Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With a Self-adhesive, Self-etch or a Conventional Resin Cement
Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With Three Different Luting Strategies
The present study was designed to provide further evidence in this particular research prospective, and this study hence aimed to clinically evaluate the 5-years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations. The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performances of the three different resin cement strategies for luting indirect resin composite inlays in MOD Class II restorations for 5-years.
The research question was as follows: Do self-adhesive resin cements in class II restorations present better clinical performances than conventional etch-and-rinse and self-etch resin cements according to the USPHS criteria?
Visão geral do estudo
Descrição detalhada
Objective: To clinically evaluate the 5 years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations.
Materials and Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted following the protocol, 40 patients with three large cavities for each one that indicated for indirect MOD Class II restorations were enrolled in the current study. Then, 120 indirect resin composite inlay restorations (SR Nexco) were placed and luted with three different resin cement strategies; an etch-and-rinse (Variolink N), self-etch (Panavia F2.0) and self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem). Each resin cement was used for luting 20 inlay restorations. A single operator placed all restorations according to the manufacturer's instructions. Immediatelly after placement, the restorations were finished and polished. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and at 1, 3 and 5 years intervals after placement by two independent examiners using modified USPHS criteria. The changes in the USPHS parameters during the 5 years period were analyzed with Fredman test. The baseline scores were compared with those at the recall visits using Wilcoxon signed rank test, where the level of significance was set at p˂0.05.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Dakahlia
-
Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egito, 35516
- Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with primary caries involving occlusal surface only with ICDAS 2 and 3.
- Patients with cavities no more than one-third of the intercuspal distance.
- Patients must have a good oral hygiene.
- Patients with tooth gives positive response to testing with an electric pulp tester.
- Patients with normal and full occlusion.
- Patients with opposing teeth should be natural with no restorations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- High caries risk patients with extremely poor oral hygiene.
- Patients involved in orthodontic treatment or periodontal surgery.
- Patients with periodontally involved teeth (chronic periodontitis).
- Patients with abutments should be excluded.
- Patients with heavy bruxism habits and clenching.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
- Mascaramento: Triplo
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: Etch-and-rinse (Variolink N) resin cement
For etch-and-rinse resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by Variolink N resin cement.
|
Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid
|
|
Comparador de Placebo: Self-etch (Panavia F2.0) resin cement
Regarding self-etch resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by Panavia F2.0 resin cement.
|
Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid
|
|
Sem intervenção: Self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem) resin cement
For self-adhesive resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by RelyX Unicem resin cement.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage % of patients with marginal staining
Prazo: 5 years after restoration procedure
|
Percentage of marginal staining in patients was clinically assessed using USPHS criteria.
Restorations were given the score Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for clinically acceptable and Charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need for replacement.
|
5 years after restoration procedure
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- A10150421
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .