Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With a Self-adhesive, Self-etch or a Conventional Resin Cement
Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With Three Different Luting Strategies
The present study was designed to provide further evidence in this particular research prospective, and this study hence aimed to clinically evaluate the 5-years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations. The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performances of the three different resin cement strategies for luting indirect resin composite inlays in MOD Class II restorations for 5-years.
The research question was as follows: Do self-adhesive resin cements in class II restorations present better clinical performances than conventional etch-and-rinse and self-etch resin cements according to the USPHS criteria?
Studie Overzicht
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
Objective: To clinically evaluate the 5 years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations.
Materials and Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted following the protocol, 40 patients with three large cavities for each one that indicated for indirect MOD Class II restorations were enrolled in the current study. Then, 120 indirect resin composite inlay restorations (SR Nexco) were placed and luted with three different resin cement strategies; an etch-and-rinse (Variolink N), self-etch (Panavia F2.0) and self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem). Each resin cement was used for luting 20 inlay restorations. A single operator placed all restorations according to the manufacturer's instructions. Immediatelly after placement, the restorations were finished and polished. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and at 1, 3 and 5 years intervals after placement by two independent examiners using modified USPHS criteria. The changes in the USPHS parameters during the 5 years period were analyzed with Fredman test. The baseline scores were compared with those at the recall visits using Wilcoxon signed rank test, where the level of significance was set at p˂0.05.
Studietype
Inschrijving (Werkelijk)
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
Studie Locaties
-
-
Dakahlia
-
Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypte, 35516
- Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with primary caries involving occlusal surface only with ICDAS 2 and 3.
- Patients with cavities no more than one-third of the intercuspal distance.
- Patients must have a good oral hygiene.
- Patients with tooth gives positive response to testing with an electric pulp tester.
- Patients with normal and full occlusion.
- Patients with opposing teeth should be natural with no restorations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- High caries risk patients with extremely poor oral hygiene.
- Patients involved in orthodontic treatment or periodontal surgery.
- Patients with periodontally involved teeth (chronic periodontitis).
- Patients with abutments should be excluded.
- Patients with heavy bruxism habits and clenching.
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Behandeling
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Crossover-opdracht
- Masker: Verdrievoudigen
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Actieve vergelijker: Etch-and-rinse (Variolink N) resin cement
For etch-and-rinse resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by Variolink N resin cement.
|
Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid
|
|
Placebo-vergelijker: Self-etch (Panavia F2.0) resin cement
Regarding self-etch resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by Panavia F2.0 resin cement.
|
Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid
|
|
Geen tussenkomst: Self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem) resin cement
For self-adhesive resin cement, 40 inlays were cemented by RelyX Unicem resin cement.
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage % of patients with marginal staining
Tijdsspanne: 5 years after restoration procedure
|
Percentage of marginal staining in patients was clinically assessed using USPHS criteria.
Restorations were given the score Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for clinically acceptable and Charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need for replacement.
|
5 years after restoration procedure
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Sponsor
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Werkelijk)
Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- A10150421
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
Beschrijving IPD-plan
IPD-tijdsbestek voor delen
IPD-toegangscriteria voor delen
IPD delen Ondersteunend informatietype
- LEERPROTOCOOL
- SAP
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .