect bone healing.
- Use of medications known to interfere with bone metabolism or healing.
- Active infection at the augmentation site or complications that altered the planned treatment protocol.
Учебный план
Как устроено исследование?
Детали дизайна
Когорты и вмешательства
Группа / когорта |
Вмешательство/лечение |
|---|---|
|
Split Bone Block Technique (SBBT)
Patients who underwent horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using the Split Bone Block Technique.
|
Autogenous horizontal ridge augmentation procedure using cortical bone plates harvested from the mandibular ramus to reconstruct deficient alveolar ridges prior to implant placement.
Другие имена:
|
|
Split Box Technique (SBT)
Patients who underwent horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using the Split Box Technique.
|
Autogenous horizontal ridge augmentation procedure involving mobilization and fixation of a buccal bone segment to increase horizontal ridge width prior to implant placement.
Другие имена:
|
Что измеряет исследование?
Первичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Long-Term Horizontal Bone Gain
Временное ограничение: From baseline (preoperative CBCT) to long-term follow-up after prosthetic loading(average follow-up: 4.2 years)
|
Overall change in horizontal alveolar ridge width from baseline to long-term follow-up after prosthetic loading, measured on CBCT images.
|
From baseline (preoperative CBCT) to long-term follow-up after prosthetic loading(average follow-up: 4.2 years)
|
Вторичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant Survival Rate
Временное ограничение: From implant placement through study completion (average follow-up: 4.2 years)
|
Survival of dental implants placed in augmented sites following prosthetic rehabilitation.
|
From implant placement through study completion (average follow-up: 4.2 years)
|
|
Postoperative Complications
Временное ограничение: From augmentation surgery through study completion (average follow-up: 4.2 years)
|
Occurrence of complications related to augmentation procedures, including wound dehiscence, infection, graft exposure, and neurosensory disturbances.
|
From augmentation surgery through study completion (average follow-up: 4.2 years)
|
|
Long-Term Bone Resorption
Временное ограничение: From 6 months after augmentation surgery to long-term follow-up after prosthetic loading (average follow-up: 4.2 years)
|
Change in horizontal ridge width between the post-augmentation healing period and long-term follow-up, measured on CBCT images.
|
From 6 months after augmentation surgery to long-term follow-up after prosthetic loading (average follow-up: 4.2 years)
|
|
Horizontal Bone Gain
Временное ограничение: From baseline (preoperative CBCT) to 6 months after augmentation surgery
|
Change in horizontal alveolar ridge width from baseline to 6 months after augmentation, measured on CBCT images.
|
From baseline (preoperative CBCT) to 6 months after augmentation surgery
|
Соавторы и исследователи
Спонсор
Следователи
- Главный следователь: Guhan Dergin, DDS, PhD, Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry
Публикации и полезные ссылки
Общие публикации
- Dergin G, Kirac Can SB, Can S. A novel approach for horizontal augmentation with split box: A method that combines split bone block and ridge split techniques. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Dec;125(6):101790. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101790. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
- Khoury F, Hanser T. Mandibular bone block harvesting from the retromolar region: a 10-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):688-97. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4117.
Даты записи исследования
Изучение основных дат
Начало исследования (Действительный)
Первичное завершение (Действительный)
Завершение исследования (Действительный)
Даты регистрации исследования
Первый отправленный
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
Первый опубликованный (Действительный)
Обновления учебных записей
Последнее опубликованное обновление (Действительный)
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
Последняя проверка
Дополнительная информация
Термины, связанные с этим исследованием
Ключевые слова
Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
- 2025-11-02/2025-86 (Другой идентификатор: Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry Clinical Research Ethics Committee Approval)
Планирование данных отдельных участников (IPD)
Планируете делиться данными об отдельных участниках (IPD)?
Информация о лекарствах и устройствах, исследовательские документы
Изучает лекарственный продукт, регулируемый FDA США.
Изучает продукт устройства, регулируемый Управлением по санитарному надзору за качеством пищевых продуктов и медикаментов США.
Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .