- ICH GCP
- Amerikanska kliniska prövningsregistret
- Klinisk prövning NCT00895154
A Rehabilitation Program in Children With Sickle Cell Disease and Cognitive Deficits: a Pilot Study
23 april 2019 uppdaterad av: Allison King, Washington University School of Medicine
The overall goal of this project is to determine the feasibility of conducting a cognitive intervention for children with sickle cell disease.
Studieöversikt
Status
Avslutad
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
The primary aims of this clinical trial are:
- Determine the effectiveness of targeted learning and memory strategy remediation in students with sickle cell disease and cognitive deficits.
- Determine if there is improvement in academic achievement after targeted memory strategy remediation.
Studietyp
Interventionell
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
21
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.
Studieorter
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, Förenta staterna, 63110
- Washington University School of Medicine/St. Louis Children's Hospital
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
8 år till 18 år (Barn, Vuxen)
Tar emot friska volontärer
Nej
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Allt
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sickle cell disease that is confirmed by hemoglobin analysis
- Has a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) document reading by a neuroradiologist
- Cognitive deficits, which are defined by one standard deviation lower than the normal ranges of an age-based standard score in cognitive tests that are evaluated by a psychologist
- Must be a student who will remain in school for at least 2 years
- Must provide informed consent with assent in accordance with the institutional policies (institutional review board approval)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known developmental delays (these participants are ineligible because their learning potential may be biased from a prior insult)
- Intelligent quotient is less than 50 (may have impaired learning potential)
- Aphasic (i.e., unable to produce intelligible speech)
Studieplan
Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Behandling
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Aktiv komparator: General Tutoring Group
Participants will receive general tutoring in the subject of his/her choice.
|
Participants will be tutored for approximately 8-10 hours per month during the school year.
|
|
Experimentell: Tutoring + Memory Training Group
Participants will receive tutoring and memory training.
|
Participants will be tutored for approximately 8-10 hours per month during the school year.
Participants will receive memory training for approximately 8-10 hours per month during the school year.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) (WASI)
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The WASI is a brief, reliable measure of intelligence.
Participants engage in 4 subtests: Block Design, Vocabulary, Similarities, and Matrix Reasoning.
Participants receive a raw score on each of these 4 subtests.
This raw score is converted to a T score using a score chart in the WASI manual.
The T scores from all 4 subtests are summed together to obtain a Full Scale Sum of T Scores.
This Full Scale Sum of T Scores is converted to a Full Scale IQ-4 Composite Score using a score chart published in the WASI manual.
Higher scores indicate better intelligence.
FSIQ-4 Range: 40-160.
Average FSIQ-4 =100, standard deviation is +/- 15.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Verbal IQ (PIQ) (WASI)
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The VIQ score is comprised from the Vocabulary and Similarities subtests of the WASI-4.
The raw scores from these subtests are converted to T scores using score charts in the manual.
The T scores are summed together for a Verbal Sum of T Scores.
This score is converted to a Composite VIQ score using a score chart in the manual.
Higher scores = better Verbal IQ.
Range = 45-160.
Average = 100; standard deviation +/- 15.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Performance IQ (PIQ) (WASI)
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The PIQ score is comprised from the Matrix Reasoning and Block Design subtests of the WASI-4.
The raw scores from these subtests are converted to T scores using score charts in the manual.
The T scores are summed together for a Performance Sum of T Scores.
This score is converted to a Composite PIQ score using a score chart in the manual.
Higher scores = better Performance IQ.
Range = 45-160.
Average = 100; standard deviation +/- 15.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Letter Word Identification T Score (WJ-III)
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's word identification skills.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Reading Fluency T Score (WJ-III)
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's ability to read simple sentences quickly.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Calculations T Score (WJ-III)
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's ability to perform paper and pencil math computations.A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Math Fluency T Score (WJ-III)
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's ability to solve simple addition, subtraction and multiplication facts quickly.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Spelling T Score (WJ-III)
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's ability to write orally presented words correctly.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
California Verbal Learning Test-Children's Version (CVLT-C) List A Trials 1-5 Immediate Recall T Score
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
CVLT-C Trials 1-5 Semantic Clustering T Score
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The CVLT-C consists of five learning trials of 15 words which can be organized into three semantic categories.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
CVLT-C Trials 1-5 Short Delay Recall T Score
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
CVLT-C Trials 1-5 Long Delay Recall T Score
Tidsram: T scores were obtained at baseline and again at follow-up (after partcipant completed 50 hours of tutoring)
|
The CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
T scores were obtained at baseline and again at follow-up (after partcipant completed 50 hours of tutoring)
|
|
CVLT-C Trials 1-5 Recognition Discriminability T Score
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
TThe CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Number/Letter Switching T Score
Tidsram: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The D-KEFS allows for the assessment of executive functions.
There are 9 stand alone tests that can be individually or group administered.
The Number-Letter Switching condition of the Trails Making sub-test specifically assesses flexibility of thinking on a visual-motor sequencing task.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using tables provided in the manual.
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.
Samarbetspartners
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Allison King, MD, MPH, Washington University School of Medicine
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.
Allmänna publikationer
- Yerys BE, White DA, Salorio CF, McKinstry R, Moinuddin A, DeBaun M. Memory strategy training in children with cerebral infarcts related to sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003 Jun;25(6):495-8. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200306000-00014.
- King AA, White DA, McKinstry RC, Noetzel M, Debaun MR. A pilot randomized education rehabilitation trial is feasible in sickle cell and strokes. Neurology. 2007 Jun 5;68(23):2008-11. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000264421.24415.16.
Studieavstämningsdatum
Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.
Studera stora datum
Studiestart
1 september 2003
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
1 juli 2014
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
1 december 2014
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
6 maj 2009
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
6 maj 2009
Första postat (Uppskatta)
8 maj 2009
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
15 maj 2019
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
23 april 2019
Senast verifierad
1 april 2019
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Nyckelord
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- 653
- K23HL079073 (U.S.S. NIH-anslag/kontrakt)
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .