Reactive vs. Proactive Pain Control in IBD (PAIN-Sparing)

July 19, 2022 updated by: Gil Melmed, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Reactive vs. Proactive Pain Control in Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The investigators will compare two physician behaviors for managing pain in patients with IBD: proactive vs. reactive. Both the proactive and reactive behavior/strategies are standard of care at the institution in which the study will be performed. The PROACTIVE strategy is an IBD-specific analgesic orderset (built into our EMR and approved by the institution's Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee), the REACTIVE strategy is a traditional "reactive" analgesic prescribing (prescribing medications only when patients have pain). The PROACTIVE IBD-specific analgesic orderset consists of medications which have evidence for use in IBD-related pain. This orderset is an educational guide, it does not force any order. The reactive prescribing habits could contain an array of pain medications depending on what the provider wants to prescribe.

Aims:

Aim 1: To assess whether there is a difference in pain scores or functional activity among hospitalized patients with IBD between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Aim 2: To assess whether there is a difference in inpatient opioid-prescribing between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Aim 3: To assess whether there is a difference in health care utilization, including length-of-stay and 30-day readmission, between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective, investigator-blinded, single-institution randomized-control trial . Consecutive adult patients with IBD (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) admitted to the hospital will be screened for eligibility, and eligible patients will be approached and consented to participate. Subjects will be randomized to receive the P.A.I.N.-Sparing bundle or usual care. Patient randomization will be stratified by provider to avoid bias, using a web-based in-house system (RANDI3). Subjects will also be provided with a fitness tracker (Fitbit(R)) to measure functional status during their hospital stay.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with confirmed IBD diagnosis
  • Admitted for primary IBD-related sign or symptom

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted for primary non-IBD complaint
  • Surgery in the last 30 days
  • Alternative (non-IBD) GI diagnosis determined
  • Age <18
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Proactive

Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing:

Pain management in patients in the proactive physician-behavior group will be based on the IBD Pain orderset in our EMR. This orderset is already in use and standard-of-care at Cedars. The orderset uses pain medications, which have evidence for use in IBD. The orderset is simply a guide to clinicians and does not force any doctor or patient to be in a "protocol".

Medications suggested to the physician with enhanced ease of ordering.
Other Names:
  • P.A.I.N.-Sparing Bundle
No Intervention: Reactive (Control Group)
Pain management in patients in the reactive group (control group) will follow traditional prescribing habits. As different providers vary in the way they treat pain, analgesic medication prescribing in the control group will be inherently variable in nature. The control group does not constitute a lack of treatment or placebo; rather, pain management in the control group will not be proactive as in the intervention group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Pain Scores
Time Frame: Difference in the average daily pain score from the first to the last day of hospitalization, typically 7 days.
Visual Analog Pain Numeric Rating Scale (Scale range 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain))
Difference in the average daily pain score from the first to the last day of hospitalization, typically 7 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healthcare Utilization
Time Frame: From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
Hospital length of stay (in days)
From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
Functional Activity
Time Frame: From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
FitBit activity (number of steps per day)
From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
Opioid-Consumption
Time Frame: From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.
Milligram morphine-equivalents consumed per day
From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sameer K Berry, MD, MBA, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing

3
Subscribe