此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) in First Episode Psychosis Patients in Hong Kong

2015年9月21日 更新者:Chau Wing Leong、The University of Hong Kong

The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) in First Episode Psychosis Patients in Hong Kong: an Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial

The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) is a communication tool developed by van Os et al. (2002). It aims to provide an opportunity for patients to voice their needs and problem to minimize the discrepancy and miscommunication between patient and professional carer. In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators aim to examine whether using 2-COM checklist would lead to improvement in first episode psychosis patient's overall satisfaction, change in treatment option in clinicians and consultation time.

研究概览

详细说明

Communication is at the heart of psychiatric practice. Good communication has positive impact on treatment, treatment satisfaction and treatment adherence. However, different characteristics of psychosis barricade the communication between clinicians and patients. Consequently, the divergent views of needs of care between patients and clinicians may be established due to miscommunication. Such divergence may barricade the planning and the outcome of treatment.

In Hong Kong, the core psychiatric services as well as early intervention for first episode psychosis patients are provided by psychiatric outpatient clinics. Mental health services in Hong Kong are overwhelmed by large demands of the services and inadequate mental health care workforce such as low psychiatrists-to-population ratio and psychiatric nurse-to-population ratio. The large demands of services and inadequate mental health care workforce restrained the services' quality. In some busy psychiatric outpatient clinic, a clinician needs to consult 30 patients in a 3-hour session. Hui et al. (2008) study showed that the mean consultation time in one of the general psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hong Kong is 5.8 minutes.

To sum up, a cost-effectiveness instrument is in need for the early intervention psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hong Kong. The instrument has to reduce the needs' divergence, communication between clinicians and patients, and enhance the patients' involvement of clinical decision-making in the rushed psychiatric consultation. The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) may satisfy the demand.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

84

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Hong Kong、香港
        • EASY Clinic, Queen Mary Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

15年 至 64年 (孩子、成人)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be included if they meet the following criteria:

  1. attended the EASY service;
  2. were diagnosed with schizophrenia ,schizoaffective disorder or schizophreniform disorder according to ICD-10;
  3. were age between 15-64;
  4. were able to complete the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if they meet the following criteria:

  1. had history of substance misuse;
  2. had history of intellectual disability;
  3. were non- Chinese speaking patients
  4. had violent risk
  5. had suicidal risk

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:2-COM group
Patients will use the Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) once in a psychiatric consultation.
The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) is a communication tool developed by Van Os et al. (2002). It aims to provide an opportunity for patients to voice their needs and problem to minimize the discrepancy and miscommunication between patient and professional carer. 2-COM questionnaire was designed to give patients while they are waiting for consultation. Patients can either tick yes or no in the questionnaire to decide which the perceived problems are and which needs they want to discuss with the clinician. During the consultation, the ticked items would be discussed.
其他名称:
  • 2-COM
安慰剂比较:TAU group
Treatment as usual (TAU) group.
Patients will attend a psychiatric consultation as usual.
其他名称:
  • 塔乌

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Satisfaction level (patient satisfaction questionnaire)
大体时间:within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation
A patient satisfaction questionnaire as used in Hui et al. (2008) was adopted in this study. This was a self-administered questionnaire rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very satisfactory to 5 = very unsatisfactory). The questionnaire consisted of 2 parts. Part A has 6 items concerning the perceived attitude of the clinician (subscale score range, 6-30). Part B has 11 items concerning communication with the clinician (subscale score range, 11-55). The higher score indicates the higher satisfaction.
within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change of treatment (checklist)
大体时间:within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation
A checklist that measured change in treatment was adopted. This checklist included 4 items which will be rated on a dichotomous selection (yes/no) by clinician. The 4 items are related to the change of medication, providing information about treatment, involvement of other members of the care team and professional support services.
within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation
Consultation time
大体时间:From the time of patients' entering the consultation room till leaving the consultation room in a psychiatric consultation, up to 5 hours
The consultation time will be counted between patients' entering and leaving the consultation room by a stopwatch.
From the time of patients' entering the consultation room till leaving the consultation room in a psychiatric consultation, up to 5 hours

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Wing Leong Chau, RN(Psy)、Kwai Chung Hospital, Hong Kong

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2015年5月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2015年8月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2015年8月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2015年4月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2015年5月5日

首次发布 (估计)

2015年5月6日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2015年9月22日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2015年9月21日

最后验证

2015年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • UW 15-170

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅