- ICH GCP
- Register voor klinische proeven in de VS.
- Klinische proef NCT00895154
A Rehabilitation Program in Children With Sickle Cell Disease and Cognitive Deficits: a Pilot Study
23 april 2019 bijgewerkt door: Allison King, Washington University School of Medicine
The overall goal of this project is to determine the feasibility of conducting a cognitive intervention for children with sickle cell disease.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Voltooid
Conditie
Interventie / Behandeling
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
The primary aims of this clinical trial are:
- Determine the effectiveness of targeted learning and memory strategy remediation in students with sickle cell disease and cognitive deficits.
- Determine if there is improvement in academic achievement after targeted memory strategy remediation.
Studietype
Ingrijpend
Inschrijving (Werkelijk)
21
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.
Studie Locaties
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, Verenigde Staten, 63110
- Washington University School of Medicine/St. Louis Children's Hospital
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
8 jaar tot 18 jaar (Kind, Volwassen)
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Nee
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Allemaal
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sickle cell disease that is confirmed by hemoglobin analysis
- Has a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) document reading by a neuroradiologist
- Cognitive deficits, which are defined by one standard deviation lower than the normal ranges of an age-based standard score in cognitive tests that are evaluated by a psychologist
- Must be a student who will remain in school for at least 2 years
- Must provide informed consent with assent in accordance with the institutional policies (institutional review board approval)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known developmental delays (these participants are ineligible because their learning potential may be biased from a prior insult)
- Intelligent quotient is less than 50 (may have impaired learning potential)
- Aphasic (i.e., unable to produce intelligible speech)
Studie plan
Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Behandeling
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Geen (open label)
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Actieve vergelijker: General Tutoring Group
Participants will receive general tutoring in the subject of his/her choice.
|
Participants will be tutored for approximately 8-10 hours per month during the school year.
|
|
Experimenteel: Tutoring + Memory Training Group
Participants will receive tutoring and memory training.
|
Participants will be tutored for approximately 8-10 hours per month during the school year.
Participants will receive memory training for approximately 8-10 hours per month during the school year.
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) (WASI)
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The WASI is a brief, reliable measure of intelligence.
Participants engage in 4 subtests: Block Design, Vocabulary, Similarities, and Matrix Reasoning.
Participants receive a raw score on each of these 4 subtests.
This raw score is converted to a T score using a score chart in the WASI manual.
The T scores from all 4 subtests are summed together to obtain a Full Scale Sum of T Scores.
This Full Scale Sum of T Scores is converted to a Full Scale IQ-4 Composite Score using a score chart published in the WASI manual.
Higher scores indicate better intelligence.
FSIQ-4 Range: 40-160.
Average FSIQ-4 =100, standard deviation is +/- 15.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Verbal IQ (PIQ) (WASI)
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The VIQ score is comprised from the Vocabulary and Similarities subtests of the WASI-4.
The raw scores from these subtests are converted to T scores using score charts in the manual.
The T scores are summed together for a Verbal Sum of T Scores.
This score is converted to a Composite VIQ score using a score chart in the manual.
Higher scores = better Verbal IQ.
Range = 45-160.
Average = 100; standard deviation +/- 15.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Performance IQ (PIQ) (WASI)
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The PIQ score is comprised from the Matrix Reasoning and Block Design subtests of the WASI-4.
The raw scores from these subtests are converted to T scores using score charts in the manual.
The T scores are summed together for a Performance Sum of T Scores.
This score is converted to a Composite PIQ score using a score chart in the manual.
Higher scores = better Performance IQ.
Range = 45-160.
Average = 100; standard deviation +/- 15.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Letter Word Identification T Score (WJ-III)
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's word identification skills.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Reading Fluency T Score (WJ-III)
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's ability to read simple sentences quickly.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Calculations T Score (WJ-III)
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's ability to perform paper and pencil math computations.A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Math Fluency T Score (WJ-III)
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's ability to solve simple addition, subtraction and multiplication facts quickly.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Spelling T Score (WJ-III)
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
This sub-test measures a student's ability to write orally presented words correctly.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using a program (Compuscore for the WJ III, Version 2.1).
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
California Verbal Learning Test-Children's Version (CVLT-C) List A Trials 1-5 Immediate Recall T Score
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
CVLT-C Trials 1-5 Semantic Clustering T Score
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The CVLT-C consists of five learning trials of 15 words which can be organized into three semantic categories.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
CVLT-C Trials 1-5 Short Delay Recall T Score
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
CVLT-C Trials 1-5 Long Delay Recall T Score
Tijdsspanne: T scores were obtained at baseline and again at follow-up (after partcipant completed 50 hours of tutoring)
|
The CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
T scores were obtained at baseline and again at follow-up (after partcipant completed 50 hours of tutoring)
|
|
CVLT-C Trials 1-5 Recognition Discriminability T Score
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
TThe CVLT®-C measures multi-trial learning and long-term recall abilities for verbal information.
The Raw scores from all trials (1-5) are summed to calculate a Total Raw Score for Trials 1-5.
This Raw score is converted to a T score using the CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System (computer system).
A higher T score indicates better performance.
Range = 0-100.
Average =50 with a standard deviation of =/- 10 points.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
|
Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Number/Letter Switching T Score
Tijdsspanne: After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
The D-KEFS allows for the assessment of executive functions.
There are 9 stand alone tests that can be individually or group administered.
The Number-Letter Switching condition of the Trails Making sub-test specifically assesses flexibility of thinking on a visual-motor sequencing task.
A participant's raw score (# of items answered correctly) is converted to a T score using tables provided in the manual.
Higher T scores = better performance.
Range: 0-100.
Average T score = 50; standard deviation =/- 10.
|
After >/= 50 hours of tutoring
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.
Medewerkers
Onderzoekers
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Allison King, MD, MPH, Washington University School of Medicine
Publicaties en nuttige links
De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.
Algemene publicaties
- Yerys BE, White DA, Salorio CF, McKinstry R, Moinuddin A, DeBaun M. Memory strategy training in children with cerebral infarcts related to sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003 Jun;25(6):495-8. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200306000-00014.
- King AA, White DA, McKinstry RC, Noetzel M, Debaun MR. A pilot randomized education rehabilitation trial is feasible in sickle cell and strokes. Neurology. 2007 Jun 5;68(23):2008-11. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000264421.24415.16.
Studie record data
Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start
1 september 2003
Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)
1 juli 2014
Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)
1 december 2014
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
6 mei 2009
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
6 mei 2009
Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)
8 mei 2009
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
15 mei 2019
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
23 april 2019
Laatst geverifieerd
1 april 2019
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Trefwoorden
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- 653
- K23HL079073 (Subsidie/contract van de Amerikaanse NIH)
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .