Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) in First Episode Psychosis Patients in Hong Kong

21 de septiembre de 2015 actualizado por: Chau Wing Leong, The University of Hong Kong

The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) in First Episode Psychosis Patients in Hong Kong: an Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial

The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) is a communication tool developed by van Os et al. (2002). It aims to provide an opportunity for patients to voice their needs and problem to minimize the discrepancy and miscommunication between patient and professional carer. In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators aim to examine whether using 2-COM checklist would lead to improvement in first episode psychosis patient's overall satisfaction, change in treatment option in clinicians and consultation time.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Communication is at the heart of psychiatric practice. Good communication has positive impact on treatment, treatment satisfaction and treatment adherence. However, different characteristics of psychosis barricade the communication between clinicians and patients. Consequently, the divergent views of needs of care between patients and clinicians may be established due to miscommunication. Such divergence may barricade the planning and the outcome of treatment.

In Hong Kong, the core psychiatric services as well as early intervention for first episode psychosis patients are provided by psychiatric outpatient clinics. Mental health services in Hong Kong are overwhelmed by large demands of the services and inadequate mental health care workforce such as low psychiatrists-to-population ratio and psychiatric nurse-to-population ratio. The large demands of services and inadequate mental health care workforce restrained the services' quality. In some busy psychiatric outpatient clinic, a clinician needs to consult 30 patients in a 3-hour session. Hui et al. (2008) study showed that the mean consultation time in one of the general psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hong Kong is 5.8 minutes.

To sum up, a cost-effectiveness instrument is in need for the early intervention psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hong Kong. The instrument has to reduce the needs' divergence, communication between clinicians and patients, and enhance the patients' involvement of clinical decision-making in the rushed psychiatric consultation. The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) may satisfy the demand.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

84

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • EASY Clinic, Queen Mary Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

15 años a 64 años (Niño, Adulto)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be included if they meet the following criteria:

  1. attended the EASY service;
  2. were diagnosed with schizophrenia ,schizoaffective disorder or schizophreniform disorder according to ICD-10;
  3. were age between 15-64;
  4. were able to complete the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if they meet the following criteria:

  1. had history of substance misuse;
  2. had history of intellectual disability;
  3. were non- Chinese speaking patients
  4. had violent risk
  5. had suicidal risk

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: 2-COM group
Patients will use the Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) once in a psychiatric consultation.
The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) is a communication tool developed by Van Os et al. (2002). It aims to provide an opportunity for patients to voice their needs and problem to minimize the discrepancy and miscommunication between patient and professional carer. 2-COM questionnaire was designed to give patients while they are waiting for consultation. Patients can either tick yes or no in the questionnaire to decide which the perceived problems are and which needs they want to discuss with the clinician. During the consultation, the ticked items would be discussed.
Otros nombres:
  • 2-COM
Comparador de placebos: TAU group
Treatment as usual (TAU) group.
Patients will attend a psychiatric consultation as usual.
Otros nombres:
  • TAU

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Satisfaction level (patient satisfaction questionnaire)
Periodo de tiempo: within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation
A patient satisfaction questionnaire as used in Hui et al. (2008) was adopted in this study. This was a self-administered questionnaire rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very satisfactory to 5 = very unsatisfactory). The questionnaire consisted of 2 parts. Part A has 6 items concerning the perceived attitude of the clinician (subscale score range, 6-30). Part B has 11 items concerning communication with the clinician (subscale score range, 11-55). The higher score indicates the higher satisfaction.
within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change of treatment (checklist)
Periodo de tiempo: within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation
A checklist that measured change in treatment was adopted. This checklist included 4 items which will be rated on a dichotomous selection (yes/no) by clinician. The 4 items are related to the change of medication, providing information about treatment, involvement of other members of the care team and professional support services.
within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation
Consultation time
Periodo de tiempo: From the time of patients' entering the consultation room till leaving the consultation room in a psychiatric consultation, up to 5 hours
The consultation time will be counted between patients' entering and leaving the consultation room by a stopwatch.
From the time of patients' entering the consultation room till leaving the consultation room in a psychiatric consultation, up to 5 hours

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Wing Leong Chau, RN(Psy), Kwai Chung Hospital, Hong Kong

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Enlaces Útiles

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de mayo de 2015

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2015

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2015

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

22 de abril de 2015

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de mayo de 2015

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

6 de mayo de 2015

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

22 de septiembre de 2015

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

21 de septiembre de 2015

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2015

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • UW 15-170

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir