此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With a Self-adhesive, Self-etch or a Conventional Resin Cement

2021年4月13日 更新者:Mansoura University

Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With Three Different Luting Strategies

The present study was designed to provide further evidence in this particular research prospective, and this study hence aimed to clinically evaluate the 5-years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations. The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performances of the three different resin cement strategies for luting indirect resin composite inlays in MOD Class II restorations for 5-years.

The research question was as follows: Do self-adhesive resin cements in class II restorations present better clinical performances than conventional etch-and-rinse and self-etch resin cements according to the USPHS criteria?

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Objective: To clinically evaluate the 5 years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations.

Materials and Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted following the protocol, 40 patients with three large cavities for each one that indicated for indirect MOD Class II restorations were enrolled in the current study. Then, 120 indirect resin composite inlay restorations (SR Nexco) were placed and luted with three different resin cement strategies; an etch-and-rinse (Variolink N), self-etch (Panavia F2.0) and self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem). Each resin cement was used for luting 20 inlay restorations. A single operator placed all restorations according to the manufacturer's instructions. Immediatelly after placement, the restorations were finished and polished. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and at 1, 3 and 5 years intervals after placement by two independent examiners using modified USPHS criteria. The changes in the USPHS parameters during the 5 years period were analyzed with Fredman test. The baseline scores were compared with those at the recall visits using Wilcoxon signed rank test, where the level of significance was set at p˂0.05.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

40

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura、Dakahlia、埃及、35516
        • Faculty of Dentistry

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

20年 至 35年 (成人)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with primary caries involving occlusal surface only with ICDAS 2 and 3.
  • Patients with cavities no more than one-third of the intercuspal distance.
  • Patients must have a good oral hygiene.
  • Patients with tooth gives positive response to testing with an electric pulp tester.
  • Patients with normal and full occlusion.
  • Patients with opposing teeth should be natural with no restorations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High caries risk patients with extremely poor oral hygiene.
  • Patients involved in orthodontic treatment or periodontal surgery.
  • Patients with periodontally involved teeth (chronic periodontitis).
  • Patients with abutments should be excluded.
  • Patients with heavy bruxism habits and clenching.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:交叉作业
  • 屏蔽:三倍

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Etch-and-rinse (Variolink N) resin cement
For etch-and-rinse resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by Variolink N resin cement.
Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid
安慰剂比较:Self-etch (Panavia F2.0) resin cement
Regarding self-etch resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by Panavia F2.0 resin cement.
Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid
无干预:Self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem) resin cement
For self-adhesive resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by RelyX Unicem resin cement.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Percentage % of patients with marginal staining
大体时间:5 years after restoration procedure
Percentage of marginal staining in patients was clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restorations were given the score Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for clinically acceptable and Charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need for replacement.
5 years after restoration procedure

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2016年10月10日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年10月10日

研究完成 (实际的)

2020年9月10日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2021年4月10日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2021年4月13日

首次发布 (实际的)

2021年4月19日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2021年4月19日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2021年4月13日

最后验证

2021年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • A10150421

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan can be shared to other researchers

IPD 共享时间框架

Data will be available within 3 Months for 5 years

IPD 共享访问标准

For anyone

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 树液

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅