Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With a Self-adhesive, Self-etch or a Conventional Resin Cement
Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With Three Different Luting Strategies
The present study was designed to provide further evidence in this particular research prospective, and this study hence aimed to clinically evaluate the 5-years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations. The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performances of the three different resin cement strategies for luting indirect resin composite inlays in MOD Class II restorations for 5-years.
The research question was as follows: Do self-adhesive resin cements in class II restorations present better clinical performances than conventional etch-and-rinse and self-etch resin cements according to the USPHS criteria?
Studieoversikt
Detaljert beskrivelse
Objective: To clinically evaluate the 5 years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations.
Materials and Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted following the protocol, 40 patients with three large cavities for each one that indicated for indirect MOD Class II restorations were enrolled in the current study. Then, 120 indirect resin composite inlay restorations (SR Nexco) were placed and luted with three different resin cement strategies; an etch-and-rinse (Variolink N), self-etch (Panavia F2.0) and self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem). Each resin cement was used for luting 20 inlay restorations. A single operator placed all restorations according to the manufacturer's instructions. Immediatelly after placement, the restorations were finished and polished. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and at 1, 3 and 5 years intervals after placement by two independent examiners using modified USPHS criteria. The changes in the USPHS parameters during the 5 years period were analyzed with Fredman test. The baseline scores were compared with those at the recall visits using Wilcoxon signed rank test, where the level of significance was set at p˂0.05.
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
Dakahlia
-
Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35516
- Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with primary caries involving occlusal surface only with ICDAS 2 and 3.
- Patients with cavities no more than one-third of the intercuspal distance.
- Patients must have a good oral hygiene.
- Patients with tooth gives positive response to testing with an electric pulp tester.
- Patients with normal and full occlusion.
- Patients with opposing teeth should be natural with no restorations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- High caries risk patients with extremely poor oral hygiene.
- Patients involved in orthodontic treatment or periodontal surgery.
- Patients with periodontally involved teeth (chronic periodontitis).
- Patients with abutments should be excluded.
- Patients with heavy bruxism habits and clenching.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Crossover-oppdrag
- Masking: Trippel
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Aktiv komparator: Etch-and-rinse (Variolink N) resin cement
For etch-and-rinse resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by Variolink N resin cement.
|
Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid
|
|
Placebo komparator: Self-etch (Panavia F2.0) resin cement
Regarding self-etch resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by Panavia F2.0 resin cement.
|
Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid
|
|
Ingen inngripen: Self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem) resin cement
For self-adhesive resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by RelyX Unicem resin cement.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage % of patients with marginal staining
Tidsramme: 5 years after restoration procedure
|
Percentage of marginal staining in patients was clinically assessed using USPHS criteria.
Restorations were given the score Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for clinically acceptable and Charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need for replacement.
|
5 years after restoration procedure
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- A10150421
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
IPD-delingstidsramme
Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling
IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SEVJE
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .