此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Reactive vs. Proactive Pain Control in IBD (PAIN-Sparing)

2022年7月19日 更新者：Gil Melmed、Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Reactive vs. Proactive Pain Control in Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The investigators will compare two physician behaviors for managing pain in patients with IBD: proactive vs. reactive. Both the proactive and reactive behavior/strategies are standard of care at the institution in which the study will be performed. The PROACTIVE strategy is an IBD-specific analgesic orderset (built into our EMR and approved by the institution's Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee), the REACTIVE strategy is a traditional "reactive" analgesic prescribing (prescribing medications only when patients have pain). The PROACTIVE IBD-specific analgesic orderset consists of medications which have evidence for use in IBD-related pain. This orderset is an educational guide, it does not force any order. The reactive prescribing habits could contain an array of pain medications depending on what the provider wants to prescribe.

Aims:

Aim 1: To assess whether there is a difference in pain scores or functional activity among hospitalized patients with IBD between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Aim 2: To assess whether there is a difference in inpatient opioid-prescribing between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Aim 3: To assess whether there is a difference in health care utilization, including length-of-stay and 30-day readmission, between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

研究概览

地位

终止

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Prospective, investigator-blinded, single-institution randomized-control trial . Consecutive adult patients with IBD (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) admitted to the hospital will be screened for eligibility, and eligible patients will be approached and consented to participate. Subjects will be randomized to receive the P.A.I.N.-Sparing bundle or usual care. Patient randomization will be stratified by provider to avoid bias, using a web-based in-house system (RANDI3). Subjects will also be provided with a fitness tracker (Fitbit(R)) to measure functional status during their hospital stay.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

33

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

  • 美国
    • California
      • Los Angeles、California、美国、90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with confirmed IBD diagnosis
  • Admitted for primary IBD-related sign or symptom

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted for primary non-IBD complaint
  • Surgery in the last 30 days
  • Alternative (non-IBD) GI diagnosis determined
  • Age <18
  • Pregnancy

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：卫生服务研究
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：Proactive

Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing:

Pain management in patients in the proactive physician-behavior group will be based on the IBD Pain orderset in our EMR. This orderset is already in use and standard-of-care at Cedars. The orderset uses pain medications, which have evidence for use in IBD. The orderset is simply a guide to clinicians and does not force any doctor or patient to be in a "protocol".
行为的：Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing
Medications suggested to the physician with enhanced ease of ordering.
其他名称：
  • P.A.I.N.-Sparing Bundle
无干预：Reactive (Control Group)
Pain management in patients in the reactive group (control group) will follow traditional prescribing habits. As different providers vary in the way they treat pain, analgesic medication prescribing in the control group will be inherently variable in nature. The control group does not constitute a lack of treatment or placebo; rather, pain management in the control group will not be proactive as in the intervention group.

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Patient-Reported Pain Scores
大体时间：Difference in the average daily pain score from the first to the last day of hospitalization, typically 7 days.
Visual Analog Pain Numeric Rating Scale (Scale range 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain))
Difference in the average daily pain score from the first to the last day of hospitalization, typically 7 days.

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Healthcare Utilization
大体时间：From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
Hospital length of stay (in days)
From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
Functional Activity
大体时间：From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
FitBit activity (number of steps per day)
From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
Opioid-Consumption
大体时间：From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
Milligram morphine-equivalents consumed per day
From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

调查人员

  • 研究主任：Sameer K Berry, MD, MBA、Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2019年1月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2022年7月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2022年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2018年12月4日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2019年1月7日

首次发布 (实际的)

2019年1月10日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2022年7月22日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2022年7月19日

最后验证

2022年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • Pro00050742

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅