此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Development and Validation of the Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale in Patients With Periodontal Problems

2018年2月16日 更新者:Ozge Gokturk、Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Aesthetics for individuals become increasingly important, while the aesthetic effects of periodontal disease is an important issue that should be assessed by the patient's perception.

The results demonstrate that the periodontal aesthetic perception scale showed reliable and valid scores in healthy controls and periodontal patients.

The periodontal aesthetic perception scale may be an appropriate tool to assess periodontal esthetic in clinical and research settings.

研究概览

详细说明

Aim: The aim of this study is to develop and validate a periodontal aesthetic specific tool to assess aesthetic conditions perceived by patients with periodontal problems.

Methods: With patient interviews were identified a total of 22 statements that describe the non-aesthetic gingival appearance. These 22 items were reviewed by the dentists and then Periodontologists and the number of items in the survey was reduced to 7. Subsequently, three groups of patients were included in the study: Gingival recession (GR) group, gingival enlargement (GE) group and periodontal healthy (H) group. Consequently, the validity and reliability of the periodontal aesthetic perception scale (PAPS) were examined.

Results: According to the results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), 1 item was removed from the scale. The final 6-item questionnaire was shown to have a two-domain structure. Cronbach's alpha for the whole scale was .766. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) values were between 0.98 and 1.00, demonstrating excellent agreement. Overall, these findings indicated that the PAPS has good reliability.

Conclusion: This reliable, valid and short questionnaire specific to aesthetic conditions perceived by patients with periodontal problems may serve as a valued instrument in future clinical trials.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

100

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Tokat、火鸡、60250
        • Gaziosmanpasa University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 65年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

概率样本

研究人群

Patients who fulfilled the criteria for inclusion presenting at the periodontology clinic were asked to participate in the study and those agreeing to interview were asked how and what aesthetically disturbing symptoms in their gingiva.

描述

Inclusion criteria for gingival recession group:

- The presence of gingival recession (Miller Class I, II, III, or IV) in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.

Inclusion criteria for gingival enlargement group:

-The presence of gingival enlargement (Grade 0, I, II, III, or IV) in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.

Exclusion Criteria for all groups:

  • The presence of prosthesis, tooth loss or caries in the anterior teeth
  • The precence of the psychological or systemic disease

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Gingival recession (GR) group
GR group answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale
Patients answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale
Gingival enlargement (GE) group
GE group answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale.
Patients answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale
periodontal healthy (H) group
H group answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale.
Patients answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Validity of PAPS
大体时间:6 months
The KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) test produced a value of 0.80, which was greater than the recommended threshold value of 0.50.
6 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 研究主任:Ozge Gokturk、study principal investigator

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2017年1月2日

初级完成 (实际的)

2017年7月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2017年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2018年2月12日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2018年2月12日

首次发布 (实际的)

2018年2月19日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年2月19日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年2月16日

最后验证

2018年2月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

IPD 计划说明

It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available.

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅