此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Altruistic Decisions

2017年11月24日 更新者:Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study on the Parameters That Influence Perceptual Decisions

The study aimed to understand how payoffs for others influence perceptual decision making. The research consists in testing how varying monetary payoffs for another modify the perceptual decision making processes. The use of drift diffusion models on a random dots task enable the characterization of the decision parameter(s) that are modulated when a decision is made to win payoffs for others as compared to decisions for self-benefits. Once the parameter revealed through behavioral experiment, neuroimaging is applied to find the neural correlates of the effects of taking others into account in the decision making process.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

159

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Bron、法国、69677
        • CH Le Vinatier

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 35年 (成人)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 18 and 35
  • Right-handed
  • French
  • Normal vision or corrected by contact lenses

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to the MEG examination
  • Presence of a perceptual disorder (vision) or motor impairing the capacity to carry out the tasks requested (including dyschromatopsia and achromatopsia).
  • Taking of medical treatment in progress (excluding contraceptive pill).
  • Known neurological or psychiatric history or disorders.
  • Participants in an exclusion period for any other research.
  • Participants who do not benefit from social protection.
  • Participants refusing to be informed of the results of the medical examination.
  • Participants who refuse to be informed of the possible detection of an anomaly.
  • Participants with MRI contraindications

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:基础科学
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
其他:Vicarious reward

If a decision influences the well-being of another (through monetary payoff), the decision making processes should differ from a decision that would influences only oneself. The difference will be reflected in the reaction-times and in the accuracy of the response to the task. The drift diffusion models care then used to estimate le decision parameter in each condition and understand which parameter is influenced by the beneficiary of the payoff associated with a decision.

Once the decision parameter characterized with behavioral experiment, the study aims to better understand the neural network sustaining the influence of others on the decision making process, by assessing the neural activity related to the decision making processes. Also, the research compares how the brain responses for payoff for others and payoffs for oneself, specially to confirm that these responses are located in different areas of the Anterior cingulate Cortex.

Random-dots tasks: dots appear and move, most have a random trajectory but a given proportion of them move coherently to the same direction.

  • Vicarious reward Each trial begins with a cue, showing 'me' or 'him' and filled rectangle filled proportionally to the payoff. The cue and the square are depicted in yellow (oneself) or blue (other), depending on the beneficiary. The moving dots are then presented and the subjects respond. At the end of dots motion, the feedback is presented. If the response was correct, a pile of coins proportional to the payoff is shown. For incorrect responses and misses, a red-colored cross is displayed.
  • Audience effect Each trial begins with the display of two eyes (public) or a padlock (private). The moving dots are shown and the participant answers. Audience condition changes the information available on accuracy when submitting comments. In the observed condition, an arrow shows the response. In the observed condition, no feedback is displayed.

Both behavioral task (audience effect and vicarious reward) will be studied in fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imagery). The same paradigms used in the behavioral experiment will be adapted for fMRI.

Audience Effect experiment: trials will last for 10 seconds maximum. With 80 trials for each condition (public easy, public difficult, private easy and private difficult), the task will count a total of 320 trials and have a 54 minutes duration, in 3 runs of 17 minutes each.

Vicarious Reward experiment: trials will have a 10 seconds maximum duration. Using 40 trials for each condition (other low payoff, other high payoff, self low payoff, self high payoff, control condition), the task will have a total of 200 trials and last for 54 minutes, in 6 runs of 9 minutes each.

Both behavioral task (audience effect and vicarious reward) will be studied in MEG (MagnetoEncephaloGraphy). The same paradigms used in the behavioral experiment will be used in MEG.

Audience Effect experiment: trials will last for 7 seconds maximum. With 100 trials for each condition (public easy, public difficult, private easy and private difficult), the task will count a total of 400 trials and have a 47 minutes duration. Every 100 trials (about 12 minutes of tasks), a break will be proposed to the participants.

Vicarious Reward experiment: trials will have a 7.2 seconds maximum duration. Using 75 trials for each condition (other low payoff, other high payoff, self low payoff, self high payoff, control condition), the task will have a total of 375 trials and last for 45 minutes. Every 125 trials (every 15 minutes), a break will be proposed to the participants.

其他:Audience effect
In order to clarify the complex changes in the decision-making processes induced by simple observation by others (audience) , the experiment have two levels of difficulty . These levels of difficulty will be determined in such a way as to achieve better 'public' performance than 'private' when the task is easy (high level of consistency) and poor performance when the task is difficult (low level of coherence) As described in the literature in psychology. Drift diffusion models will be used to better understand the variations in performance, to decipher between a modulation of the diffusion velocity and or of the decision threshold. This study will help characterize how observation by others modulates performance. Once the decision parameter characterized with behavioral experiment, the study aims to better understand the neural network sustaining the impact of observation by others on the decision making process.

Random-dots tasks: dots appear and move, most have a random trajectory but a given proportion of them move coherently to the same direction.

  • Vicarious reward Each trial begins with a cue, showing 'me' or 'him' and filled rectangle filled proportionally to the payoff. The cue and the square are depicted in yellow (oneself) or blue (other), depending on the beneficiary. The moving dots are then presented and the subjects respond. At the end of dots motion, the feedback is presented. If the response was correct, a pile of coins proportional to the payoff is shown. For incorrect responses and misses, a red-colored cross is displayed.
  • Audience effect Each trial begins with the display of two eyes (public) or a padlock (private). The moving dots are shown and the participant answers. Audience condition changes the information available on accuracy when submitting comments. In the observed condition, an arrow shows the response. In the observed condition, no feedback is displayed.

Both behavioral task (audience effect and vicarious reward) will be studied in fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imagery). The same paradigms used in the behavioral experiment will be adapted for fMRI.

Audience Effect experiment: trials will last for 10 seconds maximum. With 80 trials for each condition (public easy, public difficult, private easy and private difficult), the task will count a total of 320 trials and have a 54 minutes duration, in 3 runs of 17 minutes each.

Vicarious Reward experiment: trials will have a 10 seconds maximum duration. Using 40 trials for each condition (other low payoff, other high payoff, self low payoff, self high payoff, control condition), the task will have a total of 200 trials and last for 54 minutes, in 6 runs of 9 minutes each.

Both behavioral task (audience effect and vicarious reward) will be studied in MEG (MagnetoEncephaloGraphy). The same paradigms used in the behavioral experiment will be used in MEG.

Audience Effect experiment: trials will last for 7 seconds maximum. With 100 trials for each condition (public easy, public difficult, private easy and private difficult), the task will count a total of 400 trials and have a 47 minutes duration. Every 100 trials (about 12 minutes of tasks), a break will be proposed to the participants.

Vicarious Reward experiment: trials will have a 7.2 seconds maximum duration. Using 75 trials for each condition (other low payoff, other high payoff, self low payoff, self high payoff, control condition), the task will have a total of 375 trials and last for 45 minutes. Every 125 trials (every 15 minutes), a break will be proposed to the participants.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Modulation of the decisional parameter by the payoff conditions
大体时间:1 hour
behavioral data (reaction-times and accuracy) are collected and the decision parameter can be estimated from them using Drift Diffusion Models
1 hour
Modulation of the decisional parameter by the beneficiary conditions
大体时间:1 hour
behavioral data (reaction-times and accuracy) are collected and the decision parameter can be estimated from them using Drift Diffusion Models
1 hour

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Event-Related potentials
大体时间:1 hour
study of the time-locked brain activity
1 hour
Time-frequency brain responses
大体时间:1 hour
study of the oscillatory activity elicited in the brain
1 hour
BOLD
大体时间:1 hour
Variation of the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal
1 hour

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Caroline DEMILY, MD、CH Le Vinatier

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2014年2月3日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年7月22日

研究完成 (实际的)

2016年7月22日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2017年3月7日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2017年4月11日

首次发布 (实际的)

2017年4月17日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2017年11月28日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2017年11月24日

最后验证

2017年11月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 69HCL16_0680

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

3
订阅