此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes (BARI2D)

2016年1月12日 更新者:Maria Mori Brooks、University of Pittsburgh

The BARI 2D trial is a multicenter study that uses a 2x2 factorial design, with 2400 patients being assigned at random to initial elective revascularization with aggressive medical therapy or aggressive medical therapy alone with equal probability, and simultaneously being assigned at random to an insulin providing or insulin sensitizing strategy of glycemic control (with a target value for HbA1c of less than 7.0% for all patients).

SPECIFIC AIMS

A. Primary Aim

The primary aim of the BARI 2D trial is to test the following two hypotheses of treatment efficacy in 2400 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and documented stable CAD, in the setting of uniform glycemic control and intensive management of all other risk factors including dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, and obesity:

  1. Coronary Revascularization Hypothesis: a strategy of initial elective revascularization of choice (surgical or catheter-based) combined with aggressive medical therapy results in lower 5-year mortality compared to a strategy of aggressive medical therapy alone;
  2. Method of Glycemic Control Hypothesis: with a target HbA1c level of less than 7.0%, a strategy of hyperglycemia management directed at insulin sensitization results in lower 5-year mortality compared to a strategy of insulin provision.

B. Secondary Aims

The secondary aims of the BARI 2D trial include: a) comparing the death, myocardial infarction or stroke combined endpoint event rate between the revascularization versus medical therapy groups and between the insulin sensitization versus insulin provision groups; b) comparing rates of myocardial infarction, other ischemic events, angina and quality of life associated with each revascularization and hyperglycemia management strategy; c) evaluating the relative economic costs associated with the trial treatment strategies, d) exploring the effect of glycemic control strategy on the progression and mechanism of vasculopathy including changes in PAI-1 gene expression.

研究概览

详细说明

BACKGROUND:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus, which is becoming more prevalent in our society as the population ages, is one of the strongest risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) and consequent mortality. In addition to generating an enormous toll in human suffering, diabetes places an economic burden approaching 100 billion dollars annually on the U.S. health care system. Despite the well known dismal prognosis of diabetes complicated by angiographically documented CAD, the optimal treatment paradigm for this large group of patients has not been studied. Coronary revascularization, while increasingly used, has not been directly shown to be of additional benefit to simultaneous intensive medical management of CAD along with management of hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and other risk factors. Moreover, while intensive efforts to lower HbA1c have been demonstrated to favorably affect the clinical course of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in terms of microvascular complications, the optimal hyperglycemia management strategy with regard to macrovascular outcome is not known.

These critical treatment dilemmas have motivated the development of BARI 2D, a multicenter randomized trial designed to determine in patients with Type 2 diabetes and stable CAD: 1) the efficacy of initial elective coronary revascularization combined with aggressive medical therapy, compared to an initial strategy of aggressive medical therapy alone; and 2) the efficacy of a strategy of providing more insulin (endogenous or exogenous), versus a strategy of increasing sensitivity to insulin (reducing insulin resistance), in the management of hyperglycemia, with a target HbA1c level of less than 7.0% for each strategy.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The BARI 2D trial is a multicenter study that uses a 2x2 factorial design, with 2400 patients being assigned at random to initial elective revascularization with aggressive medical therapy or aggressive medical therapy alone with equal probability, and simultaneously being assigned at random to an insulin providing or insulin sensitizing strategy of glycemic control (with a target value for HbA1c of less than 7.0% for all patients). Following confirmation of patient eligibility and provision of written consent, patients were randomized as shown below:

Number of Patients Per Treatment Assignment (N=2400 patients in total)

Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Treatment Strategy and Glycemic Control Strategy:

Revascularization and Insulin Providing (IP) N=600; Revascularization and Insulin Sensitizing (IS) N=600; Medical and Insulin Providing (IP) N=600; Medical and and Insulin Sensitizing (IS) N=600.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

2368

阶段

  • 第三阶段

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

25年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Coronary arteriogram showing one or more vessels amenable to revascularization (greater than or equal to 50% stenosis)
  • Objective documentation of ischemia OR subjectively documented typical angina with greater than or equal to 70% stenosis in at least one artery
  • Suitability for coronary revascularization by at least one of the available methods (does not require the ability to achieve complete revascularization)
  • Ability to perform all tasks related to glycemic control and risk factor management

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Definite need for invasive intervention as determined by the attending cardiologist
  • Prior bypass surgery (CABG) or prior catheter-based intervention within the 12 months before study entry
  • Planned intervention for disease in bypass graft(s) if the patient is randomly assigned to a strategy of initial revascularization
  • Class III or IV CHF
  • Creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dL
  • HbA1c greater than 13%
  • Need for major vascular surgery concomitant with revascularization (e.g., carotid endarterectomy)
  • Left main stenosis greater than or equal to 50%
  • Non-cardiac illness expected to limit survival
  • Hepatic disease (ALT greater than 2 times the ULN)
  • Fasting triglycerides greater than 1000 mg/dL in the presence of moderate glycemic control (HbA1c less than 9.0%)
  • Current alcohol abuse
  • Chronic steroid use judged to interfere with the control of diabetes, exceeding 10 mg of Prednisone per day or the equivalent
  • Pregnancy, known, suspected, or planned in 5 years after study entry
  • Geographically inaccessible or unable to return for follow-up
  • Enrolled in a competing randomized trial or clinical study
  • Unable to understand or cooperate with protocol requirements

Patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and CAD documented by coronary arteriography will be eligible for the trial if revascularization is not required for prompt control of severe or unstable angina. Diabetic patients who are being treated with insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs will be eligible as well as diabetic patients treated with diet and exercise alone provided that a diagnosis of diabetes can be confirmed by record review or that a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) greater than 125/mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) can be obtained. The determination of suitability for BARI 2D will be made by a physician-investigator at each participating institution on clinical grounds at the time of coronary angiography.

Significant CAD will be defined as at least one stenosis greater than 50%. Angina and ischemia will be assessed by use of patient self-report, physician examination, and appropriate diagnostic measures including exercise myocardial perfusion imaging, exercise echocardiography, exercise electrocardiography, and IV dipyridamole or adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging or invasively by doppler or pressure wire. Objective documentation of myocardial ischemia includes any of the following:

  1. Exercise or pharmacologically-induced:

    1. Greater than or equal to 1 mm of horizontal or downsloping ST depression or elevation for greater than or equal to 60-80 milliseconds after the end of the QRS complex
    2. Myocardial perfusion defect
    3. Myocardial wall motion abnormality
  2. Stabilized, prior acute coronary syndrome with CK-MB or troponin elevation or with new, greater than or equal to 0.5 mm ST depression or elevation, or T wave inversion of greater than or equal to 3 mm in 2 contiguous ECG leads
  3. Doppler or pressure wire showing coronary flow reserve (CFR) less than 2.0 or fractional flow reserve (FFR) less than 0.75

Among patients without documented ischemia, only patients with stenosis greater than or equal to 70% presenting with classic anginal symptoms will be eligible for randomization.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:阶乘赋值
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Revascularization and Insulin Providing (IP)
Prompt revascularization with intensive medical therapy and insulin providing glycemic control strategy
Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, other catheter-based interventions
Coronary Artery Bypass
Insulin, sulfonylurea
ACE Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, Beta Blockers, Calcium Channel Blockers
有源比较器:Revascularization and Insulin Sensitizing (IS)
Prompt revascularization with intensive medical therapy and insulin sensitizing glycemic control strategy
Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, other catheter-based interventions
Coronary Artery Bypass
ACE Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, Beta Blockers, Calcium Channel Blockers
Biguanides, thiazolidinediones
有源比较器:Medical Therapy and Insulin Providing (IP)
Intensive medical therapy with delayed revascularization if clinically indicated and insulin providing glycemic control strategy
Insulin, sulfonylurea
ACE Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, Beta Blockers, Calcium Channel Blockers
有源比较器:Medical Therapy and Insulin Sensitizing (IS)
Intensive medical therapy with delayed revascularization if clinically indicated and insulin sensitizing glycemic control strategy
ACE Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, Beta Blockers, Calcium Channel Blockers
Biguanides, thiazolidinediones

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
大体时间
Number of Participants With All-Cause Mortality
大体时间:five years
five years

次要结果测量

结果测量
大体时间
Number of Participants With Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke
大体时间:five years
five years

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Bernard Chaitman, MD、St. Louis University
  • 学习椅:Robert L Frye, MD、Mayo Clinic
  • 首席研究员:Mark Hlatky、Stanford University
  • 首席研究员:Burton Sobel、University of Vermont & State Agricultural College
  • 首席研究员:Sheryl F. Kelsey, PhD、University of Pittsburgh

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2000年9月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2008年11月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2009年3月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2000年9月28日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2000年9月28日

首次发布 (估计)

2000年9月29日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2016年2月8日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2016年1月12日

最后验证

2016年1月1日

更多信息

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

3
订阅